Loading…

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer

Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237
Main Authors: Lee, Yoontaek, Lee, Chang Min, Park, Sungsoo, Kim, Jong-Han, Park, Seong-Heum
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453
container_end_page 1237
container_issue
container_start_page 1237
container_title Frontiers in oncology
container_volume 10
creator Lee, Yoontaek
Lee, Chang Min
Park, Sungsoo
Kim, Jong-Han
Park, Seong-Heum
description Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively; p = 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group ( p = 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group ( p = 0.006). Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fonc.2020.01237
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2437843735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1vEzEQXSEQrULPXH3kktT2eL8uSCFAiRSpHEBws8Zeu3G1ay-2A-rP4Z_iJBVqLVm25r154xm_qnrL6Aqg669t8HrFKacryji0L6pLzkEsewE_Xz65X1RXKd3TspqaMgqvqwvgXU2h5ZfV302YZowuBU-CJXlvyGZ03mkcye0h6zCZRD6Y_McYT7YpzKZwM47ZaYJ-IGuf3dPY2mPKYQqppK1tNpHssOiHpMNc4I8nIrkppGh0IT4QGyL5itkZnxP54fL-jBbyBr028U31yuKYzNXjuai-f_70bfNlubu92W7Wu6UW0OSl7Y1itKMNdG1NBVOmHxrF-tpSwUExC1YjYkd5Pdh2GBRv1MCgGQyW2YkaFtX2rDsEvJdzdBPGBxnQyVMgxDuJsbQ4GgkNR4YK6qa3wvZclSLYAwphgam2L1rvz1rzQU1m0KW3iOMz0eeId3t5F37LVjAG5WsW1btHgRh-HUzKcnJJm3FEb8IhSS6g7cqG47uvz1Rdppyisf_LMCqPPpFHn8ijT-TJJ_APpwC0MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437843735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><description>Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively; p = 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group ( p = 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group ( p = 0.006). Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32850372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>anastomosis ; antiperistaltic ; distal gastrectomy ; isoperistaltic ; Oncology ; total laparoscopic</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Lee, Lee, Park, Kim and Park. 2020 Lee, Lee, Park, Kim and Park</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411350/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411350/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><description>Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively; p = 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group ( p = 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group ( p = 0.006). Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</description><subject>anastomosis</subject><subject>antiperistaltic</subject><subject>distal gastrectomy</subject><subject>isoperistaltic</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>total laparoscopic</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1vEzEQXSEQrULPXH3kktT2eL8uSCFAiRSpHEBws8Zeu3G1ay-2A-rP4Z_iJBVqLVm25r154xm_qnrL6Aqg669t8HrFKacryji0L6pLzkEsewE_Xz65X1RXKd3TspqaMgqvqwvgXU2h5ZfV302YZowuBU-CJXlvyGZ03mkcye0h6zCZRD6Y_McYT7YpzKZwM47ZaYJ-IGuf3dPY2mPKYQqppK1tNpHssOiHpMNc4I8nIrkppGh0IT4QGyL5itkZnxP54fL-jBbyBr028U31yuKYzNXjuai-f_70bfNlubu92W7Wu6UW0OSl7Y1itKMNdG1NBVOmHxrF-tpSwUExC1YjYkd5Pdh2GBRv1MCgGQyW2YkaFtX2rDsEvJdzdBPGBxnQyVMgxDuJsbQ4GgkNR4YK6qa3wvZclSLYAwphgam2L1rvz1rzQU1m0KW3iOMz0eeId3t5F37LVjAG5WsW1btHgRh-HUzKcnJJm3FEb8IhSS6g7cqG47uvz1Rdppyisf_LMCqPPpFHn8ijT-TJJ_APpwC0MA</recordid><startdate>20200731</startdate><enddate>20200731</enddate><creator>Lee, Yoontaek</creator><creator>Lee, Chang Min</creator><creator>Park, Sungsoo</creator><creator>Kim, Jong-Han</creator><creator>Park, Seong-Heum</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200731</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><author>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>anastomosis</topic><topic>antiperistaltic</topic><topic>distal gastrectomy</topic><topic>isoperistaltic</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>total laparoscopic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Yoontaek</au><au>Lee, Chang Min</au><au>Park, Sungsoo</au><au>Kim, Jong-Han</au><au>Park, Seong-Heum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><date>2020-07-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>1237</spage><epage>1237</epage><pages>1237-1237</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively; p = 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group ( p = 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group ( p = 0.006). Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32850372</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2020.01237</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-943X
ispartof Frontiers in oncology, 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237
issn 2234-943X
2234-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79
source PubMed Central
subjects anastomosis
antiperistaltic
distal gastrectomy
isoperistaltic
Oncology
total laparoscopic
title Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20Between%20Isoperistaltic%20and%20Antiperistaltic%20Anastomoses%20After%20Laparoscopic%20Distal%20Gastrectomy%20for%20Patients%20With%20Gastric%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Lee,%20Yoontaek&rft.date=2020-07-31&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=1237&rft.epage=1237&rft.pages=1237-1237&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2020.01237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2437843735%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437843735&rft_id=info:pmid/32850372&rfr_iscdi=true