Loading…

Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals

ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JBMR plus 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a
Main Authors: Cosman, Felicia, Libanati, Cesar, Deignan, Cynthia, Yu, Zhigang, Wang, Zhenxun, Ferrari, Serge, Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik, Peris, Pilar, Bertoldo, Francesco, Lespessailles, Eric, Hesse, Eric, Cummings, Steven R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page e10546
container_title JBMR plus
container_volume 5
creator Cosman, Felicia
Libanati, Cesar
Deignan, Cynthia
Yu, Zhigang
Wang, Zhenxun
Ferrari, Serge
Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik
Peris, Pilar
Bertoldo, Francesco
Lespessailles, Eric
Hesse, Eric
Cummings, Steven R
description ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was >50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score > −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm4.10546
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2592952290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSC7_AEheEFPD32hektNAS1AqEcrfszSRxtGsHezdVED8eb7cCyoHTjOxnHvm1pqpeEvyWYEzf7VzHSye4fFKdUl6zGcdMP_2rP6nOc95hjEmtmFDyeXXCeC0J4fq0-vktdjHHH0NnHbqKbRvvYIXcEc1D7xPkmPa9PwBaJrB9B6FHi9CUPkNG_RbQ1xSddb71_RHFNZo3Ww8HHzboIgZAtz5Asi36ACGPxB_LdbRtflE9W5cC5w_1rFpefVxefprdfLleXM5vZg3XRM7WVimQ1GJXWwzKEaeA10KuhbLCEW21Y1oprgVVTnHLdEHArThrGsCYnVWLSbuKdmf2yXc2HU203twfxLQxNvW-acGUUWDCCetqwkuruNSUKGYZtcVdF9f7ybUfXAerpmQpAR9JH98EvzWbeDBKyJorXgSvHwQpfh8g96bzuYG2tQHikA0VWnLBJB3RV_-guzikUH5qpGiJS_WY7s1ENSnmnGD9-zEEm3FFzLgi5n5FCkwm-M63cPwPaT5f3PJp5heZnr2t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592952290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of &gt; −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was &gt;50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score &gt; −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has &lt;50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34761149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alendronic acid ; ANABOLICS ; ANTIRESORPTIVES ; Bisphosphonates ; Bone density ; Bone mineral density ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; DXA ; Fractures ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Original ; OSTEOPOROSIS ; Patients ; Probability ; Spine (lumbar)</subject><ispartof>JBMR plus, 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1372-4417 ; 0000-0003-1427-7839 ; 0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2592952290/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2592952290?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libanati, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deignan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peris, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoldo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lespessailles, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><title>JBMR plus</title><description>ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of &gt; −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was &gt;50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score &gt; −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has &lt;50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><subject>Alendronic acid</subject><subject>ANABOLICS</subject><subject>ANTIRESORPTIVES</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>DXA</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>OSTEOPOROSIS</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><issn>2473-4039</issn><issn>2473-4039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSC7_AEheEFPD32hektNAS1AqEcrfszSRxtGsHezdVED8eb7cCyoHTjOxnHvm1pqpeEvyWYEzf7VzHSye4fFKdUl6zGcdMP_2rP6nOc95hjEmtmFDyeXXCeC0J4fq0-vktdjHHH0NnHbqKbRvvYIXcEc1D7xPkmPa9PwBaJrB9B6FHi9CUPkNG_RbQ1xSddb71_RHFNZo3Ww8HHzboIgZAtz5Asi36ACGPxB_LdbRtflE9W5cC5w_1rFpefVxefprdfLleXM5vZg3XRM7WVimQ1GJXWwzKEaeA10KuhbLCEW21Y1oprgVVTnHLdEHArThrGsCYnVWLSbuKdmf2yXc2HU203twfxLQxNvW-acGUUWDCCetqwkuruNSUKGYZtcVdF9f7ybUfXAerpmQpAR9JH98EvzWbeDBKyJorXgSvHwQpfh8g96bzuYG2tQHikA0VWnLBJB3RV_-guzikUH5qpGiJS_WY7s1ENSnmnGD9-zEEm3FFzLgi5n5FCkwm-M63cPwPaT5f3PJp5heZnr2t</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Cosman, Felicia</creator><creator>Libanati, Cesar</creator><creator>Deignan, Cynthia</creator><creator>Yu, Zhigang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenxun</creator><creator>Ferrari, Serge</creator><creator>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creator><creator>Peris, Pilar</creator><creator>Bertoldo, Francesco</creator><creator>Lespessailles, Eric</creator><creator>Hesse, Eric</creator><creator>Cummings, Steven R</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><author>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alendronic acid</topic><topic>ANABOLICS</topic><topic>ANTIRESORPTIVES</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>DXA</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>OSTEOPOROSIS</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libanati, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deignan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peris, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoldo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lespessailles, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Hospital Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JBMR plus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosman, Felicia</au><au>Libanati, Cesar</au><au>Deignan, Cynthia</au><au>Yu, Zhigang</au><au>Wang, Zhenxun</au><au>Ferrari, Serge</au><au>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</au><au>Peris, Pilar</au><au>Bertoldo, Francesco</au><au>Lespessailles, Eric</au><au>Hesse, Eric</au><au>Cummings, Steven R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</atitle><jtitle>JBMR plus</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e10546</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10546-n/a</pages><issn>2473-4039</issn><eissn>2473-4039</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of &gt; −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was &gt;50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score &gt; −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has &lt;50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34761149</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm4.10546</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2473-4039
ispartof JBMR plus, 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a
issn 2473-4039
2473-4039
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Alendronic acid
ANABOLICS
ANTIRESORPTIVES
Bisphosphonates
Bone density
Bone mineral density
CLINICAL TRIALS
DXA
Fractures
Monoclonal antibodies
Original
OSTEOPOROSIS
Patients
Probability
Spine (lumbar)
title Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T13%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Romosozumab%20Followed%20by%20Antiresorptive%20Treatment%20Increases%20the%20Probability%20of%20Achieving%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20Treatment%20Goals&rft.jtitle=JBMR%20plus&rft.au=Cosman,%20Felicia&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e10546&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10546-n/a&rft.issn=2473-4039&rft.eissn=2473-4039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm4.10546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2592952290%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592952290&rft_id=info:pmid/34761149&rfr_iscdi=true