Performance Analysis of Internal Ballistic Multiphase Flow of Composite Charge Structure

• Published in: Energies (Basel) 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2127
• Main Authors: Cheng, Shenshen, Jiang, Kun, Xue, Shao, Tao, Ruyi, Lu, Xinggan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Antiballistic materials; Ballistic impact tests; Ballistics; charge structure; Combustion; Combustion chambers; Feasibility studies; Gases; Ignition; Impact analysis; interior ballistic; Interior ballistics; Mathematical models; Mathematical optimization; Methods; Multiphase flow; Numerical analysis; numerical simulation; Optimization; Parameter sensitivity; Partial differential equations; Two dimensional flow; Two phase flow; Velocity
• ISSN: 1996-1073; 1996-1073
• DOI: 10.3390/en16052127

Different charge structures have different interior ballistic performance. Existing research is based on experimental measurements or the lumped parameter method to obtain limited ballistic characteristics, which indirectly impacts the analysis of the parameters’ distribution, requiring a complex modeling solution process. Besides this, the ignition performance of different charge structures needs to be further explored. The disadvantages of previous studies have limited the feasibility of further optimization of the composite charge structure. In this paper, we apply a two-dimensional two-phase flow method based on the Eulerian–Lagrangian model to study the performance of different composite charge structures. First, we establish the mathematical model of different particle types based on interior ballistics, which is directly related to the research foundation of subsequent ballistic performance. Next, we investigate the multi-scale reaction flow of complex charge structures by the two-phase flow method and obtain the distribution of parameters in the chamber. Finally, we conduct a study with different particle charge parameters to explore the sensitivity of ballistic characteristics to structural parameters. The results show that the tubular propellant has good ignition performance in different charge structures, and the ignition consistency can be improved by charging tubular propellant in the center of the chamber. However, more tubular propellants are ineffective at significantly improving ignition performance, and result in a decrease in combustion chamber pressure. These results may be promising for the optimization of various charge structures.