Loading…
Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter?
This study examines the factors affecting state annual share of national inventory for each of the hog, dairy, and fed-cattle sectors using data from the 48 contiguous states for 1976 to 2000. The paper develops a state-specific, time-series environmental stringency measure and introduces instrument...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of agricultural and resource economics 2005-04, Vol.30 (1), p.45-68 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 68 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 45 |
| container_title | Journal of agricultural and resource economics |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Herath, D Weersink, A Carpentier, C.L |
| description | This study examines the factors affecting state annual share of national inventory for each of the hog, dairy, and fed-cattle sectors using data from the 48 contiguous states for 1976 to 2000. The paper develops a state-specific, time-series environmental stringency measure and introduces instrumental variables to control for the possible endogeneity bias between livestock production decisions and regulatory stringency. The results indicate that differences in the severity of environmental regulations facing livestock producers have had a significant influence on production decisions in the dairy, and particularly the hog sector. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.22004/ag.econ.30783 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3cf110ed60ed468aaffe915624b22009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40987260</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3cf110ed60ed468aaffe915624b22009</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>40987260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d4153-6e0870e96ae53b889a5bfe41601042c909f05de0a6dac70cc4cffa5150a8bd8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM-LEzEUgAdRsK5evYmDB_fU-vJzEi-LLK4uLHioPQ-vmZeaOjOpSbqw_73ZVjx48BACL1--kK9pXjNYcQ4gP-BuRS7OKwGdEU-aBRe8Wxpu1NNmwUCbpVLAnzcvct4D1BvGLhq3PmAJOLbDw4xTcLmNvi0_qB3DPeUS3c82kysxtWE-zTdzKDS064KF8sd2iC3N9yHFeaK5VE-i3XGsyjjndsJSKF29bJ55HDO9-rNfNJubz9-vvy7vvn25vf50txwkU2KpCUwHZDWSEltjLKqtJ8k0MJDcWbAe1ECAekDXgXPSeY-KKUCzHYwXF83t2TtE3PeHFCZMD33E0J8GMe16TCW4kXrhPGNAg65LaoPoPVmmNJfbx5a2ui7PrkOKv461RD-F7GgccaZ4zH0nhey41VDJ9_8lq04LBqyC7_4B9_GY5lqk50xqKyx_hN6coX2Nn_5-QoI1HT-99vZ87jH2uEsh95s1r_YaSSlpmfgNO_SfNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214693921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>EconLit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Herath, D ; Weersink, A ; Carpentier, C.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Herath, D ; Weersink, A ; Carpentier, C.L</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the factors affecting state annual share of national inventory for each of the hog, dairy, and fed-cattle sectors using data from the 48 contiguous states for 1976 to 2000. The paper develops a state-specific, time-series environmental stringency measure and introduces instrumental variables to control for the possible endogeneity bias between livestock production decisions and regulatory stringency. The results indicate that differences in the severity of environmental regulations facing livestock producers have had a significant influence on production decisions in the dairy, and particularly the hog sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-5502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Logan: Western Agricultural Economics Association</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; agricultural law ; Agriculture ; Bias ; Cattle ; Economic regulation ; environmental law ; environmental policy ; environmental protection ; Environmental regulation ; environmental regulation stringency ; Environmental regulations ; environmental stringency ; Farm economics ; fixed-effects model ; Geographic regions ; geographical variation ; Hogs ; Hypotheses ; Industrial regulation ; instrumental variable ; Inventories ; Livestock ; livestock and meat industry ; Livestock farms ; livestock production ; livestock sector ; location choice ; panel data analysis ; Pollution ; pollution havens ; Regions ; spatial distribution ; Sustainable agriculture ; swine</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2005-04, Vol.30 (1), p.45-68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Western Agricultural Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Western Agricultural Economics Association Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214693921/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214693921?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,25753,27924,27925,36060,36061,37012,37013,44363,44590,58238,58471,74895,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herath, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weersink, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentier, C.L</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter?</title><title>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>This study examines the factors affecting state annual share of national inventory for each of the hog, dairy, and fed-cattle sectors using data from the 48 contiguous states for 1976 to 2000. The paper develops a state-specific, time-series environmental stringency measure and introduces instrumental variables to control for the possible endogeneity bias between livestock production decisions and regulatory stringency. The results indicate that differences in the severity of environmental regulations facing livestock producers have had a significant influence on production decisions in the dairy, and particularly the hog sector.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>agricultural law</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>environmental law</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental regulation</subject><subject>environmental regulation stringency</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>environmental stringency</subject><subject>Farm economics</subject><subject>fixed-effects model</subject><subject>Geographic regions</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Industrial regulation</subject><subject>instrumental variable</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>livestock and meat industry</subject><subject>Livestock farms</subject><subject>livestock production</subject><subject>livestock sector</subject><subject>location choice</subject><subject>panel data analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution havens</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>spatial distribution</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>swine</subject><issn>1068-5502</issn><issn>2327-8285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM-LEzEUgAdRsK5evYmDB_fU-vJzEi-LLK4uLHioPQ-vmZeaOjOpSbqw_73ZVjx48BACL1--kK9pXjNYcQ4gP-BuRS7OKwGdEU-aBRe8Wxpu1NNmwUCbpVLAnzcvct4D1BvGLhq3PmAJOLbDw4xTcLmNvi0_qB3DPeUS3c82kysxtWE-zTdzKDS064KF8sd2iC3N9yHFeaK5VE-i3XGsyjjndsJSKF29bJ55HDO9-rNfNJubz9-vvy7vvn25vf50txwkU2KpCUwHZDWSEltjLKqtJ8k0MJDcWbAe1ECAekDXgXPSeY-KKUCzHYwXF83t2TtE3PeHFCZMD33E0J8GMe16TCW4kXrhPGNAg65LaoPoPVmmNJfbx5a2ui7PrkOKv461RD-F7GgccaZ4zH0nhey41VDJ9_8lq04LBqyC7_4B9_GY5lqk50xqKyx_hN6coX2Nn_5-QoI1HT-99vZ87jH2uEsh95s1r_YaSSlpmfgNO_SfNQ</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Herath, D</creator><creator>Weersink, A</creator><creator>Carpentier, C.L</creator><general>Western Agricultural Economics Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter?</title><author>Herath, D ; Weersink, A ; Carpentier, C.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d4153-6e0870e96ae53b889a5bfe41601042c909f05de0a6dac70cc4cffa5150a8bd8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>agricultural law</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>environmental law</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental regulation</topic><topic>environmental regulation stringency</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>environmental stringency</topic><topic>Farm economics</topic><topic>fixed-effects model</topic><topic>Geographic regions</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Industrial regulation</topic><topic>instrumental variable</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>livestock and meat industry</topic><topic>Livestock farms</topic><topic>livestock production</topic><topic>livestock sector</topic><topic>location choice</topic><topic>panel data analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution havens</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>spatial distribution</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herath, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weersink, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentier, C.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herath, D</au><au>Weersink, A</au><au>Carpentier, C.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>45-68</pages><issn>1068-5502</issn><eissn>2327-8285</eissn><abstract>This study examines the factors affecting state annual share of national inventory for each of the hog, dairy, and fed-cattle sectors using data from the 48 contiguous states for 1976 to 2000. The paper develops a state-specific, time-series environmental stringency measure and introduces instrumental variables to control for the possible endogeneity bias between livestock production decisions and regulatory stringency. The results indicate that differences in the severity of environmental regulations facing livestock producers have had a significant influence on production decisions in the dairy, and particularly the hog sector.</abstract><cop>Logan</cop><pub>Western Agricultural Economics Association</pub><doi>10.22004/ag.econ.30783</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1068-5502 |
| ispartof | Journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2005-04, Vol.30 (1), p.45-68 |
| issn | 1068-5502 2327-8285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3cf110ed60ed468aaffe915624b22009 |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; EconLit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global |
| subjects | Agglomeration agricultural law Agriculture Bias Cattle Economic regulation environmental law environmental policy environmental protection Environmental regulation environmental regulation stringency Environmental regulations environmental stringency Farm economics fixed-effects model Geographic regions geographical variation Hogs Hypotheses Industrial regulation instrumental variable Inventories Livestock livestock and meat industry Livestock farms livestock production livestock sector location choice panel data analysis Pollution pollution havens Regions spatial distribution Sustainable agriculture swine |
| title | Spatial dynamics of the livestock sector in the United States: do environmental regulations matter? |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20dynamics%20of%20the%20livestock%20sector%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20do%20environmental%20regulations%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Herath,%20D&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=45-68&rft.issn=1068-5502&rft.eissn=2327-8285&rft_id=info:doi/10.22004/ag.econ.30783&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E40987260%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d4153-6e0870e96ae53b889a5bfe41601042c909f05de0a6dac70cc4cffa5150a8bd8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214693921&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40987260&rfr_iscdi=true |