Drivers, alternatives, knowledge, and perceptions towards antimicrobial use among Tennessee beef cattle producers: a qualitative study

• Published in: BMC veterinary research 2019-01, Vol.15 (1), p.16-16, Article 16
• Main Authors: Ekakoro, John E, Caldwell, Marc, Strand, Elizabeth B, Okafor, Chika C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agriculture; Animal diseases; Animal welfare; Animals; Antibiotics; Antimicrobial agents; Antimicrobial resistance; Antimicrobial use; Beef; Beef cattle; Beef industry; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Bovidae; Cattle industry; Channeling; Consultation; Continuing education; Dairy farmers; Disease prevention; Drug efficacy; Drug resistance; Economic factors; Education; Farmers; Farms; Feed efficiency; Feeds; Focus group discussions; Focus groups; Food; Interviews; Legal fees; Management techniques; Meetings; Microbial drug resistance; Motor vehicle drivers; Nutrition; Packaging; Pathogens; Perceptions; Public health; Qualitative research; Qualitative study; Studies; Tennessee-beef cattle producers; Vaccination; Vaccines; Veterinarians; Veterinary anti-infective agents; Veterinary feed directive; Veterinary medicine; Zoonoses
• ISSN: 1746-6148; 1746-6148
• DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1731-6

In recent years, there has been an increased awareness of antimicrobial resistance in both animals and humans, which has triggered concerns over non-judicious antimicrobial use. In the United States, antimicrobial use in food-producing animals for growth promotion or improved feed efficiency is perceived as non-judicious. To facilitate judicious antimicrobial use, the United States Food and Drug Administration implemented the Veterinary Feed Directive, effective from January 1, 2017. Interventions, such as the VFD, designed to ensure the judicious use of antimicrobials among cattle producers may be more effective if the factors that inform and influence producer AMU practices are addressed. The specific objectives of this study were to determine the following among Tennessee beef cattle producers: (1) the most common drivers for using antimicrobials, (2) the perceived alternatives to antimicrobials, (3) the knowledge and perceptions regarding antimicrobial resistance, and (4) the preferred avenues for receiving information on prudent antimicrobial use. A total of 5 focus group meetings with beef producers were conducted in East, Middle, and West Tennessee. Each focus group was video recorded and thematic analysis was performed using NVivo. The factors that producers considered to drive antimicrobial use were the type of cattle operation, disease and animal welfare, economic factors, veterinarian consultation, producer's experience and peer support, Veterinary Feed Directive, and perceived drug efficacy. Vaccination, proper nutrition, and other good management practices were considered alternatives to antimicrobial use. To encourage vaccine use among small producers, participants suggested packaging vaccines into smaller quantities. Antimicrobial resistance was perceived to be a problem affecting animal and public health. Participants suggested additional education for cattle producers on the prudent use of antimicrobials as a measure for improving antimicrobial use. The veterinarian, producer associations and meetings, and county extension agents emerged as trusted avenues for channeling information on prudent antimicrobial use to cattle producers. Several factors drive antimicrobial use among cattle producers in Tennessee. Participants generally perceived their antimicrobial use to be discreet and only when necessary. More awareness of drivers for the development of antimicrobial resistance and continuing education on prudent antimicrobial use is needed f