Loading…
Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry
Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresources 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 6509 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 6478 |
container_title | Bioresources |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | İnce, Melike Nur Taşdemir, Çağatay |
description | Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3095215666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdR8PkXJODWqXlMksmylNEKlRbRdchr2pRxUpPMov_eaSvi6h4uh3MfX1HcIzhBlHD2pH2ILk2QmJAJq3hdMgrFWXGFBIElRpid_9OXxXVKWwirmiB4VQzPyvjO5z3oglHZhx4k1zlzVKq3oFP7MGSw61Tf-34N8iaGYb0B0_nqEazel2_Nx7xpHo_e2fK9WUxX4MvlTbAJ-H60O9AOsfd5iG5s2CHluL8tLlrVJXf3W2-Kz-fmYzYvF8uX19l0URrMq1wq4qwWlXWwtq7VNRaOc8haDHWLRaWNprjC1BgmKswQVUIrTi23WCNFeUtuitdTrg1qK3fRf6m4l0F5eWyEuJYqZm86JwkV0GJDBIV1NT5KOIZqzluOuFBQwzHr4ZS1i-F7cCnLbRgPG9eXBAqKEWWMjS52cpkYUoqu_ZuKoDzikidcEglJ5AGXPOAiP3A9iWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095215666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</creator><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><description>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytic hierarchy process ; analytical hierarchy process ; commercial furniture ; Competitive advantage ; Competitiveness ; Costs ; Decision making ; facility location selection ; facility planning ; Furniture ; Hierarchies ; Internal layout ; Linear programming ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Materials handling ; Methods ; multi-criteria decision making ; Planning ; Plant layout ; Productivity ; Raw materials ; Site selection ; Sustainability ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509</ispartof><rights>2024. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3095215666/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3095215666?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>analytical hierarchy process</subject><subject>commercial furniture</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>facility location selection</subject><subject>facility planning</subject><subject>Furniture</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Internal layout</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Materials handling</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision making</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Plant layout</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEUhQdR8PkXJODWqXlMksmylNEKlRbRdchr2pRxUpPMov_eaSvi6h4uh3MfX1HcIzhBlHD2pH2ILk2QmJAJq3hdMgrFWXGFBIElRpid_9OXxXVKWwirmiB4VQzPyvjO5z3oglHZhx4k1zlzVKq3oFP7MGSw61Tf-34N8iaGYb0B0_nqEazel2_Nx7xpHo_e2fK9WUxX4MvlTbAJ-H60O9AOsfd5iG5s2CHluL8tLlrVJXf3W2-Kz-fmYzYvF8uX19l0URrMq1wq4qwWlXWwtq7VNRaOc8haDHWLRaWNprjC1BgmKswQVUIrTi23WCNFeUtuitdTrg1qK3fRf6m4l0F5eWyEuJYqZm86JwkV0GJDBIV1NT5KOIZqzluOuFBQwzHr4ZS1i-F7cCnLbRgPG9eXBAqKEWWMjS52cpkYUoqu_ZuKoDzikidcEglJ5AGXPOAiP3A9iWs</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>İnce, Melike Nur</creator><creator>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</title><author>İnce, Melike Nur ; Taşdemir, Çağatay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>analytical hierarchy process</topic><topic>commercial furniture</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>facility location selection</topic><topic>facility planning</topic><topic>Furniture</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Internal layout</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Materials handling</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision making</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Plant layout</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>İnce, Melike Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşdemir, Çağatay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>İnce, Melike Nur</au><au>Taşdemir, Çağatay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>6478</spage><epage>6509</epage><pages>6478-6509</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Facility location selection and internal layout planning are critical strategic decisions for long-term sustainability. This study identified the most feasible location and optimal layout for a commercial bedroom furniture manufacturing facility through a seven-phase evaluation of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, and Bursa. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and PROMETHEE were used for city and district selection, with AHP calculating criteria weights and PROMETHEE ranking alternatives. The Borda Count Method aggregated MCDM results, selecting Istanbul as the optimal city and Dudullu Organized Industrial Zone (O.I.Z.) as the most favorable district. The CORELAP method developed an optimal single-story layout for a 2688 m² production and assembly facility, enhancing production flow, reducing material handling costs, and improving efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of strategic facility location and layout planning in improving the furniture industry’s competitiveness and sustainability. The practical implications of this research are significant, as the findings can be directly applied to improve the competitiveness of the furniture industry. The study offers a comprehensive framework for strategic decision-making, providing valuable insights and a systematic approach applicable to similar problems in various sectors.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-2126 |
ispartof | Bioresources, 2024-08, Vol.19 (3), p.6478-6509 |
issn | 1930-2126 1930-2126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3590d2c3950842129e61877f7179a0b0 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Algorithms Analytic hierarchy process analytical hierarchy process commercial furniture Competitive advantage Competitiveness Costs Decision making facility location selection facility planning Furniture Hierarchies Internal layout Linear programming Manufacturing Manufacturing industry Materials handling Methods multi-criteria decision making Planning Plant layout Productivity Raw materials Site selection Sustainability Work stations |
title | Facility location selection and layout planning through AHP, PROMETHEE, and CORELAP methods in the furniture industry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facility%20location%20selection%20and%20layout%20planning%20through%20AHP,%20PROMETHEE,%20and%20CORELAP%20methods%20in%20the%20furniture%20industry&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=%C4%B0nce,%20Melike%20Nur&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=6478&rft.epage=6509&rft.pages=6478-6509&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.19.3.6478-6509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3095215666%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3edb94de08defb829e7706f20bf294bcb52425cc6942615a9ba75d7d2b1a57f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095215666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |