Loading…
Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients
Objective To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA). Methods We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Digital health 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3 |
container_end_page | 20552076231219438 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 20552076231219438 |
container_title | Digital health |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Hasegawa, Sho Mizokami, Fumihiro Kameya, Yoshitaka Hayakawa, Yuji Watanabe, Tsuyoshi Matsui, Yasumoto |
description | Objective
To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA).
Methods
We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution.
Results
The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS.
Conclusions
The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20552076231219438 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20552076231219438</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2903325265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDLLFhM8Wv-LGECmilIioB6-gmvhk8eOLBN0Gq-PN4OqUgECtbx9859vVpmqeCnwlh7UvJ21Zya6QSUnit3IPmeK-t9uLDP_ZHzSnRhnMurLJemMfNkXKCW-_kcfPjPQxf4oQsIZQpTmv2HQstxPo45W2ExFJeR5rjwAquCxLFPDGYIN1QJDbmwkZIiZVIX1kPhIHV84_X168ZDbnyLE4sp4CFQVjSzPIy72COOM30pHlUvYSnd-tJ8_ntm0_nF6urD-8uz19drQYt_bzSQyt8q60GMODCOOiRe24596aXTljnlOLGee6DG_s6deutAAijwBbVgOqkuTzkhgybblfiFspNlyF2t0Iu6w5KnTBhp0AI1Cpwrrw2QnujjJHW6DC2rre8Zr04ZO1K_rYgzd020oApwYR5oU56rpRspWkr-vwvdJOXUn9uT9V2nLFcVEocqKFkooLj_QMF7_ZFd_8UXT3P7pKXfovh3vGr1gqcHQCCNf6-9v-JPwEhxq4S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920586701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA).
Methods
We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution.
Results
The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS.
Conclusions
The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20552076231219438</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38107982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Body mass index ; Falls ; Health risks ; Machine learning ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076231219438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920586701?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21946,25732,27832,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,44924,45312</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38107982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><title>Digital health</title><addtitle>Digit Health</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA).
Methods
We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution.
Results
The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS.
Conclusions
The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>2055-2076</issn><issn>2055-2076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhSMEolXpD2CDLLFhM8Wv-LGECmilIioB6-gmvhk8eOLBN0Gq-PN4OqUgECtbx9859vVpmqeCnwlh7UvJ21Zya6QSUnit3IPmeK-t9uLDP_ZHzSnRhnMurLJemMfNkXKCW-_kcfPjPQxf4oQsIZQpTmv2HQstxPo45W2ExFJeR5rjwAquCxLFPDGYIN1QJDbmwkZIiZVIX1kPhIHV84_X168ZDbnyLE4sp4CFQVjSzPIy72COOM30pHlUvYSnd-tJ8_ntm0_nF6urD-8uz19drQYt_bzSQyt8q60GMODCOOiRe24596aXTljnlOLGee6DG_s6deutAAijwBbVgOqkuTzkhgybblfiFspNlyF2t0Iu6w5KnTBhp0AI1Cpwrrw2QnujjJHW6DC2rre8Zr04ZO1K_rYgzd020oApwYR5oU56rpRspWkr-vwvdJOXUn9uT9V2nLFcVEocqKFkooLj_QMF7_ZFd_8UXT3P7pKXfovh3vGr1gqcHQCCNf6-9v-JPwEhxq4S</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Hasegawa, Sho</creator><creator>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creator><creator>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Hayakawa, Yuji</creator><creator>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creator><creator>Matsui, Yasumoto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</title><author>Hasegawa, Sho ; Mizokami, Fumihiro ; Kameya, Yoshitaka ; Hayakawa, Yuji ; Watanabe, Tsuyoshi ; Matsui, Yasumoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Fumihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameya, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yasumoto</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasegawa, Sho</au><au>Mizokami, Fumihiro</au><au>Kameya, Yoshitaka</au><au>Hayakawa, Yuji</au><au>Watanabe, Tsuyoshi</au><au>Matsui, Yasumoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients</atitle><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle><addtitle>Digit Health</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>20552076231219438</spage><epage>20552076231219438</epage><pages>20552076231219438-20552076231219438</pages><issn>2055-2076</issn><eissn>2055-2076</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA).
Methods
We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left–right average), handgrip strength (left–right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution.
Results
The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0–81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS.
Conclusions
The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38107982</pmid><doi>10.1177/20552076231219438</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-1623</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2055-2076 |
ispartof | Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231219438-20552076231219438 |
issn | 2055-2076 2055-2076 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3a11e43d00394614963662764df58b70 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy Body mass index Falls Health risks Machine learning Regression analysis |
title | Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20versus%20binomial%20logistic%20regression%20analysis%20for%20fall%20risk%20based%20on%20SPPB%20scores%20in%20older%20adult%20outpatients&rft.jtitle=Digital%20health&rft.au=Hasegawa,%20Sho&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=20552076231219438&rft.epage=20552076231219438&rft.pages=20552076231219438-20552076231219438&rft.issn=2055-2076&rft.eissn=2055-2076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20552076231219438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2903325265%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-4c5195474aa6a8dfc4f09070096b28178833068909d8fb0555971aadf1e5e3ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920586701&rft_id=info:pmid/38107982&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20552076231219438&rfr_iscdi=true |