Loading…
Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner
The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL...
Saved in:
Published in: | Teaching and learning inquiry 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Teaching and learning inquiry |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Healey, Ruth L Bass, Tina Caulfield, Jay Hoffman, Adam McGinn, Michelle K Miller-Young, Janice Haigh, Martin |
description | The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1149973</ericid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2092823556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxSMEElXbjwCyxHkX_4vtcINqC622AqnlbCb2eONVmmzt7KHfHqeBRfgwnvEb_Z6sV1XvGV1zKqT4OCG4rkdIQxyejmu25msuXlVnnCm9ktro16deN2-ry5z3tByjlJL6rPr1BeOwI5upiw76_pncxcGj_0R-JHBTzLM4dUjuXTf2kHIXD2QM5GF2nTUYPNku7jsShzL_ZZE7GAZMF9WbAH3Gyz_3efXzevNw9W21_f715urzduWkktMKlW6NCcYHEwQ6V3PeUtCBoWuQOQDPRKCqFQ0ECKgoNioID23rpPEtiPPqZuH6Efb2kOIjpGc7QrQvD2PaWUhTdD1aoY1BXgeu0Enniw0XbQugVSlcycJ6t7AwRXdibW4Zk02jRdE_LPohjU9HzJPdj8c0lO9ZThtuuKhrVbbUsuXSmHPCcCIxal_Cs_-HZ5nlls94ecLv0U2Px4z_HGpONdX2fg51zpcJXvKUjfgNysiiWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092823556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-4779</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2167-4787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-4787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Decision Making ; Definitions ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Ethics ; Guidelines ; Higher education ; Holistic Approach ; Instruction ; Justice ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Matrices ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pragmatics ; Reflection ; Scholars ; Scholarship ; Semiotics ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teleology ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>Teaching and learning inquiry, 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright© Trustees of Indiana University</rights><rights>Copyright International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092823556/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2092823556?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21378,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,33877,37012,43733,43880,44590,74221,74397,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1149973$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulfield, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Young, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><title>Teaching and learning inquiry</title><description>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Holistic Approach</subject><subject>Instruction</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Matrices</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>2167-4779</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxSMEElXbjwCyxHkX_4vtcINqC622AqnlbCb2eONVmmzt7KHfHqeBRfgwnvEb_Z6sV1XvGV1zKqT4OCG4rkdIQxyejmu25msuXlVnnCm9ktro16deN2-ry5z3tByjlJL6rPr1BeOwI5upiw76_pncxcGj_0R-JHBTzLM4dUjuXTf2kHIXD2QM5GF2nTUYPNku7jsShzL_ZZE7GAZMF9WbAH3Gyz_3efXzevNw9W21_f715urzduWkktMKlW6NCcYHEwQ6V3PeUtCBoWuQOQDPRKCqFQ0ECKgoNioID23rpPEtiPPqZuH6Efb2kOIjpGc7QrQvD2PaWUhTdD1aoY1BXgeu0Enniw0XbQugVSlcycJ6t7AwRXdibW4Zk02jRdE_LPohjU9HzJPdj8c0lO9ZThtuuKhrVbbUsuXSmHPCcCIxal_Cs_-HZ5nlls94ecLv0U2Px4z_HGpONdX2fg51zpcJXvKUjfgNysiiWg</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Healey, Ruth L</creator><creator>Bass, Tina</creator><creator>Caulfield, Jay</creator><creator>Hoffman, Adam</creator><creator>McGinn, Michelle K</creator><creator>Miller-Young, Janice</creator><creator>Haigh, Martin</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><general>International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL)</general><general>University of Calgary</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</title><author>Healey, Ruth L ; Bass, Tina ; Caulfield, Jay ; Hoffman, Adam ; McGinn, Michelle K ; Miller-Young, Janice ; Haigh, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Holistic Approach</topic><topic>Instruction</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Matrices</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Healey, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caulfield, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Young, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haigh, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (CBCA)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Teaching and learning inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Healey, Ruth L</au><au>Bass, Tina</au><au>Caulfield, Jay</au><au>Hoffman, Adam</au><au>McGinn, Michelle K</au><au>Miller-Young, Janice</au><au>Haigh, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1149973</ericid><atitle>Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner</atitle><jtitle>Teaching and learning inquiry</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>23-33</pages><issn>2167-4779</issn><issn>2167-4787</issn><eissn>2167-4787</eissn><abstract>The authors propose a working definition of ethical Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), advance an ethical framework for SoTL inquiry, and present a case study that illustrates the complexity of ethical issues in SoTL. The Ethical SoTL Matrix is a flexible framework designed to support SoTL practitioners, particularly in the formative stages of their inquiries. Three dominant ethical traditions form the basis of the matrix: teleological or pragmatic, external, and deontological. The key message of the paper is that SoTL practitioners should reflect on different perspectives in their efforts to do what is right in any given situation. The matrix introduces three dominant ethical traditions, but SoTL practitioners may ultimately move beyond these traditions to explore a range of ethical considerations appropriate to their projects and disciplines.</abstract><cop>Calgary</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-4779 |
ispartof | Teaching and learning inquiry, 2013-01, Vol.1 (2), p.23-33 |
issn | 2167-4779 2167-4787 2167-4787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3788e25f26ec4cd0a723bbaa76baa264 |
source | JSTOR Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Case Studies Decision Making Definitions Educational Facilities Improvement Ethics Guidelines Higher education Holistic Approach Instruction Justice Learning Learning Processes Matrices Pedagogical Content Knowledge Pragmatics Reflection Scholars Scholarship Semiotics Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Teleology Traditions |
title | Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A04%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Being%20Ethically%20Minded:%20Practising%20the%20Scholarship%20of%20Teaching%20and%20Learning%20in%20an%20Ethical%20Manner&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20and%20learning%20inquiry&rft.au=Healey,%20Ruth%20L&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=23-33&rft.issn=2167-4779&rft.eissn=2167-4787&rft_id=info:doi/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2092823556%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e67b88f8df8f3ecc522b0a7f1ec9e1caad13f06b39afafe60e96f3dabbc48dba3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092823556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1149973&rfr_iscdi=true |