Loading…
Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals
ABSTRACT Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine...
Saved in:
Published in: | JBMR plus 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e10546 |
container_title | JBMR plus |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Cosman, Felicia Libanati, Cesar Deignan, Cynthia Yu, Zhigang Wang, Zhenxun Ferrari, Serge Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik Peris, Pilar Bertoldo, Francesco Lespessailles, Eric Hesse, Eric Cummings, Steven R |
description | ABSTRACT
Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was >50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score > −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm4.10546 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2592952290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSC7_AEheEFPD32hektNAS1AqEcrfszSRxtGsHezdVED8eb7cCyoHTjOxnHvm1pqpeEvyWYEzf7VzHSye4fFKdUl6zGcdMP_2rP6nOc95hjEmtmFDyeXXCeC0J4fq0-vktdjHHH0NnHbqKbRvvYIXcEc1D7xPkmPa9PwBaJrB9B6FHi9CUPkNG_RbQ1xSddb71_RHFNZo3Ww8HHzboIgZAtz5Asi36ACGPxB_LdbRtflE9W5cC5w_1rFpefVxefprdfLleXM5vZg3XRM7WVimQ1GJXWwzKEaeA10KuhbLCEW21Y1oprgVVTnHLdEHArThrGsCYnVWLSbuKdmf2yXc2HU203twfxLQxNvW-acGUUWDCCetqwkuruNSUKGYZtcVdF9f7ybUfXAerpmQpAR9JH98EvzWbeDBKyJorXgSvHwQpfh8g96bzuYG2tQHikA0VWnLBJB3RV_-guzikUH5qpGiJS_WY7s1ENSnmnGD9-zEEm3FFzLgi5n5FCkwm-M63cPwPaT5f3PJp5heZnr2t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592952290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was >50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score > −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has <50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34761149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alendronic acid ; ANABOLICS ; ANTIRESORPTIVES ; Bisphosphonates ; Bone density ; Bone mineral density ; CLINICAL TRIALS ; DXA ; Fractures ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Original ; OSTEOPOROSIS ; Patients ; Probability ; Spine (lumbar)</subject><ispartof>JBMR plus, 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1372-4417 ; 0000-0003-1427-7839 ; 0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2592952290/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2592952290?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libanati, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deignan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peris, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoldo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lespessailles, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><title>JBMR plus</title><description>ABSTRACT
Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was >50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score > −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has <50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</description><subject>Alendronic acid</subject><subject>ANABOLICS</subject><subject>ANTIRESORPTIVES</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>CLINICAL TRIALS</subject><subject>DXA</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>OSTEOPOROSIS</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><issn>2473-4039</issn><issn>2473-4039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSC7_AEheEFPD32hektNAS1AqEcrfszSRxtGsHezdVED8eb7cCyoHTjOxnHvm1pqpeEvyWYEzf7VzHSye4fFKdUl6zGcdMP_2rP6nOc95hjEmtmFDyeXXCeC0J4fq0-vktdjHHH0NnHbqKbRvvYIXcEc1D7xPkmPa9PwBaJrB9B6FHi9CUPkNG_RbQ1xSddb71_RHFNZo3Ww8HHzboIgZAtz5Asi36ACGPxB_LdbRtflE9W5cC5w_1rFpefVxefprdfLleXM5vZg3XRM7WVimQ1GJXWwzKEaeA10KuhbLCEW21Y1oprgVVTnHLdEHArThrGsCYnVWLSbuKdmf2yXc2HU203twfxLQxNvW-acGUUWDCCetqwkuruNSUKGYZtcVdF9f7ybUfXAerpmQpAR9JH98EvzWbeDBKyJorXgSvHwQpfh8g96bzuYG2tQHikA0VWnLBJB3RV_-guzikUH5qpGiJS_WY7s1ENSnmnGD9-zEEm3FFzLgi5n5FCkwm-M63cPwPaT5f3PJp5heZnr2t</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Cosman, Felicia</creator><creator>Libanati, Cesar</creator><creator>Deignan, Cynthia</creator><creator>Yu, Zhigang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenxun</creator><creator>Ferrari, Serge</creator><creator>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creator><creator>Peris, Pilar</creator><creator>Bertoldo, Francesco</creator><creator>Lespessailles, Eric</creator><creator>Hesse, Eric</creator><creator>Cummings, Steven R</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</title><author>Cosman, Felicia ; Libanati, Cesar ; Deignan, Cynthia ; Yu, Zhigang ; Wang, Zhenxun ; Ferrari, Serge ; Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik ; Peris, Pilar ; Bertoldo, Francesco ; Lespessailles, Eric ; Hesse, Eric ; Cummings, Steven R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alendronic acid</topic><topic>ANABOLICS</topic><topic>ANTIRESORPTIVES</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>CLINICAL TRIALS</topic><topic>DXA</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>OSTEOPOROSIS</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libanati, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deignan, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peris, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertoldo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lespessailles, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesse, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Steven R</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Hospital Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JBMR plus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosman, Felicia</au><au>Libanati, Cesar</au><au>Deignan, Cynthia</au><au>Yu, Zhigang</au><au>Wang, Zhenxun</au><au>Ferrari, Serge</au><au>Beck Jensen, Jens‐Erik</au><au>Peris, Pilar</au><au>Bertoldo, Francesco</au><au>Lespessailles, Eric</au><au>Hesse, Eric</au><au>Cummings, Steven R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals</atitle><jtitle>JBMR plus</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e10546</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10546-n/a</pages><issn>2473-4039</issn><eissn>2473-4039</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Increases in bone mineral density (BMD) with osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced fracture risk. Increasing BMD is therefore a goal of osteoporosis therapy. Here, we compare the probability of achieving a T‐score of > −2.5 over 3 years at the total hip (TH) or lumbar spine (LS) in women with osteoporosis, ≥55 years of age, after the following treatment sequences: 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years denosumab (FRAME and FRAME extension trials), 1 year romosozumab followed by 2 years alendronate, or alendronate‐only for 3 years (ARCH trial). Probabilities of attaining the BMD target within 1 year of treatment were also determined. At both skeletal sites, in women with a baseline Tscore ≥ −2.7, there was >50% probability of achieving the BMD target with any 3‐year regimen. The probability of achieving the target BMD in those with a baseline TH Tscore equal to −3.0 was 61% with romosozumab/denosumab, 38% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 9% with alendronate. In those with a baseline LS Tscore equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving a T‐score > −2.5 was 93% with romosozumab/denosumab, 81% with romosozumab/alendronate, and 55% with alendronate. With 1 year of treatment, in patients with a baseline TH T‐score equal to −2.7, the probability of reaching the target Tscore with romosozumab was 71% to 78% and 38% with alendronate. For patients with an initial LS T‐score equal to −3.0, the probability of achieving the target T‐score over 1 year was 85% to 86% with romosozumab and 25% for alendronate. Our findings suggest baseline BMD and the probability of achieving BMD T‐score goals are factors to consider when selecting initial treatment for patients with osteoporosis. As baseline T‐score falls below −2.7 (TH) and −3.0 (LS), alendronate has <50% likelihood of achieving a BMD goal above osteoporosis range, whereas these probabilities remain relatively high for regimens beginning with romosozumab. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34761149</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm4.10546</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-7839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-6616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2473-4039 |
ispartof | JBMR plus, 2021-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e10546-n/a |
issn | 2473-4039 2473-4039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_39be35b5ab714be384692183a32a8b87 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Alendronic acid ANABOLICS ANTIRESORPTIVES Bisphosphonates Bone density Bone mineral density CLINICAL TRIALS DXA Fractures Monoclonal antibodies Original OSTEOPOROSIS Patients Probability Spine (lumbar) |
title | Romosozumab Followed by Antiresorptive Treatment Increases the Probability of Achieving Bone Mineral Density Treatment Goals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T13%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Romosozumab%20Followed%20by%20Antiresorptive%20Treatment%20Increases%20the%20Probability%20of%20Achieving%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20Treatment%20Goals&rft.jtitle=JBMR%20plus&rft.au=Cosman,%20Felicia&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e10546&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10546-n/a&rft.issn=2473-4039&rft.eissn=2473-4039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm4.10546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2592952290%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4916-fa88e62a0b7a0e8b1b8e4756f58a5b19a9b398849528b84a39b1bebd43cce003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592952290&rft_id=info:pmid/34761149&rfr_iscdi=true |