Loading…

Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner

The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Teaching and learning inquiry 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33
Main Authors: Healey, Ruth L, Bass, Tina, Caulfield, Jay, Hoffman, Adam, McGinn, Michelle K, Miller-Young, Janice, Haigh, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3
cites
container_end_page 33
container_issue 2
container_start_page 23
container_title Teaching and learning inquiry
container_volume 1
creator Healey, Ruth L
Bass, Tina
Caulfield, Jay
Hoffman, Adam
McGinn, Michelle K
Miller-Young, Janice
Haigh, Martin
description The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.
doi_str_mv 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1149973</ericid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2092823556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxSMEElXbjwCyxHkX_4vtcINqC622AqnlbCb2eONVmmzt7KHfHqeBRfgwnvEb_Z6sV1XvGV1zKqT4OCG4rkdIQxyejmu25msuXlVnnCm9ktro16deN2-ry5z3tByjlJL6rPr1BeOwI5upiw76_pncxcGj_0R-JHBTzLM4dUjuXTf2kHIXD2QM5GF2nTUYPNku7jsShzL_ZZE7GAZMF9WbAH3Gyz_3efXzevNw9W21_f715urzduWkktMKlW6NCcYHEwQ6V3PeUtCBoWuQOQDPRKCqFQ0ECKgoNioID23rpPEtiPPqZuH6Efb2kOIjpGc7QrQvD2PaWUhTdD1aoY1BXgeu0Enniw0XbQugVSlcycJ6t7AwRXdibW4Zk02jRdE_LPohjU9HzJPdj8c0lO9ZThtuuKhrVbbUsuXSmHPCcCIxal_Cs_-HZ5nlls94ecLv0U2Px4z_HGpONdX2fg51zpcJXvKUjfgNysiiWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092823556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-4779</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2167-4787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-4787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Decision Making ; Definitions ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Ethics ; Guidelines ; Higher education ; Holistic Approach ; Instruction ; Justice ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Matrices ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pragmatics ; Reflection ; Scholars ; Scholarship ; Semiotics ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teleology ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Teaching and learning inquiry, 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright© Trustees of Indiana University</rights><rights>Copyright International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092823556/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092823556?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33877,37012,43733,43880,44590,74221,74397,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1149973$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulfield, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Young, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><title>Teaching and learning inquiry</title><description>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Holistic Approach</subject><subject>Instruction</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Matrices</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>2167-4779</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxSMEElXbjwCyxHkX_4vtcINqC622AqnlbCb2eONVmmzt7KHfHqeBRfgwnvEb_Z6sV1XvGV1zKqT4OCG4rkdIQxyejmu25msuXlVnnCm9ktro16deN2-ry5z3tByjlJL6rPr1BeOwI5upiw76_pncxcGj_0R-JHBTzLM4dUjuXTf2kHIXD2QM5GF2nTUYPNku7jsShzL_ZZE7GAZMF9WbAH3Gyz_3efXzevNw9W21_f715urzduWkktMKlW6NCcYHEwQ6V3PeUtCBoWuQOQDPRKCqFQ0ECKgoNioID23rpPEtiPPqZuH6Efb2kOIjpGc7QrQvD2PaWUhTdD1aoY1BXgeu0Enniw0XbQugVSlcycJ6t7AwRXdibW4Zk02jRdE_LPohjU9HzJPdj8c0lO9ZThtuuKhrVbbUsuXSmHPCcCIxal_Cs_-HZ5nlls94ecLv0U2Px4z_HGpONdX2fg51zpcJXvKUjfgNysiiWg</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Healey, Ruth L</creator><creator>Bass, Tina</creator><creator>Caulfield, Jay</creator><creator>Hoffman, Adam</creator><creator>McGinn, Michelle K</creator><creator>Miller-Young, Janice</creator><creator>Haigh, Martin</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><general>International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)</general><general>University of Calgary</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><author>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Holistic Approach</topic><topic>Instruction</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Matrices</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulfield, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Young, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (CBCA)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Teaching and learning inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Healey, Ruth L</au><au>Bass, Tina</au><au>Caulfield, Jay</au><au>Hoffman, Adam</au><au>McGinn, Michelle K</au><au>Miller-Young, Janice</au><au>Haigh, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1149973</ericid><atitle>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</atitle><jtitle>Teaching and learning inquiry</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>23-33</pages><issn>2167-4779</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><eissn>2167-4787</eissn><abstract>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</abstract><cop>Calgary</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-4779
ispartof Teaching and learning inquiry, 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
2167-4787
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264
source JSTOR Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
subjects Case Studies
Decision Making
Definitions
Educational Facilities Improvement
Ethics
Guidelines
Higher education
Holistic Approach
Instruction
Justice
Learning
Learning Processes
Matrices
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Pragmatics
Reflection
Scholars
Scholarship
Semiotics
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Teleology
Traditions
title Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Being%20Ethically%20Minded:%20Practising%20the%20Scholarship%20of%20Teaching%20and%20Learning%20in%20an%20Ethical%20Manner&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20and%20learning%20inquiry&rft.au=Healey,%20Ruth%20L&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=23-33&rft.issn=2167-4779&rft.eissn=2167-4787&rft_id=info:doi/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2092823556%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092823556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1149973&rfr_iscdi=true