Loading…
Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis
Purpose: Main objective of the paper is to assess whether the auctions issuers have changed their preferences regarding the auction transparency described through the visibility settings, and to asses which and to what extent had the other auction parameters impact on the auction transparency and al...
Saved in:
Published in: | Kvalita inovácia prosperita 2018-01, Vol.22 (2), p.100-111 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-7d199ab7a0a39f2172e9e6bf1fd4953bf5430ee6873de6dbdbbfb3a99fff80663 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 111 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Kvalita inovácia prosperita |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Dráb, Radovan Delina, Radoslav Štofa, Tomáš |
description | Purpose: Main objective of the paper is to assess whether the auctions issuers have changed their preferences regarding the auction transparency described through the visibility settings, and to asses which and to what extent had the other auction parameters impact on the auction transparency and also to assess the effect of the transparency onto the achieved auction savings.Methodology/Approach: The paper analyses sample records of 5,000 electronic auctions of SR and CR auction issuers on the time frame of 2009-2016, using methods of higher statistics. An composite index for transparency analysis has been developed and assessed. Two standalone regression models were applied to analyse the papers hypotheses regarding the transparency and auctions’ savings.Findings: The size of the auction described does not have a significant effect on the transparency settings, but the auction complexity does. The most saving generating visibility settings is the visible order of the participants and the visibility of the other measurements settings for the auctions. Increasing the auction complexity can decrease the generated saving by an average 9.3%.Research Limitation/implication: Research was based on real secondary data from one electronic auction provider. The results are limited to the features enabled on this electronic platform. Results show that the application of visibility setting in auctions can generate additional benefits like savings, but also has to be applied carefully when assessing the transparency.Originality/Value of paper: The analysis and results based on real secondary data are scare in the current research area, therefore is this article a valued contribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3becdc90474f4807b5544754e99c41b8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3becdc90474f4807b5544754e99c41b8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2705046059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-7d199ab7a0a39f2172e9e6bf1fd4953bf5430ee6873de6dbdbbfb3a99fff80663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhhdRsNSevQY8b5tsvjbeSqlaEAStXkOSTUrKutkmqbD_3rUV8TTD8PLMzFMUtwjOUcU5Wxx8P_-qKl_NEaTiopggjGmJOKGX__rrYpaS17BigiPG-aTYrFtrcgydN2B5NNmHLt2D19BaEBz48GPatz4P4M3m7LtdAr4D26i61KtoOzOAZafaIfl0U1w51SY7-63T4v1hvV09lc8vj5vV8rk04xW55A0SQmmuoMLCVYhXVlimHXINERRrRwmG1rKa48ayRjdaO42VEM65GjKGp8XmzG2C2ss--k8VBxmUl6dBiDupYvamtRJraxojIOHEkRpyTSkhnBIrhCFI1yPr7szqYzgcbcpyH45xfCjJikMKCRtljqnFOWViSCla97cVQXnSL0f98qRf_ujH34DkeVo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2705046059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Dráb, Radovan ; Delina, Radoslav ; Štofa, Tomáš</creator><creatorcontrib>Dráb, Radovan ; Delina, Radoslav ; Štofa, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Main objective of the paper is to assess whether the auctions issuers have changed their preferences regarding the auction transparency described through the visibility settings, and to asses which and to what extent had the other auction parameters impact on the auction transparency and also to assess the effect of the transparency onto the achieved auction savings.Methodology/Approach: The paper analyses sample records of 5,000 electronic auctions of SR and CR auction issuers on the time frame of 2009-2016, using methods of higher statistics. An composite index for transparency analysis has been developed and assessed. Two standalone regression models were applied to analyse the papers hypotheses regarding the transparency and auctions’ savings.Findings: The size of the auction described does not have a significant effect on the transparency settings, but the auction complexity does. The most saving generating visibility settings is the visible order of the participants and the visibility of the other measurements settings for the auctions. Increasing the auction complexity can decrease the generated saving by an average 9.3%.Research Limitation/implication: Research was based on real secondary data from one electronic auction provider. The results are limited to the features enabled on this electronic platform. Results show that the application of visibility setting in auctions can generate additional benefits like savings, but also has to be applied carefully when assessing the transparency.Originality/Value of paper: The analysis and results based on real secondary data are scare in the current research area, therefore is this article a valued contribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1335-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1335-1745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Trencin: Technical University of Kosice</publisher><subject>auction benefits ; Auctions ; Electronic commerce ; electronic reverse auctions ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Kvalita inovácia prosperita, 2018-01, Vol.22 (2), p.100-111</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-7d199ab7a0a39f2172e9e6bf1fd4953bf5430ee6873de6dbdbbfb3a99fff80663</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0412-9840 ; 0000-0002-6022-5995 ; 0000-0002-9824-3531</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2705046059?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11686,25751,27922,27923,36058,37010,44361,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dráb, Radovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delina, Radoslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Štofa, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis</title><title>Kvalita inovácia prosperita</title><description>Purpose: Main objective of the paper is to assess whether the auctions issuers have changed their preferences regarding the auction transparency described through the visibility settings, and to asses which and to what extent had the other auction parameters impact on the auction transparency and also to assess the effect of the transparency onto the achieved auction savings.Methodology/Approach: The paper analyses sample records of 5,000 electronic auctions of SR and CR auction issuers on the time frame of 2009-2016, using methods of higher statistics. An composite index for transparency analysis has been developed and assessed. Two standalone regression models were applied to analyse the papers hypotheses regarding the transparency and auctions’ savings.Findings: The size of the auction described does not have a significant effect on the transparency settings, but the auction complexity does. The most saving generating visibility settings is the visible order of the participants and the visibility of the other measurements settings for the auctions. Increasing the auction complexity can decrease the generated saving by an average 9.3%.Research Limitation/implication: Research was based on real secondary data from one electronic auction provider. The results are limited to the features enabled on this electronic platform. Results show that the application of visibility setting in auctions can generate additional benefits like savings, but also has to be applied carefully when assessing the transparency.Originality/Value of paper: The analysis and results based on real secondary data are scare in the current research area, therefore is this article a valued contribution.</description><subject>auction benefits</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>electronic reverse auctions</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1335-1745</issn><issn>1335-1745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhhdRsNSevQY8b5tsvjbeSqlaEAStXkOSTUrKutkmqbD_3rUV8TTD8PLMzFMUtwjOUcU5Wxx8P_-qKl_NEaTiopggjGmJOKGX__rrYpaS17BigiPG-aTYrFtrcgydN2B5NNmHLt2D19BaEBz48GPatz4P4M3m7LtdAr4D26i61KtoOzOAZafaIfl0U1w51SY7-63T4v1hvV09lc8vj5vV8rk04xW55A0SQmmuoMLCVYhXVlimHXINERRrRwmG1rKa48ayRjdaO42VEM65GjKGp8XmzG2C2ss--k8VBxmUl6dBiDupYvamtRJraxojIOHEkRpyTSkhnBIrhCFI1yPr7szqYzgcbcpyH45xfCjJikMKCRtljqnFOWViSCla97cVQXnSL0f98qRf_ujH34DkeVo</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Dráb, Radovan</creator><creator>Delina, Radoslav</creator><creator>Štofa, Tomáš</creator><general>Technical University of Kosice</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0412-9840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-3531</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis</title><author>Dráb, Radovan ; Delina, Radoslav ; Štofa, Tomáš</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-7d199ab7a0a39f2172e9e6bf1fd4953bf5430ee6873de6dbdbbfb3a99fff80663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>auction benefits</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>electronic reverse auctions</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dráb, Radovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delina, Radoslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Štofa, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Kvalita inovácia prosperita</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dráb, Radovan</au><au>Delina, Radoslav</au><au>Štofa, Tomáš</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Kvalita inovácia prosperita</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>100-111</pages><issn>1335-1745</issn><eissn>1335-1745</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Main objective of the paper is to assess whether the auctions issuers have changed their preferences regarding the auction transparency described through the visibility settings, and to asses which and to what extent had the other auction parameters impact on the auction transparency and also to assess the effect of the transparency onto the achieved auction savings.Methodology/Approach: The paper analyses sample records of 5,000 electronic auctions of SR and CR auction issuers on the time frame of 2009-2016, using methods of higher statistics. An composite index for transparency analysis has been developed and assessed. Two standalone regression models were applied to analyse the papers hypotheses regarding the transparency and auctions’ savings.Findings: The size of the auction described does not have a significant effect on the transparency settings, but the auction complexity does. The most saving generating visibility settings is the visible order of the participants and the visibility of the other measurements settings for the auctions. Increasing the auction complexity can decrease the generated saving by an average 9.3%.Research Limitation/implication: Research was based on real secondary data from one electronic auction provider. The results are limited to the features enabled on this electronic platform. Results show that the application of visibility setting in auctions can generate additional benefits like savings, but also has to be applied carefully when assessing the transparency.Originality/Value of paper: The analysis and results based on real secondary data are scare in the current research area, therefore is this article a valued contribution.</abstract><cop>Trencin</cop><pub>Technical University of Kosice</pub><doi>10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0412-9840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-3531</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1335-1745 |
ispartof | Kvalita inovácia prosperita, 2018-01, Vol.22 (2), p.100-111 |
issn | 1335-1745 1335-1745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3becdc90474f4807b5544754e99c41b8 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Business Source Ultimate |
subjects | auction benefits Auctions Electronic commerce electronic reverse auctions Transparency |
title | Electronic Auctions: Role of Visibility Settings in Transparency Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A15%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Auctions:%20Role%20of%20Visibility%20Settings%20in%20Transparency%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Kvalita%20inov%C3%A1cia%20prosperita&rft.au=Dr%C3%A1b,%20Radovan&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=100-111&rft.issn=1335-1745&rft.eissn=1335-1745&rft_id=info:doi/10.12776/qip.v22i2.1059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2705046059%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-7d199ab7a0a39f2172e9e6bf1fd4953bf5430ee6873de6dbdbbfb3a99fff80663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2705046059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |