Loading…

Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study

Background: Researchers are increasingly using social media advertisements to recruit participants because of their many advantages over traditional methods. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of social media recruitment in the health sciences, no studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JMIR mental health 2020-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e18762-e18762
Main Authors: Lee, Sylvia, Torok, Michelle, Shand, Fiona, Chen, Nicola, McGillivray, Lauren, Burnett, Alexander, Larsen, Mark Erik, Mok, Katherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3
container_end_page e18762
container_issue 10
container_start_page e18762
container_title JMIR mental health
container_volume 7
creator Lee, Sylvia
Torok, Michelle
Shand, Fiona
Chen, Nicola
McGillivray, Lauren
Burnett, Alexander
Larsen, Mark Erik
Mok, Katherine
description Background: Researchers are increasingly using social media advertisements to recruit participants because of their many advantages over traditional methods. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of social media recruitment in the health sciences, no studies have yet examined this in the context of suicide prevention, which remains to be a highly stigmatized and sensitive topic. Objective: This study aims to recruit a general community sample to complete a survey on suicide literacy, stigma, and risk via Facebook advertisements. Specifically, we aim to establish the performance of the advertisements, cost-effectiveness, sample representativeness, and the impact of gender-specific advertising on recruiting men into the study. Methods: From June 2017 to March 2019, we released Facebook advertisements targeted at adults 18 years or older, residing in the New South Wales (NSW) trial or control regions, and involved in the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial. Cost-effectiveness was examined descriptively using metrics provided by Facebook. Chi-square analyses were conducted to determine demographic differences between our sample and the general NSW population as well as the impact of gender-specific advertisements on gender engagement. Results: The 14 Facebook advertisement campaigns reached a total of 675,199 people, yielding 25,993 link clicks and resulting in 9603 individuals initiating the survey (7487 completions) at an overall cost of Aus $2.81 (US $2.01) per participant. There was an overrepresentation of younger (P=.003), female (P=.003), highly educated (P
doi_str_mv 10.2196/18762
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3b32ac8f24884be3a18f6dad81f4dc51</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3b32ac8f24884be3a18f6dad81f4dc51</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2453685563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt9rFDEQgBdRbKn3PwRE8KGryebHZn0Q5Gi1UGix-hyyyaTNuZucSfbgnv3HTXtVrOQhw8zHx0wyTbMi-F1HBvGeyF50z5rjjgrZ9gMfnv8THzWrnDcYY8JlPeRlc0QpHjAh_Lj5dQ3JxTTrYOAUrWMu7ZlzYIrfQYCcT5EOFn2FbYIMoeg_eRQdOtcGxhh_1LJJiy9zBVCJ6GbxxltA1wkqXHwMlcigk7n7gK7C5ANUJu1gj27KYvevmhdOTxlWj_dJ8_387Nv6S3t59fli_emyNYyy0hLGiQBGiaVAuKF1cty7gfFRyN4MRmODu76GmDPNuOAWwzBgx2WPx544etJcHLw26o3aJj_rtFdRe_WQiOlW6VS8mUDRkXbaSNcxKdkIVBPphNVWEses4aS6Ph5c22WcwZo6Z9LTE-nTSvB36jbuVC8Yo_Je8PZRkOLPBXJRs88GpkkHiEtWHeP1AzkXtKKv_0M3cUmhPpXqOCFyID0VlXpzoEyKOSdwf5shWN1viXrYEvobVjStbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511891736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Lee, Sylvia ; Torok, Michelle ; Shand, Fiona ; Chen, Nicola ; McGillivray, Lauren ; Burnett, Alexander ; Larsen, Mark Erik ; Mok, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sylvia ; Torok, Michelle ; Shand, Fiona ; Chen, Nicola ; McGillivray, Lauren ; Burnett, Alexander ; Larsen, Mark Erik ; Mok, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Researchers are increasingly using social media advertisements to recruit participants because of their many advantages over traditional methods. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of social media recruitment in the health sciences, no studies have yet examined this in the context of suicide prevention, which remains to be a highly stigmatized and sensitive topic. Objective: This study aims to recruit a general community sample to complete a survey on suicide literacy, stigma, and risk via Facebook advertisements. Specifically, we aim to establish the performance of the advertisements, cost-effectiveness, sample representativeness, and the impact of gender-specific advertising on recruiting men into the study. Methods: From June 2017 to March 2019, we released Facebook advertisements targeted at adults 18 years or older, residing in the New South Wales (NSW) trial or control regions, and involved in the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial. Cost-effectiveness was examined descriptively using metrics provided by Facebook. Chi-square analyses were conducted to determine demographic differences between our sample and the general NSW population as well as the impact of gender-specific advertisements on gender engagement. Results: The 14 Facebook advertisement campaigns reached a total of 675,199 people, yielding 25,993 link clicks and resulting in 9603 individuals initiating the survey (7487 completions) at an overall cost of Aus $2.81 (US $2.01) per participant. There was an overrepresentation of younger (P=.003), female (P=.003), highly educated (P&lt;.001) participants and mental health conditions (P&lt;.001) compared with the total NSW population. The use of male-specific advertisements resulted in a significantly higher proportion of men completing the survey relative to gender-neutral advertisements (38.2% vs 24.6%; P&lt;.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of Facebook to be an effective, low-cost strategy for recruiting a large sample of general community participants for suicide prevention research. Strategies to improve sample representativeness warrant further investigation in future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2368-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2368-7959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/18762</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33090115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Community ; Confidentiality ; Cost analysis ; Drug use ; Gender ; Internet access ; Literacy ; Medical research ; Mental health ; Original Paper ; Participation ; Prevention ; Questionnaires ; Social networks ; Stigma ; Suicide prevention ; Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>JMIR mental health, 2020-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e18762-e18762</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Sylvia Lee, Michelle Torok, Fiona Shand, Nicola Chen, Lauren McGillivray, Alexander Burnett, Mark Erik Larsen, Katherine Mok. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 22.10.2020. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0272-2053 ; 0000-0001-9022-0274 ; 0000-0001-6765-228X ; 0000-0002-8313-7883 ; 0000-0001-7248-2692 ; 0000-0003-3741-8075 ; 0000-0001-6648-6646 ; 0000-0002-7695-6469</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2511891736/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2511891736?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torok, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGillivray, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Mark Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study</title><title>JMIR mental health</title><description>Background: Researchers are increasingly using social media advertisements to recruit participants because of their many advantages over traditional methods. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of social media recruitment in the health sciences, no studies have yet examined this in the context of suicide prevention, which remains to be a highly stigmatized and sensitive topic. Objective: This study aims to recruit a general community sample to complete a survey on suicide literacy, stigma, and risk via Facebook advertisements. Specifically, we aim to establish the performance of the advertisements, cost-effectiveness, sample representativeness, and the impact of gender-specific advertising on recruiting men into the study. Methods: From June 2017 to March 2019, we released Facebook advertisements targeted at adults 18 years or older, residing in the New South Wales (NSW) trial or control regions, and involved in the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial. Cost-effectiveness was examined descriptively using metrics provided by Facebook. Chi-square analyses were conducted to determine demographic differences between our sample and the general NSW population as well as the impact of gender-specific advertisements on gender engagement. Results: The 14 Facebook advertisement campaigns reached a total of 675,199 people, yielding 25,993 link clicks and resulting in 9603 individuals initiating the survey (7487 completions) at an overall cost of Aus $2.81 (US $2.01) per participant. There was an overrepresentation of younger (P=.003), female (P=.003), highly educated (P&lt;.001) participants and mental health conditions (P&lt;.001) compared with the total NSW population. The use of male-specific advertisements resulted in a significantly higher proportion of men completing the survey relative to gender-neutral advertisements (38.2% vs 24.6%; P&lt;.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of Facebook to be an effective, low-cost strategy for recruiting a large sample of general community participants for suicide prevention research. Strategies to improve sample representativeness warrant further investigation in future research.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Suicide prevention</subject><subject>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><issn>2368-7959</issn><issn>2368-7959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt9rFDEQgBdRbKn3PwRE8KGryebHZn0Q5Gi1UGix-hyyyaTNuZucSfbgnv3HTXtVrOQhw8zHx0wyTbMi-F1HBvGeyF50z5rjjgrZ9gMfnv8THzWrnDcYY8JlPeRlc0QpHjAh_Lj5dQ3JxTTrYOAUrWMu7ZlzYIrfQYCcT5EOFn2FbYIMoeg_eRQdOtcGxhh_1LJJiy9zBVCJ6GbxxltA1wkqXHwMlcigk7n7gK7C5ANUJu1gj27KYvevmhdOTxlWj_dJ8_387Nv6S3t59fli_emyNYyy0hLGiQBGiaVAuKF1cty7gfFRyN4MRmODu76GmDPNuOAWwzBgx2WPx544etJcHLw26o3aJj_rtFdRe_WQiOlW6VS8mUDRkXbaSNcxKdkIVBPphNVWEses4aS6Ph5c22WcwZo6Z9LTE-nTSvB36jbuVC8Yo_Je8PZRkOLPBXJRs88GpkkHiEtWHeP1AzkXtKKv_0M3cUmhPpXqOCFyID0VlXpzoEyKOSdwf5shWN1viXrYEvobVjStbw</recordid><startdate>20201022</startdate><enddate>20201022</enddate><creator>Lee, Sylvia</creator><creator>Torok, Michelle</creator><creator>Shand, Fiona</creator><creator>Chen, Nicola</creator><creator>McGillivray, Lauren</creator><creator>Burnett, Alexander</creator><creator>Larsen, Mark Erik</creator><creator>Mok, Katherine</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-228X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-7883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-8075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-6646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-6469</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201022</creationdate><title>Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study</title><author>Lee, Sylvia ; Torok, Michelle ; Shand, Fiona ; Chen, Nicola ; McGillivray, Lauren ; Burnett, Alexander ; Larsen, Mark Erik ; Mok, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Suicide prevention</topic><topic>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torok, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGillivray, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Mark Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>JMIR mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sylvia</au><au>Torok, Michelle</au><au>Shand, Fiona</au><au>Chen, Nicola</au><au>McGillivray, Lauren</au><au>Burnett, Alexander</au><au>Larsen, Mark Erik</au><au>Mok, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study</atitle><jtitle>JMIR mental health</jtitle><date>2020-10-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e18762</spage><epage>e18762</epage><pages>e18762-e18762</pages><issn>2368-7959</issn><eissn>2368-7959</eissn><abstract>Background: Researchers are increasingly using social media advertisements to recruit participants because of their many advantages over traditional methods. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of social media recruitment in the health sciences, no studies have yet examined this in the context of suicide prevention, which remains to be a highly stigmatized and sensitive topic. Objective: This study aims to recruit a general community sample to complete a survey on suicide literacy, stigma, and risk via Facebook advertisements. Specifically, we aim to establish the performance of the advertisements, cost-effectiveness, sample representativeness, and the impact of gender-specific advertising on recruiting men into the study. Methods: From June 2017 to March 2019, we released Facebook advertisements targeted at adults 18 years or older, residing in the New South Wales (NSW) trial or control regions, and involved in the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial. Cost-effectiveness was examined descriptively using metrics provided by Facebook. Chi-square analyses were conducted to determine demographic differences between our sample and the general NSW population as well as the impact of gender-specific advertisements on gender engagement. Results: The 14 Facebook advertisement campaigns reached a total of 675,199 people, yielding 25,993 link clicks and resulting in 9603 individuals initiating the survey (7487 completions) at an overall cost of Aus $2.81 (US $2.01) per participant. There was an overrepresentation of younger (P=.003), female (P=.003), highly educated (P&lt;.001) participants and mental health conditions (P&lt;.001) compared with the total NSW population. The use of male-specific advertisements resulted in a significantly higher proportion of men completing the survey relative to gender-neutral advertisements (38.2% vs 24.6%; P&lt;.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of Facebook to be an effective, low-cost strategy for recruiting a large sample of general community participants for suicide prevention research. Strategies to improve sample representativeness warrant further investigation in future research.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>33090115</pmid><doi>10.2196/18762</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-2053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6765-228X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-7883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-2692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-8075</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-6646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-6469</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2368-7959
ispartof JMIR mental health, 2020-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e18762-e18762
issn 2368-7959
2368-7959
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3b32ac8f24884be3a18f6dad81f4dc51
source PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Advertising
Community
Confidentiality
Cost analysis
Drug use
Gender
Internet access
Literacy
Medical research
Mental health
Original Paper
Participation
Prevention
Questionnaires
Social networks
Stigma
Suicide prevention
Suicides & suicide attempts
title Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Representativeness of Facebook Recruitment to Suicide Prevention Research: Online Survey Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance,%20Cost-Effectiveness,%20and%20Representativeness%20of%20Facebook%20Recruitment%20to%20Suicide%20Prevention%20Research:%20Online%20Survey%20Study&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20mental%20health&rft.au=Lee,%20Sylvia&rft.date=2020-10-22&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e18762&rft.epage=e18762&rft.pages=e18762-e18762&rft.issn=2368-7959&rft.eissn=2368-7959&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/18762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2453685563%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-14516e431d3e15c321907f945b687c9ca0c02787c054a4565d0e990f5870b71f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511891736&rft_id=info:pmid/33090115&rfr_iscdi=true