Loading…

The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles

The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters) 2024-10, Vol.24 (2), p.510-522
Main Authors: Sutrisno, Adi, Denistia, Karlina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 522
container_issue 2
container_start_page 510
container_title Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters)
container_volume 24
creator Sutrisno, Adi
Denistia, Karlina
description The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three distinct disciplines - business, engineering, and science. To accomplish this, we analyzed thirty papers published in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Makara Journal of Science, and Gadjahmada International Journal of Business. In total, 1453 relative clauses were collected and analyzed. A cross-classification analysis was performed to examine the distribution of relative clauses. The findings of the study indicate a preference among Indonesian writers to use non-reduced relative clauses, specifically those that serve as restrictive modifiers for objects. We also observe that the past participle is employed with greater frequency than the present participle. The results reveal that Indonesian authors prefer non-reduced relative clauses over reduced ones, opt for restrictive clauses over non-restrictive ones, and consistently favor relativizing the subject (S-form) in their relative clauses over the object (O-form). Our results also show that the choice of relative clauses is subject-specific, influenced by the distinct communicative requirements and preferences within each field. Our examination of relative clauses has provided insights into the syntactic choices, including their reduction status, restrictiveness, the use of participles, connectors, and the syntactic category modified by the clause.
doi_str_mv 10.24071/joll.v24i2.9097
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_37c6b89ed1cc43629911e6e9029dac2f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_37c6b89ed1cc43629911e6e9029dac2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_37c6b89ed1cc43629911e6e9029dac2f</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1497-24a50a5ce4ab9434e349c1fa8e1c49841b38c60b794b9397108652f520edf49e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1LAzEQhoMoWLR3j_kB3Zpksx_xtpaqlYJg23PIZmfblJhIslvoxd_uthVPMwzvPAzzIPRAyZRxUtDHvbd2emDcsKkgorhCI5aVJMnKorxGI8rp0OeC3qJxjHtCCBtSNOMj9LPeAd5EwL7Fc7e1Ju7wJ1jVmQPgmVV9hIjrI164xjuIRjlc9d3Oh_iEKzxTw-aq65sjNg4_99EMmTg5kYYOgnHbCVauwSttwGnA774PTllchc5oC_Ee3bTKRhj_1Tu0eZmvZ2_J8uN1MauWiaZcFAnjKiMq08BVLXjKIeVC01aVQDUXJad1Wuqc1IXgtUhFQUmZZ6zNGIGm5QLSO7S4cBuv9vI7mC8VjtIrI88DH7ZSXU6SaaHzuhTQUK15mjMhKIUcxPCzRmnWDixyYengYwzQ_vMokWcd8qRDnnXIk470FyIRfo0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Sutrisno, Adi ; Denistia, Karlina</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutrisno, Adi ; Denistia, Karlina</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three distinct disciplines - business, engineering, and science. To accomplish this, we analyzed thirty papers published in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Makara Journal of Science, and Gadjahmada International Journal of Business. In total, 1453 relative clauses were collected and analyzed. A cross-classification analysis was performed to examine the distribution of relative clauses. The findings of the study indicate a preference among Indonesian writers to use non-reduced relative clauses, specifically those that serve as restrictive modifiers for objects. We also observe that the past participle is employed with greater frequency than the present participle. The results reveal that Indonesian authors prefer non-reduced relative clauses over reduced ones, opt for restrictive clauses over non-restrictive ones, and consistently favor relativizing the subject (S-form) in their relative clauses over the object (O-form). Our results also show that the choice of relative clauses is subject-specific, influenced by the distinct communicative requirements and preferences within each field. Our examination of relative clauses has provided insights into the syntactic choices, including their reduction status, restrictiveness, the use of participles, connectors, and the syntactic category modified by the clause.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1410-5691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2580-5878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24071/joll.v24i2.9097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Prodi Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sanata Dharma</publisher><subject>non-reduced relative clause ; non-restrictive ; reduced relative clause ; relativizing ; restrictive</subject><ispartof>Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters), 2024-10, Vol.24 (2), p.510-522</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutrisno, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denistia, Karlina</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles</title><title>Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters)</title><description>The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three distinct disciplines - business, engineering, and science. To accomplish this, we analyzed thirty papers published in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Makara Journal of Science, and Gadjahmada International Journal of Business. In total, 1453 relative clauses were collected and analyzed. A cross-classification analysis was performed to examine the distribution of relative clauses. The findings of the study indicate a preference among Indonesian writers to use non-reduced relative clauses, specifically those that serve as restrictive modifiers for objects. We also observe that the past participle is employed with greater frequency than the present participle. The results reveal that Indonesian authors prefer non-reduced relative clauses over reduced ones, opt for restrictive clauses over non-restrictive ones, and consistently favor relativizing the subject (S-form) in their relative clauses over the object (O-form). Our results also show that the choice of relative clauses is subject-specific, influenced by the distinct communicative requirements and preferences within each field. Our examination of relative clauses has provided insights into the syntactic choices, including their reduction status, restrictiveness, the use of participles, connectors, and the syntactic category modified by the clause.</description><subject>non-reduced relative clause</subject><subject>non-restrictive</subject><subject>reduced relative clause</subject><subject>relativizing</subject><subject>restrictive</subject><issn>1410-5691</issn><issn>2580-5878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1LAzEQhoMoWLR3j_kB3Zpksx_xtpaqlYJg23PIZmfblJhIslvoxd_uthVPMwzvPAzzIPRAyZRxUtDHvbd2emDcsKkgorhCI5aVJMnKorxGI8rp0OeC3qJxjHtCCBtSNOMj9LPeAd5EwL7Fc7e1Ju7wJ1jVmQPgmVV9hIjrI164xjuIRjlc9d3Oh_iEKzxTw-aq65sjNg4_99EMmTg5kYYOgnHbCVauwSttwGnA774PTllchc5oC_Ee3bTKRhj_1Tu0eZmvZ2_J8uN1MauWiaZcFAnjKiMq08BVLXjKIeVC01aVQDUXJad1Wuqc1IXgtUhFQUmZZ6zNGIGm5QLSO7S4cBuv9vI7mC8VjtIrI88DH7ZSXU6SaaHzuhTQUK15mjMhKIUcxPCzRmnWDixyYengYwzQ_vMokWcd8qRDnnXIk470FyIRfo0</recordid><startdate>20241002</startdate><enddate>20241002</enddate><creator>Sutrisno, Adi</creator><creator>Denistia, Karlina</creator><general>Prodi Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sanata Dharma</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241002</creationdate><title>The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles</title><author>Sutrisno, Adi ; Denistia, Karlina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1497-24a50a5ce4ab9434e349c1fa8e1c49841b38c60b794b9397108652f520edf49e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>non-reduced relative clause</topic><topic>non-restrictive</topic><topic>reduced relative clause</topic><topic>relativizing</topic><topic>restrictive</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutrisno, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denistia, Karlina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutrisno, Adi</au><au>Denistia, Karlina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles</atitle><jtitle>Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters)</jtitle><date>2024-10-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>510-522</pages><issn>1410-5691</issn><eissn>2580-5878</eissn><abstract>The ability to effectively use relative clauses is pivotal in English journal articles, as it allows authors the flexibility to modify various noun phrases within sentences to convey clearer and more precise writing. This research explores the strategies employed by Indonesian authors from three distinct disciplines - business, engineering, and science. To accomplish this, we analyzed thirty papers published in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Makara Journal of Science, and Gadjahmada International Journal of Business. In total, 1453 relative clauses were collected and analyzed. A cross-classification analysis was performed to examine the distribution of relative clauses. The findings of the study indicate a preference among Indonesian writers to use non-reduced relative clauses, specifically those that serve as restrictive modifiers for objects. We also observe that the past participle is employed with greater frequency than the present participle. The results reveal that Indonesian authors prefer non-reduced relative clauses over reduced ones, opt for restrictive clauses over non-restrictive ones, and consistently favor relativizing the subject (S-form) in their relative clauses over the object (O-form). Our results also show that the choice of relative clauses is subject-specific, influenced by the distinct communicative requirements and preferences within each field. Our examination of relative clauses has provided insights into the syntactic choices, including their reduction status, restrictiveness, the use of participles, connectors, and the syntactic category modified by the clause.</abstract><pub>Prodi Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sanata Dharma</pub><doi>10.24071/joll.v24i2.9097</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1410-5691
ispartof Phenomena (Universitas Sanata Dharma. Department of English Letters), 2024-10, Vol.24 (2), p.510-522
issn 1410-5691
2580-5878
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_37c6b89ed1cc43629911e6e9029dac2f
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects non-reduced relative clause
non-restrictive
reduced relative clause
relativizing
restrictive
title The Use of English Relative Clauses by Indonesian Authors: A Case Study in Business, Engineering, and Science Journal Articles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A38%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20English%20Relative%20Clauses%20by%20Indonesian%20Authors:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Business,%20Engineering,%20and%20Science%20Journal%20Articles&rft.jtitle=Phenomena%20(Universitas%20Sanata%20Dharma.%20Department%20of%20English%20Letters)&rft.au=Sutrisno,%20Adi&rft.date=2024-10-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=510-522&rft.issn=1410-5691&rft.eissn=2580-5878&rft_id=info:doi/10.24071/joll.v24i2.9097&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_37c6b89ed1cc43629911e6e9029dac2f%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1497-24a50a5ce4ab9434e349c1fa8e1c49841b38c60b794b9397108652f520edf49e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true