Loading…
Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review
Pathogens and parasites (henceforth “pathogens”) can make up a large percentage of the biomass found in ecosystems, and therefore, their impacts on ecosystem processes should be prominent. Pathogens influence ecosystem processes by affecting the abundance or phenotype of hosts and through direct con...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2020-05, Vol.11 (5), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Fischhoff, Ilya R. Huang, Tao Hamilton, Stephen K. Han, Barbara A. LaDeau, Shannon L. Ostfeld, Richard S. Rosi, Emma J. Solomon, Christopher T. |
description | Pathogens and parasites (henceforth “pathogens”) can make up a large percentage of the biomass found in ecosystems, and therefore, their impacts on ecosystem processes should be prominent. Pathogens influence ecosystem processes by affecting the abundance or phenotype of hosts and through direct contributions to ecosystem production. However, there has been little quantitative synthesis of the relative effect sizes of these impacts on ecosystem processes. This study presents a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pathogen effects on primary production, secondary production, and biogeochemical cycles. We find that the effects of pathogens on ecosystem processes were greater where pathogens influenced host or community abundance or biomass than when they influenced phenotypes. Pathogen impacts on primary production were larger than on secondary production or biogeochemical cycles. By contrast, we detected no general differences in effect sizes across host or pathogen taxon or ecosystem type (terrestrial vs. aquatic). While we have found potential evidence of publication bias against negative results, a well‐known issue in meta‐analyses, our work nonetheless shows that the available literature under‐represents some taxa and geographic regions. To better understand the extent and magnitude of pathogen impacts on ecosystem processes, future research is needed in four areas. First, research is needed on the most understudied systems, including bacteria and viruses, as well as tropical ecosystems. A second priority is research seeking to understand how key components of ecosystem variation, including age (time of ecological continuity), productivity, and species diversity and composition, may interact to mediate pathogen impacts. Third, we suggest expanding on work examining how pathogen effects are influenced by climate change, species introductions, deforestation, and other human impacts. Fourth, we expect that host coinfection influences ecosystem processes in ways that cannot always be predicted based on studies of single infections. To enable others to build on this work, we make available the data we extracted from the literature, with the code for computing effect sizes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecs2.3057 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39863802bc86489c8003efbc8d9b04be</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_39863802bc86489c8003efbc8d9b04be</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2407938703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OAjEUhRujiQRZ-AaTuHIxcNvOT8cdIahEEk3UddPp3MEhMIW2QHh7C2OMG7vpbfP1nNNDyC2FIQVgI9SODTmk-QXpMZpCLAqWXv6Zr8nAuSWElSa5SHiPvLwpq1zjMVJtFW2U_zILbCOsa9TeRSaM2rij87iONtZodA7dQzSOtjvV-sYr3-wxsrhv8HBDrmq1cjj42fvk83H6MXmO569Ps8l4HmteiDwWTChdQSJEyikrQ6xEi0xnUNVcZ3mGqEI0zHWRUJUC1nla1rSkoCmrmBK8T2adbmXUUm5ss1b2KI1q5PnC2IVU1jd6hTIYZlwAK4NDIgotADjW4VQVJSQlBq27Tit8brtD5-XS7Gwb4kuWQF5wkQMP1H1HaWucs1j_ulKQp-rlqXp5qj6wo449NCs8_g_K6eSdnV98A0Keg8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407938703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Fischhoff, Ilya R. ; Huang, Tao ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Han, Barbara A. ; LaDeau, Shannon L. ; Ostfeld, Richard S. ; Rosi, Emma J. ; Solomon, Christopher T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischhoff, Ilya R. ; Huang, Tao ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Han, Barbara A. ; LaDeau, Shannon L. ; Ostfeld, Richard S. ; Rosi, Emma J. ; Solomon, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><description>Pathogens and parasites (henceforth “pathogens”) can make up a large percentage of the biomass found in ecosystems, and therefore, their impacts on ecosystem processes should be prominent. Pathogens influence ecosystem processes by affecting the abundance or phenotype of hosts and through direct contributions to ecosystem production. However, there has been little quantitative synthesis of the relative effect sizes of these impacts on ecosystem processes. This study presents a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pathogen effects on primary production, secondary production, and biogeochemical cycles. We find that the effects of pathogens on ecosystem processes were greater where pathogens influenced host or community abundance or biomass than when they influenced phenotypes. Pathogen impacts on primary production were larger than on secondary production or biogeochemical cycles. By contrast, we detected no general differences in effect sizes across host or pathogen taxon or ecosystem type (terrestrial vs. aquatic). While we have found potential evidence of publication bias against negative results, a well‐known issue in meta‐analyses, our work nonetheless shows that the available literature under‐represents some taxa and geographic regions. To better understand the extent and magnitude of pathogen impacts on ecosystem processes, future research is needed in four areas. First, research is needed on the most understudied systems, including bacteria and viruses, as well as tropical ecosystems. A second priority is research seeking to understand how key components of ecosystem variation, including age (time of ecological continuity), productivity, and species diversity and composition, may interact to mediate pathogen impacts. Third, we suggest expanding on work examining how pathogen effects are influenced by climate change, species introductions, deforestation, and other human impacts. Fourth, we expect that host coinfection influences ecosystem processes in ways that cannot always be predicted based on studies of single infections. To enable others to build on this work, we make available the data we extracted from the literature, with the code for computing effect sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>biogeochemical cycles ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Deforestation ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Environmental impact ; Genotype & phenotype ; Introduced species ; Invertebrates ; Meta-analysis ; parasite ; Parasites ; pathogen ; Pathogens ; Primary production ; secondary production ; Species diversity ; Systematic review ; Taxa ; Terrestrial environments ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2020-05, Vol.11 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9948-3078 ; 0000-0002-3707-9301 ; 0000-0002-2850-4257 ; 0000-0003-4825-5435 ; 0000-0001-6956-8284 ; 0000-0002-4702-9017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407938703/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407938703?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11541,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,46027,46451,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischhoff, Ilya R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDeau, Shannon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostfeld, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosi, Emma J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><title>Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Pathogens and parasites (henceforth “pathogens”) can make up a large percentage of the biomass found in ecosystems, and therefore, their impacts on ecosystem processes should be prominent. Pathogens influence ecosystem processes by affecting the abundance or phenotype of hosts and through direct contributions to ecosystem production. However, there has been little quantitative synthesis of the relative effect sizes of these impacts on ecosystem processes. This study presents a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pathogen effects on primary production, secondary production, and biogeochemical cycles. We find that the effects of pathogens on ecosystem processes were greater where pathogens influenced host or community abundance or biomass than when they influenced phenotypes. Pathogen impacts on primary production were larger than on secondary production or biogeochemical cycles. By contrast, we detected no general differences in effect sizes across host or pathogen taxon or ecosystem type (terrestrial vs. aquatic). While we have found potential evidence of publication bias against negative results, a well‐known issue in meta‐analyses, our work nonetheless shows that the available literature under‐represents some taxa and geographic regions. To better understand the extent and magnitude of pathogen impacts on ecosystem processes, future research is needed in four areas. First, research is needed on the most understudied systems, including bacteria and viruses, as well as tropical ecosystems. A second priority is research seeking to understand how key components of ecosystem variation, including age (time of ecological continuity), productivity, and species diversity and composition, may interact to mediate pathogen impacts. Third, we suggest expanding on work examining how pathogen effects are influenced by climate change, species introductions, deforestation, and other human impacts. Fourth, we expect that host coinfection influences ecosystem processes in ways that cannot always be predicted based on studies of single infections. To enable others to build on this work, we make available the data we extracted from the literature, with the code for computing effect sizes.</description><subject>biogeochemical cycles</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>parasite</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>pathogen</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>secondary production</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OAjEUhRujiQRZ-AaTuHIxcNvOT8cdIahEEk3UddPp3MEhMIW2QHh7C2OMG7vpbfP1nNNDyC2FIQVgI9SODTmk-QXpMZpCLAqWXv6Zr8nAuSWElSa5SHiPvLwpq1zjMVJtFW2U_zILbCOsa9TeRSaM2rij87iONtZodA7dQzSOtjvV-sYr3-wxsrhv8HBDrmq1cjj42fvk83H6MXmO569Ps8l4HmteiDwWTChdQSJEyikrQ6xEi0xnUNVcZ3mGqEI0zHWRUJUC1nla1rSkoCmrmBK8T2adbmXUUm5ss1b2KI1q5PnC2IVU1jd6hTIYZlwAK4NDIgotADjW4VQVJSQlBq27Tit8brtD5-XS7Gwb4kuWQF5wkQMP1H1HaWucs1j_ulKQp-rlqXp5qj6wo449NCs8_g_K6eSdnV98A0Keg8Y</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Fischhoff, Ilya R.</creator><creator>Huang, Tao</creator><creator>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creator><creator>Han, Barbara A.</creator><creator>LaDeau, Shannon L.</creator><creator>Ostfeld, Richard S.</creator><creator>Rosi, Emma J.</creator><creator>Solomon, Christopher T.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-3078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-9301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-4257</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-5435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-8284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-9017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review</title><author>Fischhoff, Ilya R. ; Huang, Tao ; Hamilton, Stephen K. ; Han, Barbara A. ; LaDeau, Shannon L. ; Ostfeld, Richard S. ; Rosi, Emma J. ; Solomon, Christopher T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>biogeochemical cycles</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>parasite</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>pathogen</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>secondary production</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischhoff, Ilya R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Stephen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDeau, Shannon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostfeld, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosi, Emma J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischhoff, Ilya R.</au><au>Huang, Tao</au><au>Hamilton, Stephen K.</au><au>Han, Barbara A.</au><au>LaDeau, Shannon L.</au><au>Ostfeld, Richard S.</au><au>Rosi, Emma J.</au><au>Solomon, Christopher T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Pathogens and parasites (henceforth “pathogens”) can make up a large percentage of the biomass found in ecosystems, and therefore, their impacts on ecosystem processes should be prominent. Pathogens influence ecosystem processes by affecting the abundance or phenotype of hosts and through direct contributions to ecosystem production. However, there has been little quantitative synthesis of the relative effect sizes of these impacts on ecosystem processes. This study presents a systematic review and meta‐analysis of pathogen effects on primary production, secondary production, and biogeochemical cycles. We find that the effects of pathogens on ecosystem processes were greater where pathogens influenced host or community abundance or biomass than when they influenced phenotypes. Pathogen impacts on primary production were larger than on secondary production or biogeochemical cycles. By contrast, we detected no general differences in effect sizes across host or pathogen taxon or ecosystem type (terrestrial vs. aquatic). While we have found potential evidence of publication bias against negative results, a well‐known issue in meta‐analyses, our work nonetheless shows that the available literature under‐represents some taxa and geographic regions. To better understand the extent and magnitude of pathogen impacts on ecosystem processes, future research is needed in four areas. First, research is needed on the most understudied systems, including bacteria and viruses, as well as tropical ecosystems. A second priority is research seeking to understand how key components of ecosystem variation, including age (time of ecological continuity), productivity, and species diversity and composition, may interact to mediate pathogen impacts. Third, we suggest expanding on work examining how pathogen effects are influenced by climate change, species introductions, deforestation, and other human impacts. Fourth, we expect that host coinfection influences ecosystem processes in ways that cannot always be predicted based on studies of single infections. To enable others to build on this work, we make available the data we extracted from the literature, with the code for computing effect sizes.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ecs2.3057</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-3078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-9301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-4257</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-5435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-8284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-9017</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2150-8925 |
ispartof | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2020-05, Vol.11 (5), p.n/a |
issn | 2150-8925 2150-8925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39863802bc86489c8003efbc8d9b04be |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | biogeochemical cycles Biogeochemistry Biomass Carbon Climate change Deforestation Ecosystems Environmental changes Environmental impact Genotype & phenotype Introduced species Invertebrates Meta-analysis parasite Parasites pathogen Pathogens Primary production secondary production Species diversity Systematic review Taxa Terrestrial environments Viruses |
title | Parasite and pathogen effects on ecosystem processes: A quantitative review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parasite%20and%20pathogen%20effects%20on%20ecosystem%20processes:%20A%20quantitative%20review&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Fischhoff,%20Ilya%20R.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecs2.3057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2407938703%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-828acd04885312b9254c86c60df3c676eea843e7c941a50ef75bf1b10c12d2a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407938703&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |