A comparison of two different doses of morphine added to spinal bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repair

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine on postoperative analgesia, postoperative first mobilization and urination times and the severity of side effects. After Institutional Ethical Committee approval, 48 ASA I-II patients were enrolled in thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2016-03, Vol.66 (2), p.140-144
Main Authors: Meco, Basak Ceyda, Bermede, Onat, Vural, Cagil, Cakmak, Atil, Alanoglu, Zekeriyya, Alkis, Neslihan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Analgesia pós-operatória
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Anesthesia, Spinal - methods
ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morfina
Morphine
Morphine - administration & dosage
Morphine - adverse effects
Pain, Postoperative - epidemiology
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Postoperative analgesia
Raquianestesia
Spinal anesthesia
Vomiting
Vomiting - epidemiology
Vômito
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine on postoperative analgesia, postoperative first mobilization and urination times and the severity of side effects. After Institutional Ethical Committee approval, 48 ASA I-II patients were enrolled in this randomized double-blinded study. Spinal anesthesia was performed with 0.1mg (Group I, n=22) or 0.4mg (Group II, n=26) ITM in addition to 7.5mg heavy bupivacaine. The first analgesic requirement, first mobilization and voiding times, and postoperative side effects were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 and p
ISSN:0104-0014
1806-907X
0104-0014
DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2014.08.002