Loading…
Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer
Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in oncology 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453 |
container_end_page | 1237 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1237 |
container_title | Frontiers in oncology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Lee, Yoontaek Lee, Chang Min Park, Sungsoo Kim, Jong-Han Park, Seong-Heum |
description | Background:
No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results:
Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively;
p
= 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group (
p
= 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group (
p
= 0.006).
Conclusion:
In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fonc.2020.01237 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2437843735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1vEzEQXSEQrULPXH3kktT2eL8uSCFAiRSpHEBws8Zeu3G1ay-2A-rP4Z_iJBVqLVm25r154xm_qnrL6Aqg669t8HrFKacryji0L6pLzkEsewE_Xz65X1RXKd3TspqaMgqvqwvgXU2h5ZfV302YZowuBU-CJXlvyGZ03mkcye0h6zCZRD6Y_McYT7YpzKZwM47ZaYJ-IGuf3dPY2mPKYQqppK1tNpHssOiHpMNc4I8nIrkppGh0IT4QGyL5itkZnxP54fL-jBbyBr028U31yuKYzNXjuai-f_70bfNlubu92W7Wu6UW0OSl7Y1itKMNdG1NBVOmHxrF-tpSwUExC1YjYkd5Pdh2GBRv1MCgGQyW2YkaFtX2rDsEvJdzdBPGBxnQyVMgxDuJsbQ4GgkNR4YK6qa3wvZclSLYAwphgam2L1rvz1rzQU1m0KW3iOMz0eeId3t5F37LVjAG5WsW1btHgRh-HUzKcnJJm3FEb8IhSS6g7cqG47uvz1Rdppyisf_LMCqPPpFHn8ijT-TJJ_APpwC0MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437843735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results:
Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively;
p
= 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group (
p
= 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group (
p
= 0.006).
Conclusion:
In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32850372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>anastomosis ; antiperistaltic ; distal gastrectomy ; isoperistaltic ; Oncology ; total laparoscopic</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Lee, Lee, Park, Kim and Park. 2020 Lee, Lee, Park, Kim and Park</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411350/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411350/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><description>Background:
No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results:
Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively;
p
= 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group (
p
= 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group (
p
= 0.006).
Conclusion:
In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</description><subject>anastomosis</subject><subject>antiperistaltic</subject><subject>distal gastrectomy</subject><subject>isoperistaltic</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>total laparoscopic</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1vEzEQXSEQrULPXH3kktT2eL8uSCFAiRSpHEBws8Zeu3G1ay-2A-rP4Z_iJBVqLVm25r154xm_qnrL6Aqg669t8HrFKacryji0L6pLzkEsewE_Xz65X1RXKd3TspqaMgqvqwvgXU2h5ZfV302YZowuBU-CJXlvyGZ03mkcye0h6zCZRD6Y_McYT7YpzKZwM47ZaYJ-IGuf3dPY2mPKYQqppK1tNpHssOiHpMNc4I8nIrkppGh0IT4QGyL5itkZnxP54fL-jBbyBr028U31yuKYzNXjuai-f_70bfNlubu92W7Wu6UW0OSl7Y1itKMNdG1NBVOmHxrF-tpSwUExC1YjYkd5Pdh2GBRv1MCgGQyW2YkaFtX2rDsEvJdzdBPGBxnQyVMgxDuJsbQ4GgkNR4YK6qa3wvZclSLYAwphgam2L1rvz1rzQU1m0KW3iOMz0eeId3t5F37LVjAG5WsW1btHgRh-HUzKcnJJm3FEb8IhSS6g7cqG47uvz1Rdppyisf_LMCqPPpFHn8ijT-TJJ_APpwC0MA</recordid><startdate>20200731</startdate><enddate>20200731</enddate><creator>Lee, Yoontaek</creator><creator>Lee, Chang Min</creator><creator>Park, Sungsoo</creator><creator>Kim, Jong-Han</creator><creator>Park, Seong-Heum</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200731</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</title><author>Lee, Yoontaek ; Lee, Chang Min ; Park, Sungsoo ; Kim, Jong-Han ; Park, Seong-Heum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>anastomosis</topic><topic>antiperistaltic</topic><topic>distal gastrectomy</topic><topic>isoperistaltic</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>total laparoscopic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yoontaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sungsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seong-Heum</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Yoontaek</au><au>Lee, Chang Min</au><au>Park, Sungsoo</au><au>Kim, Jong-Han</au><au>Park, Seong-Heum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><date>2020-07-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>1237</spage><epage>1237</epage><pages>1237-1237</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>Background:
No consensus exists regarding the superiority of either of the two types of gastrointestinal anastomosis, which are isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) in patients with gastric cancer.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis between January 2014 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups according to the peristaltic direction of gastrointestinal anastomosis after TLDG. One group underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis (Iso group), and the other underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis (Anti group). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results:
Of the 148 patients who underwent TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis, 124 were included in the Iso group and 24 were included in the Anti group. The Anti and Iso groups showed no significant difference with regard to the incidence of internal hernia (0.0 vs. 6.5%, respectively;
p
= 0.355). The incidence of bile reflux was more frequent in the Iso group than in the Anti group (
p
= 0.010), but food stasis was more common in the Anti group than in the Iso group (
p
= 0.006).
Conclusion:
In gastric cancer patients who underwent TLDG in which postoperative adhesion was minimized, antiperistaltic anastomosis may have created a physiologic barrier in gastrointestinal continuity. However, a large-scale study is necessary to validate the relationship between the digestive stream and the peristaltic direction.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32850372</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2020.01237</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2234-943X |
ispartof | Frontiers in oncology, 2020-07, Vol.10, p.1237-1237 |
issn | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_362a1ab3569f4f92b5f0a93a44f31b79 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | anastomosis antiperistaltic distal gastrectomy isoperistaltic Oncology total laparoscopic |
title | Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20Between%20Isoperistaltic%20and%20Antiperistaltic%20Anastomoses%20After%20Laparoscopic%20Distal%20Gastrectomy%20for%20Patients%20With%20Gastric%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Lee,%20Yoontaek&rft.date=2020-07-31&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=1237&rft.epage=1237&rft.pages=1237-1237&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2020.01237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2437843735%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-f9eb108063875041be9d6b195f0423b1f3fcaaa8025df7ddb26bd136dea237453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437843735&rft_id=info:pmid/32850372&rfr_iscdi=true |