Loading…
Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea
and are two well-known stem parasitic plant genera with reduced leaves and roots, inducing haustoria in their stems. Their similar appearance in the field has been recognized, but few comparative studies on their respective plant interactions are available. To compare their interactions, we conducte...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Plants (Basel) 2016-12, Vol.5 (4), p.43-43 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3 |
| container_end_page | 43 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 43 |
| container_title | Plants (Basel) |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Furuhashi, Takeshi Nakamura, Takemichi Iwase, Koji |
| description | and
are two well-known stem parasitic plant genera with reduced leaves and roots, inducing haustoria in their stems. Their similar appearance in the field has been recognized, but few comparative studies on their respective plant interactions are available. To compare their interactions, we conducted a metabolite analysis of both the
and the
interaction. We investigated the energy charge of the metabolites by UFLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography), and conducted GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) analysis for polar metabolites (e.g., saccharides, polyols) and steroids. The energy charge after parasitization changed considerably in
but not in
.
changed its steroid pattern during the plant interaction, whereas
did not. In the polar metabolite analysis, the laminaribiose increase after parasitization was conspicuous in
, but not in
. This metabolite profile difference points to different lifestyles and parasitic strategies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/plants5040043 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_388d1602481c4a67802f445a18411bab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_388d1602481c4a67802f445a18411bab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1852661193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstr3DAQxk1paUKaY6_F0EsvbvWW3EMhLH0sJDSQ3sVYHicKXmsryQv730ebTcNuL60Q6DE_Pumbmap6S8lHzlvyaT3ClJMkghDBX1SnjDHeaC30y4P9SXWe0j0pw5RJ1evqhOlWUEX4abW5mGDcJp_qMNRXmKELo8-Yaj_VNxlX9TVESD57V1_vHquXU8YILvswpc-Hp53AYk5uztBchVWIvXdQbzCmOdULSGmb76BZrksI4U31aoAx4fnTelbdfPv6a_Gjufz5fbm4uGycFDo3Qzcg7xWHVnEHoLnCnjKnkGvSyoGiFgJRGkmN0koabFtA6DXplHaOn1XLvWof4N6uo19B3NoA3j5ehHhrIRZrI1puTF8ywoShToDShrBBCAnUCEo76IrWl73Weu5W2DuccoTxSPQ4Mvk7exs2VtLWUMKLwIcngRh-z5iyXfnkcCxZxTAny3ipSquZJP9Ei1vDOZNS_AcqmVKUtrsPvP8LvQ9zLOV_pAynWitaqGZPuRhSijg8W6TE7prOHjVd4d8d5uWZ_tNi_AHaCtOa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858317761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Furuhashi, Takeshi ; Nakamura, Takemichi ; Iwase, Koji</creator><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Takeshi ; Nakamura, Takemichi ; Iwase, Koji</creatorcontrib><description>and
are two well-known stem parasitic plant genera with reduced leaves and roots, inducing haustoria in their stems. Their similar appearance in the field has been recognized, but few comparative studies on their respective plant interactions are available. To compare their interactions, we conducted a metabolite analysis of both the
and the
interaction. We investigated the energy charge of the metabolites by UFLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography), and conducted GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) analysis for polar metabolites (e.g., saccharides, polyols) and steroids. The energy charge after parasitization changed considerably in
but not in
.
changed its steroid pattern during the plant interaction, whereas
did not. In the polar metabolite analysis, the laminaribiose increase after parasitization was conspicuous in
, but not in
. This metabolite profile difference points to different lifestyles and parasitic strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/plants5040043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27941603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>carbohydrates ; Cassytha ; Comparative studies ; comparative study ; Cuscuta ; energy ; Gas chromatography ; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry ; haustoria ; high performance liquid chromatography ; leaves ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolites ; Parasitic plants ; parasitism ; plant interaction ; polyols ; roots ; Saccharides ; stem parasitic plant ; stems ; Steroids ; ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><ispartof>Plants (Basel), 2016-12, Vol.5 (4), p.43-43</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2016</rights><rights>2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6033-6927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1858317761/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1858317761?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25730,27900,27901,36988,36989,44565,53765,53767,75095</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27941603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Takemichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwase, Koji</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea</title><title>Plants (Basel)</title><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><description>and
are two well-known stem parasitic plant genera with reduced leaves and roots, inducing haustoria in their stems. Their similar appearance in the field has been recognized, but few comparative studies on their respective plant interactions are available. To compare their interactions, we conducted a metabolite analysis of both the
and the
interaction. We investigated the energy charge of the metabolites by UFLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography), and conducted GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) analysis for polar metabolites (e.g., saccharides, polyols) and steroids. The energy charge after parasitization changed considerably in
but not in
.
changed its steroid pattern during the plant interaction, whereas
did not. In the polar metabolite analysis, the laminaribiose increase after parasitization was conspicuous in
, but not in
. This metabolite profile difference points to different lifestyles and parasitic strategies.</description><subject>carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cassytha</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>Cuscuta</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>gas chromatography-mass spectrometry</subject><subject>haustoria</subject><subject>high performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Parasitic plants</subject><subject>parasitism</subject><subject>plant interaction</subject><subject>polyols</subject><subject>roots</subject><subject>Saccharides</subject><subject>stem parasitic plant</subject><subject>stems</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</subject><issn>2223-7747</issn><issn>2223-7747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstr3DAQxk1paUKaY6_F0EsvbvWW3EMhLH0sJDSQ3sVYHicKXmsryQv730ebTcNuL60Q6DE_Pumbmap6S8lHzlvyaT3ClJMkghDBX1SnjDHeaC30y4P9SXWe0j0pw5RJ1evqhOlWUEX4abW5mGDcJp_qMNRXmKELo8-Yaj_VNxlX9TVESD57V1_vHquXU8YILvswpc-Hp53AYk5uztBchVWIvXdQbzCmOdULSGmb76BZrksI4U31aoAx4fnTelbdfPv6a_Gjufz5fbm4uGycFDo3Qzcg7xWHVnEHoLnCnjKnkGvSyoGiFgJRGkmN0koabFtA6DXplHaOn1XLvWof4N6uo19B3NoA3j5ehHhrIRZrI1puTF8ywoShToDShrBBCAnUCEo76IrWl73Weu5W2DuccoTxSPQ4Mvk7exs2VtLWUMKLwIcngRh-z5iyXfnkcCxZxTAny3ipSquZJP9Ei1vDOZNS_AcqmVKUtrsPvP8LvQ9zLOV_pAynWitaqGZPuRhSijg8W6TE7prOHjVd4d8d5uWZ_tNi_AHaCtOa</recordid><startdate>20161207</startdate><enddate>20161207</enddate><creator>Furuhashi, Takeshi</creator><creator>Nakamura, Takemichi</creator><creator>Iwase, Koji</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-6927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161207</creationdate><title>Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea</title><author>Furuhashi, Takeshi ; Nakamura, Takemichi ; Iwase, Koji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cassytha</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>Cuscuta</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>gas chromatography-mass spectrometry</topic><topic>haustoria</topic><topic>high performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Parasitic plants</topic><topic>parasitism</topic><topic>plant interaction</topic><topic>polyols</topic><topic>roots</topic><topic>Saccharides</topic><topic>stem parasitic plant</topic><topic>stems</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>ultra-performance liquid chromatography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Takemichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwase, Koji</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furuhashi, Takeshi</au><au>Nakamura, Takemichi</au><au>Iwase, Koji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea</atitle><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><date>2016-12-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>43-43</pages><issn>2223-7747</issn><eissn>2223-7747</eissn><abstract>and
are two well-known stem parasitic plant genera with reduced leaves and roots, inducing haustoria in their stems. Their similar appearance in the field has been recognized, but few comparative studies on their respective plant interactions are available. To compare their interactions, we conducted a metabolite analysis of both the
and the
interaction. We investigated the energy charge of the metabolites by UFLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography), and conducted GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) analysis for polar metabolites (e.g., saccharides, polyols) and steroids. The energy charge after parasitization changed considerably in
but not in
.
changed its steroid pattern during the plant interaction, whereas
did not. In the polar metabolite analysis, the laminaribiose increase after parasitization was conspicuous in
, but not in
. This metabolite profile difference points to different lifestyles and parasitic strategies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>27941603</pmid><doi>10.3390/plants5040043</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-6927</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2223-7747 |
| ispartof | Plants (Basel), 2016-12, Vol.5 (4), p.43-43 |
| issn | 2223-7747 2223-7747 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_388d1602481c4a67802f445a18411bab |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
| subjects | carbohydrates Cassytha Comparative studies comparative study Cuscuta energy Gas chromatography gas chromatography-mass spectrometry haustoria high performance liquid chromatography leaves Liquid chromatography Mass spectrometry Metabolites Parasitic plants parasitism plant interaction polyols roots Saccharides stem parasitic plant stems Steroids ultra-performance liquid chromatography |
| title | Analysis of Metabolites in Stem Parasitic Plant Interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T11%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Metabolites%20in%20Stem%20Parasitic%20Plant%20Interactions:%20Interaction%20of%20Cuscuta-Momordica%20versus%20Cassytha-Ipomoea&rft.jtitle=Plants%20(Basel)&rft.au=Furuhashi,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2016-12-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=43-43&rft.issn=2223-7747&rft.eissn=2223-7747&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/plants5040043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1852661193%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-fbfe3d63a963caa736ed12c6e37095f1e744ee5851867658e99aead70b67cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858317761&rft_id=info:pmid/27941603&rfr_iscdi=true |