Loading…

Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients

Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digital health 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438
Main Authors: Hasegawa, Sho, Mizokami, Fumihiro, Kameya, Yoshitaka, Hayakawa, Yuji, Watanabe, Tsuyoshi, Matsui, Yasumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3
container_end_page 20552076231219438
container_issue
container_start_page 20552076231219438
container_title Digital health
container_volume 9
creator Hasegawa, Sho
Mizokami, Fumihiro
Kameya, Yoshitaka
Hayakawa, Yuji
Watanabe, Tsuyoshi
Matsui, Yasumoto
description Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution. Results The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS. Conclusions The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20552076231219438
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20552076231219438</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2903325265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDLLFhM8Wv-LGECmilIioB6-gmvhk8eOLBN0Gq-PN4OqUgECtbx9859vVpmqeCnwlh7UvJ21Zya6QSUnit3IPmeK-t9uLDP_ZHzSnRhnMurLJemMfNkXKCW-_kcfPjPQxf4oQsIZQpTmv2HQstxPo45W2ExFJeR5rjwAquCxLFPDGYIN1QJDbmwkZIiZVIX1kPhIHV84_X168ZDbnyLE4sp4CFQVjSzPIy72COOM30pHlUvYSnd-tJ8_ntm0_nF6urD-8uz19drQYt_bzSQyt8q60GMODCOOiRe24596aXTljnlOLGee6DG_s6deutAAijwBbVgOqkuTzkhgybblfiFspNlyF2t0Iu6w5KnTBhp0AI1Cpwrrw2QnujjJHW6DC2rre8Zr04ZO1K_rYgzd020oApwYR5oU56rpRspWkr-vwvdJOXUn9uT9V2nLFcVEocqKFkooLj_QMF7_ZFd_8UXT3P7pKXfovh3vGr1gqcHQCCNf6-9v-JPwEhxq4S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920586701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution. Results The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS. Conclusions The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20552076231219438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38107982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Body mass index ; Falls ; Health risks ; Machine learning ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076231219438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920586701?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21946,25732,27832,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,44924,45312</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38107982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><title>Digital health</title><addtitle>Digit Health</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution. Results The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS. Conclusions The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>2055-2076</issn><issn>2055-2076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDLLFhM8Wv-LGECmilIioB6-gmvhk8eOLBN0Gq-PN4OqUgECtbx9859vVpmqeCnwlh7UvJ21Zya6QSUnit3IPmeK-t9uLDP_ZHzSnRhnMurLJemMfNkXKCW-_kcfPjPQxf4oQsIZQpTmv2HQstxPo45W2ExFJeR5rjwAquCxLFPDGYIN1QJDbmwkZIiZVIX1kPhIHV84_X168ZDbnyLE4sp4CFQVjSzPIy72COOM30pHlUvYSnd-tJ8_ntm0_nF6urD-8uz19drQYt_bzSQyt8q60GMODCOOiRe24596aXTljnlOLGee6DG_s6deutAAijwBbVgOqkuTzkhgybblfiFspNlyF2t0Iu6w5KnTBhp0AI1Cpwrrw2QnujjJHW6DC2rre8Zr04ZO1K_rYgzd020oApwYR5oU56rpRspWkr-vwvdJOXUn9uT9V2nLFcVEocqKFkooLj_QMF7_ZFd_8UXT3P7pKXfovh3vGr1gqcHQCCNf6-9v-JPwEhxq4S</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Hasegawa, Sho</creator><creator>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creator><creator>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Hayakawa, Yuji</creator><creator>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creator><creator>Matsui, Yasumoto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><author>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasegawa, Sho</au><au>Mizokami, Fumihiro</au><au>Kameya, Yoshitaka</au><au>Hayakawa, Yuji</au><au>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</au><au>Matsui, Yasumoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</atitle><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle><addtitle>Digit Health</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>20552076231219438</spage><epage>20552076231219438</epage><pages>20552076231219438-20552076231219438</pages><issn>2055-2076</issn><eissn>2055-2076</eissn><abstract>Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution. Results The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS. Conclusions The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38107982</pmid><doi>10.1177/20552076231219438</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2055-2076
ispartof Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438
issn 2055-2076
2055-2076
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70
source Open Access: PubMed Central; SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
Body mass index
Falls
Health risks
Machine learning
Regression analysis
title Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20versus%20binomial%20logistic%20regression%20analysis%20for%20fall%20risk%20based%20on%20SPPB%20scores%20in%20older%20adult%20outpatients&rft.jtitle=Digital%20health&rft.au=Hasegawa,%20Sho&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=20552076231219438&rft.epage=20552076231219438&rft.pages=20552076231219438-20552076231219438&rft.issn=2055-2076&rft.eissn=2055-2076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20552076231219438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2903325265%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920586701&rft_id=info:pmid/38107982&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20552076231219438&rfr_iscdi=true