Loading…

Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases

To verify the predictors of intravasation rate during hysteroscopy. Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II(-1)). All cases (n=200 women; 22 to 86 years old) were treated in an operating room setting. Considering respective bag overfill to calculate water balance, we t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia 2015-01, Vol.37 (1), p.24-29
Main Authors: Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas, Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura, Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida, Sessa, Felipe Ventura, Crispi, Claudio Peixoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d664044352247db3293d8e994cab7bf0887ea47aec00d9e531876b7f857c50193
cites
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia
container_volume 37
creator Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas
Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura
Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida
Sessa, Felipe Ventura
Crispi, Claudio Peixoto
description To verify the predictors of intravasation rate during hysteroscopy. Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II(-1)). All cases (n=200 women; 22 to 86 years old) were treated in an operating room setting. Considering respective bag overfill to calculate water balance, we tested two multiple linear regression models: one for total intravasation (mL) and the other for absorption rate (mL.min(-1)). The predictors tested (independent variables) were energy (mono/bipolar), tube patency (with/without tubal ligation), hysterometry (cm), age ≤ 50 years, body surface area (m(2)), surgical complexity (with/without myomectomy) and duration (min). Mean intravasation was significantly higher when myomectomy was performed (442 ± 616 versus 223 ± 332 mL; p
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-720320140005139
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3c0d0a8c47d0466d92cb6928e99037be</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0100_72032015000100024</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3c0d0a8c47d0466d92cb6928e99037be</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1652426329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d664044352247db3293d8e994cab7bf0887ea47aec00d9e531876b7f857c50193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcuKFDEUDaI4besnKFm66fHmUUnFnQw-BgYU1HVIJbdm0lR3yqSqhwY_3vRjGlwluZxH7jmEvGVwzRoDH34CA1hpDoIDkwDQMGGekQVrQa2MEOY5WVwgV-RVKWsArkUrX5Ir3ijQjKsF-fsjY4h-SrnQ1NN-mGOgcTtlt3PFTTFtaZhz3N7TNGKugx3Sh32ZMKfi07j_SB0dM46D224x1GsqI_ojLHUF8-6o4QZapjns6WOcHigHoN4VLK_Ji94NBd-czyX5_eXzr5tvq7vvX29vPt2tvFRsWgWlJEgpGs6lDp3gRoQWjZHedbrroW01OqkdeoBgsBGs1arTfdto3wAzYkluT7ohubUdc9y4vLfJRXscpHxvXZ6iH9AKDwFc66sRSKWC4b5Thh_sQOgOq9b1Sav4iEOy6zTnul-xx0LsuZCmFlKfwGUlvD8RajZ_ZiyT3cTicaiJYZqLZarhkqvDVkvSnKC-xlgy9pe_MrCH1v83eWq98t6dLeZug-HCeqpZ_AMauqYD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652426329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas ; Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura ; Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida ; Sessa, Felipe Ventura ; Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas ; Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura ; Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida ; Sessa, Felipe Ventura ; Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</creatorcontrib><description>To verify the predictors of intravasation rate during hysteroscopy. Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II(-1)). All cases (n=200 women; 22 to 86 years old) were treated in an operating room setting. Considering respective bag overfill to calculate water balance, we tested two multiple linear regression models: one for total intravasation (mL) and the other for absorption rate (mL.min(-1)). The predictors tested (independent variables) were energy (mono/bipolar), tube patency (with/without tubal ligation), hysterometry (cm), age ≤ 50 years, body surface area (m(2)), surgical complexity (with/without myomectomy) and duration (min). Mean intravasation was significantly higher when myomectomy was performed (442 ± 616 versus 223 ± 332 mL; p&lt;0.01). In the proposed multiple linear regression models for total intravasation (adjusted R(2)=0.44; p&lt;0.01), the only significant predictors were myomectomy and duration (p&lt;0.01).In the proposed model for intravasation rate (R(2)=0.39; p&lt;0.01), only myomectomy and hysterometry were significant predictors (p=0.02 and p&lt;0.01, respectively). Not only myomectomy but also hysterometry were significant predictors of intravasation rate during operative hysteroscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-7203</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0100-720320140005139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25607126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy - methods ; Intraoperative Complications - etiology ; Middle Aged ; OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY ; Prospective Studies ; Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2015-01, Vol.37 (1), p.24-29</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d664044352247db3293d8e994cab7bf0887ea47aec00d9e531876b7f857c50193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25607126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessa, Felipe Ventura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases</title><title>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><description>To verify the predictors of intravasation rate during hysteroscopy. Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II(-1)). All cases (n=200 women; 22 to 86 years old) were treated in an operating room setting. Considering respective bag overfill to calculate water balance, we tested two multiple linear regression models: one for total intravasation (mL) and the other for absorption rate (mL.min(-1)). The predictors tested (independent variables) were energy (mono/bipolar), tube patency (with/without tubal ligation), hysterometry (cm), age ≤ 50 years, body surface area (m(2)), surgical complexity (with/without myomectomy) and duration (min). Mean intravasation was significantly higher when myomectomy was performed (442 ± 616 versus 223 ± 332 mL; p&lt;0.01). In the proposed multiple linear regression models for total intravasation (adjusted R(2)=0.44; p&lt;0.01), the only significant predictors were myomectomy and duration (p&lt;0.01).In the proposed model for intravasation rate (R(2)=0.39; p&lt;0.01), only myomectomy and hysterometry were significant predictors (p=0.02 and p&lt;0.01, respectively). Not only myomectomy but also hysterometry were significant predictors of intravasation rate during operative hysteroscopy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUcuKFDEUDaI4besnKFm66fHmUUnFnQw-BgYU1HVIJbdm0lR3yqSqhwY_3vRjGlwluZxH7jmEvGVwzRoDH34CA1hpDoIDkwDQMGGekQVrQa2MEOY5WVwgV-RVKWsArkUrX5Ir3ijQjKsF-fsjY4h-SrnQ1NN-mGOgcTtlt3PFTTFtaZhz3N7TNGKugx3Sh32ZMKfi07j_SB0dM46D224x1GsqI_ojLHUF8-6o4QZapjns6WOcHigHoN4VLK_Ji94NBd-czyX5_eXzr5tvq7vvX29vPt2tvFRsWgWlJEgpGs6lDp3gRoQWjZHedbrroW01OqkdeoBgsBGs1arTfdto3wAzYkluT7ohubUdc9y4vLfJRXscpHxvXZ6iH9AKDwFc66sRSKWC4b5Thh_sQOgOq9b1Sav4iEOy6zTnul-xx0LsuZCmFlKfwGUlvD8RajZ_ZiyT3cTicaiJYZqLZarhkqvDVkvSnKC-xlgy9pe_MrCH1v83eWq98t6dLeZug-HCeqpZ_AMauqYD</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas</creator><creator>Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura</creator><creator>Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida</creator><creator>Sessa, Felipe Ventura</creator><creator>Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</creator><general>Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases</title><author>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas ; Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura ; Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida ; Sessa, Felipe Ventura ; Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d664044352247db3293d8e994cab7bf0887ea47aec00d9e531876b7f857c50193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNECOLOGY</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessa, Felipe Ventura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonseca, Márlon de Freitas</au><au>Andrade Junior, Claudio Moura</au><au>Nogueira, Eduardo de Almeida</au><au>Sessa, Felipe Ventura</au><au>Crispi, Claudio Peixoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>24-29</pages><issn>0100-7203</issn><issn>1806-9339</issn><eissn>1806-9339</eissn><abstract>To verify the predictors of intravasation rate during hysteroscopy. Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II(-1)). All cases (n=200 women; 22 to 86 years old) were treated in an operating room setting. Considering respective bag overfill to calculate water balance, we tested two multiple linear regression models: one for total intravasation (mL) and the other for absorption rate (mL.min(-1)). The predictors tested (independent variables) were energy (mono/bipolar), tube patency (with/without tubal ligation), hysterometry (cm), age ≤ 50 years, body surface area (m(2)), surgical complexity (with/without myomectomy) and duration (min). Mean intravasation was significantly higher when myomectomy was performed (442 ± 616 versus 223 ± 332 mL; p&lt;0.01). In the proposed multiple linear regression models for total intravasation (adjusted R(2)=0.44; p&lt;0.01), the only significant predictors were myomectomy and duration (p&lt;0.01).In the proposed model for intravasation rate (R(2)=0.39; p&lt;0.01), only myomectomy and hysterometry were significant predictors (p=0.02 and p&lt;0.01, respectively). Not only myomectomy but also hysterometry were significant predictors of intravasation rate during operative hysteroscopy.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia</pub><pmid>25607126</pmid><doi>10.1590/S0100-720320140005139</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0100-7203
ispartof Revista Brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia, 2015-01, Vol.37 (1), p.24-29
issn 0100-7203
1806-9339
1806-9339
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3c0d0a8c47d0466d92cb6928e99037be
source SciELO
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Hysteroscopy - methods
Intraoperative Complications - etiology
Middle Aged
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Prospective Studies
Therapeutic Irrigation - adverse effects
Young Adult
title Predictors of fluid intravasation during operative hysteroscopy: a preplanned prospective observational study with 200 cases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20fluid%20intravasation%20during%20operative%20hysteroscopy:%20a%20preplanned%20prospective%20observational%20study%20with%20200%20cases&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20ginecologia%20e%20obstetr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Fonseca,%20M%C3%A1rlon%20de%20Freitas&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=24-29&rft.issn=0100-7203&rft.eissn=1806-9339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0100-720320140005139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1652426329%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d664044352247db3293d8e994cab7bf0887ea47aec00d9e531876b7f857c50193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652426329&rft_id=info:pmid/25607126&rft_scielo_id=S0100_72032015000100024&rfr_iscdi=true