Loading…

Individualized anemia management enhanced by ferric pyrophosphate citrate protocol

The optimal use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and parenteral iron in managing anemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains controversial. One-size-fits-all rule-based algorithms dominate dosing protocols for ESA and parenteral iron. However, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-11, Vol.12 (1), p.20122-20122, Article 20122
Main Authors: Chait, Yossi, Nathanson, Brian H., Germain, Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The optimal use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and parenteral iron in managing anemia in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains controversial. One-size-fits-all rule-based algorithms dominate dosing protocols for ESA and parenteral iron. However, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for using ESAs in chronic kidney disease recommend individualized therapy for the patient. This prospective quality assurance project was at a single hemodialysis (HD) center comprising three 6-month phases (A, B, C) separated by 3-month washout periods. Standard bi-weekly ESA dose titration and intravenous (IV) iron sucrose protocols were used in baseline Phase A, and ferric pyrophosphate citrate (FPC) augmented iron in Phase B. In Phase C, an FPC protocol and weekly, individualized ESA management were used. We examined clinic-level mean differences in hemoglobin (Hb) and ESRD-related outcomes by phase with repeated ANOVA. To examine the Hb at the patient level, we used multi-level mixed-effect regression adjusting for phase, month, and other relevant confounders at each month over time to derive the mean marginal effects of phase. There were 54, 78, and 66 patients in phases A, B, and C, respectively, with raw mean Hb values of 9.9, 10.2, and 10.3 g/dL. The percentage of Hb values 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-23262-1