Towards coexistence: Can people's attitudes explain their willingness to live with Sumatran elephants in Indonesia?

Understanding coexistence between humans and threatened wildlife is a central focus in conservation. Way Kambas National Park in Sumatra Island, Indonesia, harbors one of the largest populations of the critically endangered Sumatran elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus). The people who live alongsid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation science and practice 2021-10, Vol.3 (10), p.n/a
Main Authors: Ardiantiono, Sugiyo, Johnson, Paul J., Lubis, Muhammad Irfansyah, Amama, Fahrul, Sukatmoko, Marthy, William, Zimmermann, Alexandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitudes
Coexistence
Crops
elephant crop foraging
Elephants
Endangered species
Foraging behavior
human behavior
human–wildlife coexistence
Mitigation
National parks
Population
Questionnaires
Safety
social science
Wildlife conservation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding coexistence between humans and threatened wildlife is a central focus in conservation. Way Kambas National Park in Sumatra Island, Indonesia, harbors one of the largest populations of the critically endangered Sumatran elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus). The people who live alongside this population are affected by intensive crop foraging. Our study investigated the factors which influenced attitudes toward elephants. We then evaluated the implications of reported attitudes for future willingness to live with elephants. We surveyed 660 respondents in 22 villages around the park. People generally reported positive attitudes toward elephants (smartness 95%, usefulness 62%, importance 57%, and pleasantness 53%), apart from where human safety was concerned (safety 11%). Each dimension of attitude was explained by different factors including age, gender, knowledge of elephants, and distance to crop foraging locations. Most respondents (62%) expressed no willingness to coexist with elephants. Such willingness was lower when elephants were perceived to be more dangerous, but higher if beliefs in the benefits of elephants were greater. Efforts to improve crop foraging mitigation practice and to increase people's awareness of elephant benefits may promote support for their conservation. Through this study, we advocate the integration of social science to promote human–wildlife coexistence strategies, an approach that is currently limited in Indonesia.
ISSN:2578-4854
2578-4854
DOI:10.1111/csp2.520