Loading…

HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL

To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for imm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta ortopedica brasileira 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293
Main Authors: Nacif, Gustavo Chaves, Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose, de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe, Fernandes, Marcela, Bellot, João Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603
container_end_page 293
container_issue 5
container_start_page 290
container_title Acta ortopedica brasileira
container_volume 26
creator Nacif, Gustavo Chaves
Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose
de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe
Fernandes, Marcela
Bellot, João Carlos
description To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1413-785220182605184659
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1413_78522018000500290</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2137466844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUtRCIjcFfgDzyQMZ1_JkXpKzLaKSKorQTEi-WYzsjVVoPu0Xav59L10GfruV7zrlH5yD0AcMlZiV8xhSTXEhWFIBlwYFhSTkrX6BzLKHMKQX-Mr2PqDP0JsYVABNElq_RGQHKqQBxjj5N5z-yxaT6Pp0319lNW02Wt229yKq2zpZtXS3r66z5ll211c9m9ha96vUY3buneYFub-rlZJrP5l-bSTXLTTK0zQl2DHpiCWbAnYCOlYZabY3GXWFMzw3VwDGmjHcd7rB21EoLIg3DJAdygZqDrvV6pe7DsNbhQXk9qL8fPtwpHbaDGZ0iVvCSYat10VOwuGPOOUtEaRjtJbCkdXnQimZwo1crvwubZF4t9umoY4aQwgEoyv3xLwfC_a5bO2vcZhv0eOLidLMZfqk7_0fxJMSZTAIfnwSC_71zcavWQzRuHPXG-V1UBSaCci4pTVBxgJrgYwyufz6DQe2LVicm_xWdmO__d_nMOzZLHgGyHJwF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137466844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-7852</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1809-4406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1809-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220182605184659</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30464707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: ATHA EDITORA</publisher><subject>Cross-sectional studies ; Diagnosis ; Fractures, bone ; Original ; ORTHOPEDICS ; Pseudarthrosis ; Scaphoid bone</subject><ispartof>Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4933-4007 ; 0000-0002-7881-5475 ; 0000-0003-1646-6764 ; 0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220658/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><title>Acta ortopedica brasileira</title><addtitle>Acta Ortop Bras</addtitle><description>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</description><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Fractures, bone</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>ORTHOPEDICS</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis</subject><subject>Scaphoid bone</subject><issn>1413-7852</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUtRCIjcFfgDzyQMZ1_JkXpKzLaKSKorQTEi-WYzsjVVoPu0Xav59L10GfruV7zrlH5yD0AcMlZiV8xhSTXEhWFIBlwYFhSTkrX6BzLKHMKQX-Mr2PqDP0JsYVABNElq_RGQHKqQBxjj5N5z-yxaT6Pp0319lNW02Wt229yKq2zpZtXS3r66z5ll211c9m9ha96vUY3buneYFub-rlZJrP5l-bSTXLTTK0zQl2DHpiCWbAnYCOlYZabY3GXWFMzw3VwDGmjHcd7rB21EoLIg3DJAdygZqDrvV6pe7DsNbhQXk9qL8fPtwpHbaDGZ0iVvCSYat10VOwuGPOOUtEaRjtJbCkdXnQimZwo1crvwubZF4t9umoY4aQwgEoyv3xLwfC_a5bO2vcZhv0eOLidLMZfqk7_0fxJMSZTAIfnwSC_71zcavWQzRuHPXG-V1UBSaCci4pTVBxgJrgYwyufz6DQe2LVicm_xWdmO__d_nMOzZLHgGyHJwF</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creator><creator>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creator><creator>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creator><creator>Fernandes, Marcela</creator><creator>Bellot, João Carlos</creator><general>ATHA EDITORA</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-4007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-5475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-6764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><author>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Fractures, bone</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>ORTHOPEDICS</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis</topic><topic>Scaphoid bone</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta ortopedica brasileira</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</au><au>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</au><au>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</au><au>Fernandes, Marcela</au><au>Bellot, João Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</atitle><jtitle>Acta ortopedica brasileira</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ortop Bras</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>290-293</pages><issn>1413-7852</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><eissn>1809-4406</eissn><abstract>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02). We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>ATHA EDITORA</pub><pmid>30464707</pmid><doi>10.1590/1413-785220182605184659</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-4007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-5475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-6764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1413-7852
ispartof Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293
issn 1413-7852
1809-4406
1809-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805
source SciELO; PubMed Central
subjects Cross-sectional studies
Diagnosis
Fractures, bone
Original
ORTHOPEDICS
Pseudarthrosis
Scaphoid bone
title HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HOW%20SCAPHOID%20FRACTURES%20ARE%20TREATED%20IN%20BRAZIL&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ortopedica%20brasileira&rft.au=Nacif,%20Gustavo%20Chaves&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=290-293&rft.issn=1413-7852&rft.eissn=1809-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-785220182605184659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2137466844%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137466844&rft_id=info:pmid/30464707&rft_scielo_id=S1413_78522018000500290&rfr_iscdi=true