Stance Detection with Explanations

Identification of stance has recently gained a lot of attention with the extreme growth of fake news and filter bubbles. Over the last decade, many feature-based and deep-learning approaches have been proposed to solve stance detection. However, almost none of the existing works focus on providing a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computational linguistics - Association for Computational Linguistics 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.193-235
Main Authors: Saha, Rudra Ranajee, Lakshmanan, Laks V. S., Ng, Raymond T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Argument structure
Automatic summarization
Parsing
Redundancy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Identification of stance has recently gained a lot of attention with the extreme growth of fake news and filter bubbles. Over the last decade, many feature-based and deep-learning approaches have been proposed to solve stance detection. However, almost none of the existing works focus on providing a meaningful explanation for their prediction. In this work, we study stance detection with an emphasis on generating explanations for the predicted stance by capturing the pivotal argumentative structure embedded in a document. We propose to build a stance tree that utilizes rhetorical parsing to construct an evidence tree and to use Dempster Shafer Theory to aggregate the evidence. Human studies show that our unsupervised technique of generating stance explanations outperforms the SOTA extractive summarization method in terms of informativeness, non-redundancy, coverage, and overall quality. Furthermore, experiments show that our explanation-based stance prediction excels or matches the performance of the SOTA model on various benchmark datasets.
ISSN:0891-2017
1530-9312
DOI:10.1162/coli_a_00501