The limits of personal experience

This article examines how three types of experience-personal, related others, and unrelated others-influence decision-making. We present the complexities and nuances in using these experiential sources to suggest that personal experience is preferred to the other two sources. We discuss the implicat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2024-10, Vol.15, p.1365180
Main Author: Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
decision-making
experience
information
personal experience
Psychology
rationality
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-849923e7ce8ba190942a0e8cfce1e21b71a1cc3ca16ebdc908b2bed4027524b63
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1365180
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 15
creator Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
description This article examines how three types of experience-personal, related others, and unrelated others-influence decision-making. We present the complexities and nuances in using these experiential sources to suggest that personal experience is preferred to the other two sources. We discuss the implications of this preference for decision-making processes, especially in contexts involving transformative outcomes. To conclude, we discuss how people rely on other experiential sources when their preferred source is limited.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365180
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3b7093eaf38e4a18866f42583b78825b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3b7093eaf38e4a18866f42583b78825b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3128325368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-849923e7ce8ba190942a0e8cfce1e21b71a1cc3ca16ebdc908b2bed4027524b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1PAjEQhhujEYL8AQ8Gb14WO2232z0ZY_wgIfGC56Yts7Bk2WK7GPn3Lh8S6KWT6czTN3kIuQU65Fzlj8UqbmZDRpkYApcpKHpBuiClSIBm6vKk7pB-jAvaHkEZpeyadHieAkul6JL7yRwHVbksmzjwxWCFIfraVAP8bcsSa4c35KowVcT-4e6Rr7fXyctHMv58H708jxPHqWwSJfKcccwcKmsgp7lghqJyhUNABjYDA85xZ0CinbqcKsssTttIWcqElbxHRnvu1JuFXoVyacJGe1PqXcOHmTahKV2FmtuM5hxNwRUKA0pJWQiWqravFEtty3ras1Zru8Spw7oJpjqDnr_U5VzP_I8GSAUA3aZ5OBCC_15jbPSyjA6rytTo11FzYIqzlEvVjrL9qAs-xoDF8R-geutK71zprSt9cNUu3Z0mPK78m-F_MoCPgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128325368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The limits of personal experience</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines how three types of experience-personal, related others, and unrelated others-influence decision-making. We present the complexities and nuances in using these experiential sources to suggest that personal experience is preferred to the other two sources. We discuss the implications of this preference for decision-making processes, especially in contexts involving transformative outcomes. To conclude, we discuss how people rely on other experiential sources when their preferred source is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365180</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39512564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>decision-making ; experience ; information ; personal experience ; Psychology ; rationality</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2024-10, Vol.15, p.1365180</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Ganuthula.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Ganuthula. 2024 Ganuthula</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-849923e7ce8ba190942a0e8cfce1e21b71a1cc3ca16ebdc908b2bed4027524b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541106/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541106/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39512564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</creatorcontrib><title>The limits of personal experience</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>This article examines how three types of experience-personal, related others, and unrelated others-influence decision-making. We present the complexities and nuances in using these experiential sources to suggest that personal experience is preferred to the other two sources. We discuss the implications of this preference for decision-making processes, especially in contexts involving transformative outcomes. To conclude, we discuss how people rely on other experiential sources when their preferred source is limited.</description><subject>decision-making</subject><subject>experience</subject><subject>information</subject><subject>personal experience</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>rationality</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1PAjEQhhujEYL8AQ8Gb14WO2232z0ZY_wgIfGC56Yts7Bk2WK7GPn3Lh8S6KWT6czTN3kIuQU65Fzlj8UqbmZDRpkYApcpKHpBuiClSIBm6vKk7pB-jAvaHkEZpeyadHieAkul6JL7yRwHVbksmzjwxWCFIfraVAP8bcsSa4c35KowVcT-4e6Rr7fXyctHMv58H708jxPHqWwSJfKcccwcKmsgp7lghqJyhUNABjYDA85xZ0CinbqcKsssTttIWcqElbxHRnvu1JuFXoVyacJGe1PqXcOHmTahKV2FmtuM5hxNwRUKA0pJWQiWqravFEtty3ras1Zru8Spw7oJpjqDnr_U5VzP_I8GSAUA3aZ5OBCC_15jbPSyjA6rytTo11FzYIqzlEvVjrL9qAs-xoDF8R-geutK71zprSt9cNUu3Z0mPK78m-F_MoCPgg</recordid><startdate>20241021</startdate><enddate>20241021</enddate><creator>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241021</creationdate><title>The limits of personal experience</title><author>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-849923e7ce8ba190942a0e8cfce1e21b71a1cc3ca16ebdc908b2bed4027524b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>experience</topic><topic>information</topic><topic>personal experience</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>rationality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The limits of personal experience</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-10-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><spage>1365180</spage><pages>1365180-</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>This article examines how three types of experience-personal, related others, and unrelated others-influence decision-making. We present the complexities and nuances in using these experiential sources to suggest that personal experience is preferred to the other two sources. We discuss the implications of this preference for decision-making processes, especially in contexts involving transformative outcomes. To conclude, we discuss how people rely on other experiential sources when their preferred source is limited.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>39512564</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365180</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2024-10, Vol.15, p.1365180
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3b7093eaf38e4a18866f42583b78825b
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects decision-making
experience
information
personal experience
Psychology
rationality
title The limits of personal experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A31%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20limits%20of%20personal%20experience&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Ganuthula,%20Venkat%20Ram%20Reddy&rft.date=2024-10-21&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=1365180&rft.pages=1365180-&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365180&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3128325368%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-849923e7ce8ba190942a0e8cfce1e21b71a1cc3ca16ebdc908b2bed4027524b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128325368&rft_id=info:pmid/39512564&rfr_iscdi=true