Loading…

Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing

The environmental sampling of layer housing systems is essential to identifying potential pathogens that are of concern to human health. To identify the natural occurrence of pathogens (Listeria, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) at various locations in a cage-free aviary housing system, swabs were col...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poultry science 2023-02, Vol.102 (2), p.102381-102381, Article 102381
Main Authors: Garcia, J.S., Jones, D.R., Gast, R.K., Karcher, D.M., Erasmus, M.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a67a3b71cea9d8cb3d3a3bf4e3f753c7a79506e6d5313e287d8503e67ee0e1733
container_end_page 102381
container_issue 2
container_start_page 102381
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 102
creator Garcia, J.S.
Jones, D.R.
Gast, R.K.
Karcher, D.M.
Erasmus, M.A.
description The environmental sampling of layer housing systems is essential to identifying potential pathogens that are of concern to human health. To identify the natural occurrence of pathogens (Listeria, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) at various locations in a cage-free aviary housing system, swabs were collected when hens were 22 to 39 wks of age. Duplicate environmental swabs were taken and inoculated with a low dose (101 cfu) Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and examined for the recovery of SE from environmental samples. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) and Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) varied between the environmental sample types taken: concrete dust, drag swabs, egg belt dust, manure belt scraper swabs, and wall dust. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) was the highest (70.0%) at the beginning of the study (22 wk) and decreased over time. Detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.001) was also the highest at 22 wk, however the decrease over time was more gradual. Interestingly, detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) was the greatest in concrete dust samples (96.25%), which can be attributed to the presence of rodent excreta in the samples. Drag swabs and manure belt scraper swabs were the best sampling types for high detection of Listeria and Campylobacter. It should be noted that Listeria recovered was not of human health concern. No naturally occurring Salmonella was identified in this study. The recovery of the SE inoculum increased over time, reaching the greatest recovery in drag (81.25%; P < 0.0001), egg belt dust (100.00%; P < 0.0001) and wall dust swabs (100.00%; P < 0.0001) by 39 wk. This high rate of SE recovery occurred just before US mandatory SE environmental monitoring at 40 to 45 wks of age. Based on this study, the use of drag and manure belt scraper swabs are effective in detecting Listeria and Campylobacter in cage-free aviary housing. Along with good pest management, the occurrence of pathogens could be monitored and reduced in laying hen flocks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102381
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_393650fff5a5435783f376d7bb82af86</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032579122006757</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_393650fff5a5435783f376d7bb82af86</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2834261312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a67a3b71cea9d8cb3d3a3bf4e3f753c7a79506e6d5313e287d8503e67ee0e1733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdigLNlksH3HdiIkJFQVqFSJDawtx77OOErswc6MxI7X4PV4EjykVHSDvPDfuZ-vz6mql5RsKaHizbg95HHLCGNlz6Clj6oN5Yw3QCV9XG0IAdZw2dGL6lnOIyGMCiGfVhcgeBnQbip9HU4-xTBjWPRUZz0fJh-GesZlH23-9eNn7YObjhgM1jHUFhc0iy-r6OqDLqIBQy6a2ugBG5cQa33yOn2v9_GYC-p59cTpKeOLu_my-vrh-svVp-b288ebq_e3jdkBWxotpIZeUoO6s63pwULZux2CkxyM1LLjRKCwHCgga6VtOQEUEpEglQCX1c3KtVGP6pD8XJpQUXv15yCmQem0eDOhgq4YQJxzXPMdcNmCAyms7PuWadeKwnq3sg7HfkZrijlJTw-gD2-C36shnlTXEkq7czOv7wApfjtiXtTss8Fp0gGLLYq1sGOCAmVFSlepSTHnhO7-GUrUOWZVfpNHdY5ZrTGXmlf_9ndf8TfXIni7CrA4fvKYVDb-nKH1qeRXLPH_wf8GM4-7Cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834261312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Karcher, D.M. ; Erasmus, M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Karcher, D.M. ; Erasmus, M.A.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The environmental sampling of layer housing systems is essential to identifying potential pathogens that are of concern to human health. To identify the natural occurrence of pathogens (Listeria, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) at various locations in a cage-free aviary housing system, swabs were collected when hens were 22 to 39 wks of age. Duplicate environmental swabs were taken and inoculated with a low dose (101 cfu) Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and examined for the recovery of SE from environmental samples. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) and Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) varied between the environmental sample types taken: concrete dust, drag swabs, egg belt dust, manure belt scraper swabs, and wall dust. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) was the highest (70.0%) at the beginning of the study (22 wk) and decreased over time. Detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.001) was also the highest at 22 wk, however the decrease over time was more gradual. Interestingly, detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) was the greatest in concrete dust samples (96.25%), which can be attributed to the presence of rodent excreta in the samples. Drag swabs and manure belt scraper swabs were the best sampling types for high detection of Listeria and Campylobacter. It should be noted that Listeria recovered was not of human health concern. No naturally occurring Salmonella was identified in this study. The recovery of the SE inoculum increased over time, reaching the greatest recovery in drag (81.25%; P < 0.0001), egg belt dust (100.00%; P < 0.0001) and wall dust swabs (100.00%; P < 0.0001) by 39 wk. This high rate of SE recovery occurred just before US mandatory SE environmental monitoring at 40 to 45 wks of age. Based on this study, the use of drag and manure belt scraper swabs are effective in detecting Listeria and Campylobacter in cage-free aviary housing. Along with good pest management, the occurrence of pathogens could be monitored and reduced in laying hen flocks.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102381</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36565638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; aviaries ; cage-free aviary ; Campylobacter ; Chickens ; Dust ; eggs ; environmental sampling ; excreta ; Female ; hens ; Housing, Animal ; human health ; Humans ; inoculum ; Listeria ; Manure ; MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY ; pest management ; Poultry Diseases - epidemiology ; rodents ; salmonella ; Salmonella Enteritidis ; Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2023-02, Vol.102 (2), p.102381-102381, Article 102381</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a67a3b71cea9d8cb3d3a3bf4e3f753c7a79506e6d5313e287d8503e67ee0e1733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8863-8559 ; 0000-0002-0760-4283 ; 0000-0001-6233-889X ; 0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579122006757$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gast, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus, M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The environmental sampling of layer housing systems is essential to identifying potential pathogens that are of concern to human health. To identify the natural occurrence of pathogens (Listeria, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) at various locations in a cage-free aviary housing system, swabs were collected when hens were 22 to 39 wks of age. Duplicate environmental swabs were taken and inoculated with a low dose (101 cfu) Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and examined for the recovery of SE from environmental samples. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) and Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) varied between the environmental sample types taken: concrete dust, drag swabs, egg belt dust, manure belt scraper swabs, and wall dust. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) was the highest (70.0%) at the beginning of the study (22 wk) and decreased over time. Detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.001) was also the highest at 22 wk, however the decrease over time was more gradual. Interestingly, detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) was the greatest in concrete dust samples (96.25%), which can be attributed to the presence of rodent excreta in the samples. Drag swabs and manure belt scraper swabs were the best sampling types for high detection of Listeria and Campylobacter. It should be noted that Listeria recovered was not of human health concern. No naturally occurring Salmonella was identified in this study. The recovery of the SE inoculum increased over time, reaching the greatest recovery in drag (81.25%; P < 0.0001), egg belt dust (100.00%; P < 0.0001) and wall dust swabs (100.00%; P < 0.0001) by 39 wk. This high rate of SE recovery occurred just before US mandatory SE environmental monitoring at 40 to 45 wks of age. Based on this study, the use of drag and manure belt scraper swabs are effective in detecting Listeria and Campylobacter in cage-free aviary housing. Along with good pest management, the occurrence of pathogens could be monitored and reduced in laying hen flocks.]]></description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>aviaries</subject><subject>cage-free aviary</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>eggs</subject><subject>environmental sampling</subject><subject>excreta</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hens</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>human health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inoculum</subject><subject>Listeria</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY</subject><subject>pest management</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>rodents</subject><subject>salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella Enteritidis</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEokPhAdigLNlksH3HdiIkJFQVqFSJDawtx77OOErswc6MxI7X4PV4EjykVHSDvPDfuZ-vz6mql5RsKaHizbg95HHLCGNlz6Clj6oN5Yw3QCV9XG0IAdZw2dGL6lnOIyGMCiGfVhcgeBnQbip9HU4-xTBjWPRUZz0fJh-GesZlH23-9eNn7YObjhgM1jHUFhc0iy-r6OqDLqIBQy6a2ugBG5cQa33yOn2v9_GYC-p59cTpKeOLu_my-vrh-svVp-b288ebq_e3jdkBWxotpIZeUoO6s63pwULZux2CkxyM1LLjRKCwHCgga6VtOQEUEpEglQCX1c3KtVGP6pD8XJpQUXv15yCmQem0eDOhgq4YQJxzXPMdcNmCAyms7PuWadeKwnq3sg7HfkZrijlJTw-gD2-C36shnlTXEkq7czOv7wApfjtiXtTss8Fp0gGLLYq1sGOCAmVFSlepSTHnhO7-GUrUOWZVfpNHdY5ZrTGXmlf_9ndf8TfXIni7CrA4fvKYVDb-nKH1qeRXLPH_wf8GM4-7Cg</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Garcia, J.S.</creator><creator>Jones, D.R.</creator><creator>Gast, R.K.</creator><creator>Karcher, D.M.</creator><creator>Erasmus, M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-889X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing</title><author>Garcia, J.S. ; Jones, D.R. ; Gast, R.K. ; Karcher, D.M. ; Erasmus, M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a67a3b71cea9d8cb3d3a3bf4e3f753c7a79506e6d5313e287d8503e67ee0e1733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>aviaries</topic><topic>cage-free aviary</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>eggs</topic><topic>environmental sampling</topic><topic>excreta</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hens</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>human health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inoculum</topic><topic>Listeria</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY</topic><topic>pest management</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>rodents</topic><topic>salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella Enteritidis</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gast, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karcher, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erasmus, M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, J.S.</au><au>Jones, D.R.</au><au>Gast, R.K.</au><au>Karcher, D.M.</au><au>Erasmus, M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>102381</spage><epage>102381</epage><pages>102381-102381</pages><artnum>102381</artnum><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The environmental sampling of layer housing systems is essential to identifying potential pathogens that are of concern to human health. To identify the natural occurrence of pathogens (Listeria, Campylobacter, and Salmonella) at various locations in a cage-free aviary housing system, swabs were collected when hens were 22 to 39 wks of age. Duplicate environmental swabs were taken and inoculated with a low dose (101 cfu) Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and examined for the recovery of SE from environmental samples. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) and Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) varied between the environmental sample types taken: concrete dust, drag swabs, egg belt dust, manure belt scraper swabs, and wall dust. Detection of Listeria (P < 0.0001) was the highest (70.0%) at the beginning of the study (22 wk) and decreased over time. Detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.001) was also the highest at 22 wk, however the decrease over time was more gradual. Interestingly, detection of Campylobacter (P < 0.0001) was the greatest in concrete dust samples (96.25%), which can be attributed to the presence of rodent excreta in the samples. Drag swabs and manure belt scraper swabs were the best sampling types for high detection of Listeria and Campylobacter. It should be noted that Listeria recovered was not of human health concern. No naturally occurring Salmonella was identified in this study. The recovery of the SE inoculum increased over time, reaching the greatest recovery in drag (81.25%; P < 0.0001), egg belt dust (100.00%; P < 0.0001) and wall dust swabs (100.00%; P < 0.0001) by 39 wk. This high rate of SE recovery occurred just before US mandatory SE environmental monitoring at 40 to 45 wks of age. Based on this study, the use of drag and manure belt scraper swabs are effective in detecting Listeria and Campylobacter in cage-free aviary housing. Along with good pest management, the occurrence of pathogens could be monitored and reduced in laying hen flocks.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36565638</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.psj.2022.102381</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-4283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-889X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-6974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2023-02, Vol.102 (2), p.102381-102381, Article 102381
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_393650fff5a5435783f376d7bb82af86
source PubMed (Medline); ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Animal Husbandry
Animals
aviaries
cage-free aviary
Campylobacter
Chickens
Dust
eggs
environmental sampling
excreta
Female
hens
Housing, Animal
human health
Humans
inoculum
Listeria
Manure
MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY
pest management
Poultry Diseases - epidemiology
rodents
salmonella
Salmonella Enteritidis
Salmonella Infections, Animal - epidemiology
title Environmental sampling methods’ influence on detection of pathogens in cage-free aviary housing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20sampling%20methods%E2%80%99%20influence%20on%20detection%20of%20pathogens%20in%20cage-free%20aviary%20housing&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Garcia,%20J.S.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=102381&rft.epage=102381&rft.pages=102381-102381&rft.artnum=102381&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102381&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2834261312%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a67a3b71cea9d8cb3d3a3bf4e3f753c7a79506e6d5313e287d8503e67ee0e1733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834261312&rft_id=info:pmid/36565638&rfr_iscdi=true