Bartonella vinsonii subsp. arupensis infection in animals of veterinary importance, ticks and biopsy samples

• Published in: New microbes and new infections 2020-03, Vol.34, p.100652, Article 100652
• Main Authors: Chochlakis, D., Cutler, S., Giadinis, N.D., Psaroulaki, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: (s) from the Special Issue on Infections in Greece; Animals of veterinary importance; Bartonella; biopsy sample; tick
• ISSN: 2052-2975; 2052-2975
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100652

Testing for vector-borne pathogens in livestock is largely reliant upon blood and tissue. The role of biopsy samples remains poorly explored for detecting tick-borne bacteria in animals. In a 2-year survey, animals of veterinary importance from farms throughout the northern part of Greece were routinely checked for the presence of biopsy samples. Where detected, either a portion or a biopsy was collected together with whole blood samples and any ticks at the site of the biopsy sample. Molecular testing was carried out by real-time PCR targeting the internal transcribed spacer gene of Bartonella species. A total of 68 samples (28 blood samples, 28 biopsy samples and 12 ticks (nine Rhipicephalus bursa and three Rhipicephalus turanicus)) were collected from goats (64 samples) and cattle (four samples). Eight (11.8%) of the 68 samples were positive for Bartonella species. Of the biopsy and whole blood samples, four (14.3%) of each type were positive for Bartonella species. None of the ticks tested positive for Bartonella species. All pairs of positive biopsy samples/whole blood samples originated from the same animals. Positive samples were identified as Bartonella vinsonii subsp. arupensis. Although many more samples from a much wider spectrum of animal species is required before concluding upon the merit of biopsy samples in the study of tick-borne diseases, the significance of our finding warrants further study, both for clinical consequences in small ruminants and for those humans who are farming infected animals.