Loading…

Remediation processes of hexavalent chromium from groundwater: a short review

Understanding the sources and controlling processes of various groundwater contaminants and their removal methods is extremely important, as groundwater contamination is intricately linked to human health. Chromium (Cr) is a common groundwater contaminant with both natural and anthropogenic origins....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aqua (London, England) England), 2023-05, Vol.72 (5), p.648-662
Main Authors: Acharyya, Sukanya, Das, Anirban, Thaker, T. P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding the sources and controlling processes of various groundwater contaminants and their removal methods is extremely important, as groundwater contamination is intricately linked to human health. Chromium (Cr) is a common groundwater contaminant with both natural and anthropogenic origins. Dissolved Cr exists in hexavalent and trivalent forms – while the former is carcinogenic and more soluble – the latter is a micronutrient at low levels and is less soluble. Therefore, most chromium removal methods rely on reducing the hexavalent chromium to its trivalent state to decrease the Cr-toxicity. In recent years, several experimental methods have been attempted for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous media/groundwater. This paper reviews the recent findings on Cr removal by important, effective, and widely used methods such as adsorption by nanoscale zero-valent Fe-based and conventional materials, electrocoagulation (EC), and bioremediation. The reaction pathways, mechanisms, and effectiveness of each method are also highlighted. The role of parameters such as solution pH and temperature, initial Cr(VI) concentration, contact time with the reducing agent, adsorbent dose, and the presence of competing ions on Cr removal was evaluated. Many of the methods exhibit high (>90%) Cr removal efficiency; the main challenge would be to apply these methods for large-scale water treatment.
ISSN:2709-8028
2709-8036
DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.123