Loading…

Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease

The clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still debatable. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether repeat renal biopsy is a reliable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions. Laboratory and histological parameters and therapeutic changes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of rheumatology 2020-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2-8
Main Authors: Marinaki, Smaragdi, Kapsia, Eleni, Liapis, George, Gakiopoulou, Hariklia, Skalioti, Chrysanthi, Kolovou, Kyriaki, Boletis, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-4c648a80df8e6458feed04e29520332238735eef26e3cc68aecbbd7237dfbc293
cites
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title European journal of rheumatology
container_volume 7
creator Marinaki, Smaragdi
Kapsia, Eleni
Liapis, George
Gakiopoulou, Hariklia
Skalioti, Chrysanthi
Kolovou, Kyriaki
Boletis, John
description The clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still debatable. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether repeat renal biopsy is a reliable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions. Laboratory and histological parameters and therapeutic changes in 35 patients with LN and repeat renal biopsies were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsies were performed in the presence of clinical evidence of an active glomerular disease. Biopsy specimens were retrospectively re-assessed by two renal pathologists and were compared according to the last International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society classification. Thirty-five patients had two, 13 had three, 5 had four, 4 had five, and 1 had six renal biopsies. Fifty-eight comparisons of renal biopsies were made. Median times between the first and second, second and third, third and fourth, and fourth and fifth biopsies were 31, 27, 34, and 28 months, respectively. The mean activity indices from the first to the fifth biopsy were 8.7, 6.6, 7.8, 9.4, and 4.7, whereas the mean chronicity indices were 1.7, 2.3, 4.3, 5.2, and 7.7, respectively. Conversion was observed in 65.5% of cases with the most frequent (21%) being between classes III and IV. Conversion to a more severe type of nephritis occurred in 19% of cases. There was no correlation of laboratory parameters to the type of nephritis upon conversion. In 79% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after repeat biopsy. Repeat biopsy is a reliable tool for monitoring the activity and chronicity status of LN and for tailoring immunosuppressive therapy to the needs of the patient, especially late in the course of the disease.
doi_str_mv 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18146
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3cf720a26c234625b935ae427d1657f8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A624972453</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3cf720a26c234625b935ae427d1657f8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A624972453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-4c648a80df8e6458feed04e29520332238735eef26e3cc68aecbbd7237dfbc293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl2L1DAULaK4y7r_QCTgiy8zNh9NWh-EZfFjYUEQfQ5pejNzh7apSboyf8NfbDqzjg5IHm5yc87JvTenKF7Scl3Rir2FOezCFuZhzUrarGlNhXxSXDIq6pVgqnl62KtVo1h5UVzHuCvLkirGGqqeFxecqpopRi-LX7c9jmhNT3CYjE3EOxJgApNyGHO6RT9FhEhwJJNJCGOK5CemLennaY5khGkbMGF8R77-JewJRgIxZjTmHMQJbN70e9KbBGERS1sg1s8hwvLmcuowgonwonjmTB_h-jFeFd8_fvh2-3l1_-XT3e3N_coKRdNKWClqU5edq0GKqnYAXSmANRUrOWeM14pXAI5J4NbK2oBt204xrjrXWtbwq-LuqNt5s9NTwMGEvfYG9SHhw0abkND2oLl1eZCGScu4kKxqG14ZyIPuqKyUq7PW-6PWNLcDdDb3HUx_Jnp-M-JWb_yDVvlbmkZmgTePAsH_mCEmPWC00PdmBD9HzXjuSlWSL9DXR-jG5NJwdD4r2gWubyQT-ctFxTNq_R9UXh0MaP0IDnP-jCCOBBt8jAHcqXpa6sV0-mQ6vZhOH0yXaa_-7fxE-mMx_huW59dr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2320375636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Marinaki, Smaragdi ; Kapsia, Eleni ; Liapis, George ; Gakiopoulou, Hariklia ; Skalioti, Chrysanthi ; Kolovou, Kyriaki ; Boletis, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Marinaki, Smaragdi ; Kapsia, Eleni ; Liapis, George ; Gakiopoulou, Hariklia ; Skalioti, Chrysanthi ; Kolovou, Kyriaki ; Boletis, John ; 1st Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece ; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still debatable. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether repeat renal biopsy is a reliable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions. Laboratory and histological parameters and therapeutic changes in 35 patients with LN and repeat renal biopsies were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsies were performed in the presence of clinical evidence of an active glomerular disease. Biopsy specimens were retrospectively re-assessed by two renal pathologists and were compared according to the last International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society classification. Thirty-five patients had two, 13 had three, 5 had four, 4 had five, and 1 had six renal biopsies. Fifty-eight comparisons of renal biopsies were made. Median times between the first and second, second and third, third and fourth, and fourth and fifth biopsies were 31, 27, 34, and 28 months, respectively. The mean activity indices from the first to the fifth biopsy were 8.7, 6.6, 7.8, 9.4, and 4.7, whereas the mean chronicity indices were 1.7, 2.3, 4.3, 5.2, and 7.7, respectively. Conversion was observed in 65.5% of cases with the most frequent (21%) being between classes III and IV. Conversion to a more severe type of nephritis occurred in 19% of cases. There was no correlation of laboratory parameters to the type of nephritis upon conversion. In 79% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after repeat biopsy. Repeat biopsy is a reliable tool for monitoring the activity and chronicity status of LN and for tailoring immunosuppressive therapy to the needs of the patient, especially late in the course of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2147-9720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-4279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31782721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: AVES</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Diseases ; Health aspects ; Immunotherapy ; Kidney diseases ; Lupus ; Medical societies ; Mycophenolate sodium ; Nephritis ; Original</subject><ispartof>European journal of rheumatology, 2020-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2-8</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 AVES</rights><rights>Copyright by 2020 Medical Research and Education Association 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-4c648a80df8e6458feed04e29520332238735eef26e3cc68aecbbd7237dfbc293</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3228-0433 ; 0000-0001-5366-1214 ; 0000-0002-2247-3613 ; 0000-0003-4634-9868 ; 0000-0001-8202-2892 ; 0000-0002-0025-4495 ; 0000-0003-4329-4849</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001996/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001996/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31782721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marinaki, Smaragdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapsia, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liapis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gakiopoulou, Hariklia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skalioti, Chrysanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolovou, Kyriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boletis, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>1st Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease</title><title>European journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Rheumatol</addtitle><description>The clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still debatable. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether repeat renal biopsy is a reliable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions. Laboratory and histological parameters and therapeutic changes in 35 patients with LN and repeat renal biopsies were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsies were performed in the presence of clinical evidence of an active glomerular disease. Biopsy specimens were retrospectively re-assessed by two renal pathologists and were compared according to the last International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society classification. Thirty-five patients had two, 13 had three, 5 had four, 4 had five, and 1 had six renal biopsies. Fifty-eight comparisons of renal biopsies were made. Median times between the first and second, second and third, third and fourth, and fourth and fifth biopsies were 31, 27, 34, and 28 months, respectively. The mean activity indices from the first to the fifth biopsy were 8.7, 6.6, 7.8, 9.4, and 4.7, whereas the mean chronicity indices were 1.7, 2.3, 4.3, 5.2, and 7.7, respectively. Conversion was observed in 65.5% of cases with the most frequent (21%) being between classes III and IV. Conversion to a more severe type of nephritis occurred in 19% of cases. There was no correlation of laboratory parameters to the type of nephritis upon conversion. In 79% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after repeat biopsy. Repeat biopsy is a reliable tool for monitoring the activity and chronicity status of LN and for tailoring immunosuppressive therapy to the needs of the patient, especially late in the course of the disease.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Medical societies</subject><subject>Mycophenolate sodium</subject><subject>Nephritis</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2147-9720</issn><issn>2148-4279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl2L1DAULaK4y7r_QCTgiy8zNh9NWh-EZfFjYUEQfQ5pejNzh7apSboyf8NfbDqzjg5IHm5yc87JvTenKF7Scl3Rir2FOezCFuZhzUrarGlNhXxSXDIq6pVgqnl62KtVo1h5UVzHuCvLkirGGqqeFxecqpopRi-LX7c9jmhNT3CYjE3EOxJgApNyGHO6RT9FhEhwJJNJCGOK5CemLennaY5khGkbMGF8R77-JewJRgIxZjTmHMQJbN70e9KbBGERS1sg1s8hwvLmcuowgonwonjmTB_h-jFeFd8_fvh2-3l1_-XT3e3N_coKRdNKWClqU5edq0GKqnYAXSmANRUrOWeM14pXAI5J4NbK2oBt204xrjrXWtbwq-LuqNt5s9NTwMGEvfYG9SHhw0abkND2oLl1eZCGScu4kKxqG14ZyIPuqKyUq7PW-6PWNLcDdDb3HUx_Jnp-M-JWb_yDVvlbmkZmgTePAsH_mCEmPWC00PdmBD9HzXjuSlWSL9DXR-jG5NJwdD4r2gWubyQT-ctFxTNq_R9UXh0MaP0IDnP-jCCOBBt8jAHcqXpa6sV0-mQ6vZhOH0yXaa_-7fxE-mMx_huW59dr</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Marinaki, Smaragdi</creator><creator>Kapsia, Eleni</creator><creator>Liapis, George</creator><creator>Gakiopoulou, Hariklia</creator><creator>Skalioti, Chrysanthi</creator><creator>Kolovou, Kyriaki</creator><creator>Boletis, John</creator><general>AVES</general><general>Medical Research and Education Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-0433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-3613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-9868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-2892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-4495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-4849</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease</title><author>Marinaki, Smaragdi ; Kapsia, Eleni ; Liapis, George ; Gakiopoulou, Hariklia ; Skalioti, Chrysanthi ; Kolovou, Kyriaki ; Boletis, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-4c648a80df8e6458feed04e29520332238735eef26e3cc68aecbbd7237dfbc293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Medical societies</topic><topic>Mycophenolate sodium</topic><topic>Nephritis</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marinaki, Smaragdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapsia, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liapis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gakiopoulou, Hariklia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skalioti, Chrysanthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolovou, Kyriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boletis, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>1st Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>European journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marinaki, Smaragdi</au><au>Kapsia, Eleni</au><au>Liapis, George</au><au>Gakiopoulou, Hariklia</au><au>Skalioti, Chrysanthi</au><au>Kolovou, Kyriaki</au><au>Boletis, John</au><aucorp>1st Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease</atitle><jtitle>European journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>2-8</pages><issn>2147-9720</issn><eissn>2148-4279</eissn><abstract>The clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) is still debatable. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess whether repeat renal biopsy is a reliable tool in guiding therapeutic decisions. Laboratory and histological parameters and therapeutic changes in 35 patients with LN and repeat renal biopsies were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsies were performed in the presence of clinical evidence of an active glomerular disease. Biopsy specimens were retrospectively re-assessed by two renal pathologists and were compared according to the last International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society classification. Thirty-five patients had two, 13 had three, 5 had four, 4 had five, and 1 had six renal biopsies. Fifty-eight comparisons of renal biopsies were made. Median times between the first and second, second and third, third and fourth, and fourth and fifth biopsies were 31, 27, 34, and 28 months, respectively. The mean activity indices from the first to the fifth biopsy were 8.7, 6.6, 7.8, 9.4, and 4.7, whereas the mean chronicity indices were 1.7, 2.3, 4.3, 5.2, and 7.7, respectively. Conversion was observed in 65.5% of cases with the most frequent (21%) being between classes III and IV. Conversion to a more severe type of nephritis occurred in 19% of cases. There was no correlation of laboratory parameters to the type of nephritis upon conversion. In 79% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after repeat biopsy. Repeat biopsy is a reliable tool for monitoring the activity and chronicity status of LN and for tailoring immunosuppressive therapy to the needs of the patient, especially late in the course of the disease.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>AVES</pub><pmid>31782721</pmid><doi>10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18146</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-0433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-3613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-9868</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-2892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-4495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-4849</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2147-9720
ispartof European journal of rheumatology, 2020-01, Vol.7 (1), p.2-8
issn 2147-9720
2148-4279
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3cf720a26c234625b935ae427d1657f8
source PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Diseases
Health aspects
Immunotherapy
Kidney diseases
Lupus
Medical societies
Mycophenolate sodium
Nephritis
Original
title Clinical impact of repeat renal biopsies in patients with lupus nephritis: Renal biopsy is essential especially later in the course of the disease
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A01%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20impact%20of%20repeat%20renal%20biopsies%20in%20patients%20with%20lupus%20nephritis:%20Renal%20biopsy%20is%20essential%20especially%20later%20in%20the%20course%20of%20the%20disease&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=Marinaki,%20Smaragdi&rft.aucorp=1st%20Department%20of%20Pathology,%20National%20and%20Kapodistrian%20University%20of%20Athens,%20School%20of%20Medicine,%20Laiko%20Hospital,%20Athens,%20Greece&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=2-8&rft.issn=2147-9720&rft.eissn=2148-4279&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18146&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA624972453%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-4c648a80df8e6458feed04e29520332238735eef26e3cc68aecbbd7237dfbc293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2320375636&rft_id=info:pmid/31782721&rft_galeid=A624972453&rfr_iscdi=true