Dicamba off‐target movement from applications on soybeans at two growth stages

• Published in: Agrosystems, geosciences & environment geosciences & environment, 2023-06, Vol.6 (2), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Kruger, Greg R., Alves, Guilherme S., Schroeder, Kasey, Golus, Jeffrey A., Reynolds, Daniel B., Dodds, Darrin M., Brown, Ashli E., Fritz, Bradley K., Hoffmann, Wesley C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Air sampling; Atmospheric conditions; Buffer zones; Climate; Crops; Drift; Environmental conditions; Fluctuations; Glyphosate; Growth stage; Herbicides; Humidity; Mathematical analysis; Pesticides; Potassium; Potassium salts; Samplers; Seeds; Soybeans; Wind
• ISSN: 2639-6696; 2639-6696
• DOI: 10.1002/agg2.20363

The objective of this study was to evaluate dicamba off‐target movement during and after applications over soybean at two growth stages. Dicamba‐tolerant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] at V3 and R1 growth stages in Nebraska and Mississippi fields were treated with diglycolamine salt of dicamba (560 g ae ha−1), potassium salt of glyphosate (1260 g ae ha−1), and a drift‐reducing adjuvant (0.5% v v−1). Filter papers positioned outside the sprayed area were used to determine primary movement and air samplers positioned at the center of sprayed area were used to calculate dicamba flux from 0.5 up to 68 hours after application (HAA). Flux was calculated using the aerodynamic method. Soybean growth stage did not affect dicamba deposition on filter papers from 8 to 45 m downwind from the sprayed areas. At 33 m downwind (i.e., distance of the labeled buffer zone), a spray drift of less than 0.0091% (0.05 g ae ha−1) of applied rate is estimated. Dicamba secondary movement may not be affected by soybean growth stage during the application. Although dicamba was detected in air samples collected at 68 HAA, the majority of the secondary movement was observed in the first 24 HAA. Dicamba cumulative loss was lower than 0.77% of applied rate. Results suggest the more stable the atmospheric conditions, the higher the dicamba flux. Thus, meteorological conditions after applications must be considered, and tools to predict the occurrence of temperature inversion are needed to minimize secondary movement of dicamba. Core Ideas Soybean growth stage had minor influence on off‐target movement of dicamba. The highest dicamba flux was observed in the first 30 h after application. Dicamba cumulative loss was lower than 0.77% of applied rate.