Loading…

Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry

Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresources 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509
Main Authors: İnce, Melike Nur, Taşdemir, Çağatay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 6509
container_issue 3
container_start_page 6478
container_title Bioresources
container_volume 19
creator İnce, Melike Nur
Taşdemir, Çağatay
description Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.
doi_str_mv 10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3095215666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdR8PkXJODWqXlMksmylNEKlRbRdchr2pRxUpPMov_eaSvi6h4uh3MfX1HcIzhBlHD2pH2ILk2QmJAJq3hdMgrFWXGFBIElRpid_9OXxXVKWwirmiB4VQzPyvjO5z3oglHZhx4k1zlzVKq3oFP7MGSw61Tf-34N8iaGYb0B0_nqEazel2_Nx7xpHo_e2fK9WUxX4MvlTbAJ-H60O9AOsfd5iG5s2CHluL8tLlrVJXf3W2-Kz-fmYzYvF8uX19l0URrMq1wq4qwWlXWwtq7VNRaOc8haDHWLRaWNprjC1BgmKswQVUIrTi23WCNFeUtuitdTrg1qK3fRf6m4l0F5eWyEuJYqZm86JwkV0GJDBIV1NT5KOIZqzluOuFBQwzHr4ZS1i-F7cCnLbRgPG9eXBAqKEWWMjS52cpkYUoqu_ZuKoDzikidcEglJ5AGXPOAiP3A9iWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095215666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</creator><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><description>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytic hierarchy process ; analytical hierarchy process ; commercial furniture ; Competitive advantage ; Competitiveness ; Costs ; Decision making ; facility location selection ; facility planning ; Furniture ; Hierarchies ; Internal layout ; Linear programming ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Materials handling ; Methods ; multi-criteria decision making ; Planning ; Plant layout ; Productivity ; Raw materials ; Site selection ; Sustainability ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509</ispartof><rights>2024. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3095215666/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3095215666?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>analytical hierarchy process</subject><subject>commercial furniture</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>facility location selection</subject><subject>facility planning</subject><subject>Furniture</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Internal layout</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Materials handling</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision making</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdR8PkXJODWqXlMksmylNEKlRbRdchr2pRxUpPMov_eaSvi6h4uh3MfX1HcIzhBlHD2pH2ILk2QmJAJq3hdMgrFWXGFBIElRpid_9OXxXVKWwirmiB4VQzPyvjO5z3oglHZhx4k1zlzVKq3oFP7MGSw61Tf-34N8iaGYb0B0_nqEazel2_Nx7xpHo_e2fK9WUxX4MvlTbAJ-H60O9AOsfd5iG5s2CHluL8tLlrVJXf3W2-Kz-fmYzYvF8uX19l0URrMq1wq4qwWlXWwtq7VNRaOc8haDHWLRaWNprjC1BgmKswQVUIrTi23WCNFeUtuitdTrg1qK3fRf6m4l0F5eWyEuJYqZm86JwkV0GJDBIV1NT5KOIZqzluOuFBQwzHr4ZS1i-F7cCnLbRgPG9eXBAqKEWWMjS52cpkYUoqu_ZuKoDzikidcEglJ5AGXPOAiP3A9iWs</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>İnce, Melike Nur</creator><creator>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><author>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>analytical hierarchy process</topic><topic>commercial furniture</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>facility location selection</topic><topic>facility planning</topic><topic>Furniture</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Internal layout</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Materials handling</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision making</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>İnce, Melike Nur</au><au>Taşdemir, Çağatay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>6478</spage><epage>6509</epage><pages>6478-6509</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-2126
ispartof Bioresources, 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509
issn 1930-2126
1930-2126
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Algorithms
Analytic hierarchy process
analytical hierarchy process
commercial furniture
Competitive advantage
Competitiveness
Costs
Decision making
facility location selection
facility planning
Furniture
Hierarchies
Internal layout
Linear programming
Manufacturing
Manufacturing industry
Materials handling
Methods
multi-criteria decision making
Planning
Plant layout
Productivity
Raw materials
Site selection
Sustainability
Work stations
title Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facility%20location%20selection%20and%20layout%20planning%20through%20AHP,%20PROMETHEE,%20and%20CORELAP%20methods%20in%20the%20furniture%20industry&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=%C4%B0nce,%20Melike%20Nur&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=6478&rft.epage=6509&rft.pages=6478-6509&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3095215666%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095215666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true