Loading…
HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL
To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36 Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016). On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for imm...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ortopedica brasileira 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603 |
container_end_page | 293 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Acta ortopedica brasileira |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Nacif, Gustavo Chaves Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe Fernandes, Marcela Bellot, João Carlos |
description | To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications.
Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36
Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016).
On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02).
We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1413-785220182605184659 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1413_78522018000500290</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2137466844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUtRCIjcFfgDzyQMZ1_JkXpKzLaKSKorQTEi-WYzsjVVoPu0Xav59L10GfruV7zrlH5yD0AcMlZiV8xhSTXEhWFIBlwYFhSTkrX6BzLKHMKQX-Mr2PqDP0JsYVABNElq_RGQHKqQBxjj5N5z-yxaT6Pp0319lNW02Wt229yKq2zpZtXS3r66z5ll211c9m9ha96vUY3buneYFub-rlZJrP5l-bSTXLTTK0zQl2DHpiCWbAnYCOlYZabY3GXWFMzw3VwDGmjHcd7rB21EoLIg3DJAdygZqDrvV6pe7DsNbhQXk9qL8fPtwpHbaDGZ0iVvCSYat10VOwuGPOOUtEaRjtJbCkdXnQimZwo1crvwubZF4t9umoY4aQwgEoyv3xLwfC_a5bO2vcZhv0eOLidLMZfqk7_0fxJMSZTAIfnwSC_71zcavWQzRuHPXG-V1UBSaCci4pTVBxgJrgYwyufz6DQe2LVicm_xWdmO__d_nMOzZLHgGyHJwF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137466844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><source>SciELO</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications.
Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36
Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016).
On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02).
We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-7852</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1809-4406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1809-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220182605184659</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30464707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: ATHA EDITORA</publisher><subject>Cross-sectional studies ; Diagnosis ; Fractures, bone ; Original ; ORTHOPEDICS ; Pseudarthrosis ; Scaphoid bone</subject><ispartof>Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4933-4007 ; 0000-0002-7881-5475 ; 0000-0003-1646-6764 ; 0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220658/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220658/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,24130,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><title>Acta ortopedica brasileira</title><addtitle>Acta Ortop Bras</addtitle><description>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications.
Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36
Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016).
On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02).
We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</description><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Fractures, bone</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>ORTHOPEDICS</subject><subject>Pseudarthrosis</subject><subject>Scaphoid bone</subject><issn>1413-7852</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUV1v0zAUtRCIjcFfgDzyQMZ1_JkXpKzLaKSKorQTEi-WYzsjVVoPu0Xav59L10GfruV7zrlH5yD0AcMlZiV8xhSTXEhWFIBlwYFhSTkrX6BzLKHMKQX-Mr2PqDP0JsYVABNElq_RGQHKqQBxjj5N5z-yxaT6Pp0319lNW02Wt229yKq2zpZtXS3r66z5ll211c9m9ha96vUY3buneYFub-rlZJrP5l-bSTXLTTK0zQl2DHpiCWbAnYCOlYZabY3GXWFMzw3VwDGmjHcd7rB21EoLIg3DJAdygZqDrvV6pe7DsNbhQXk9qL8fPtwpHbaDGZ0iVvCSYat10VOwuGPOOUtEaRjtJbCkdXnQimZwo1crvwubZF4t9umoY4aQwgEoyv3xLwfC_a5bO2vcZhv0eOLidLMZfqk7_0fxJMSZTAIfnwSC_71zcavWQzRuHPXG-V1UBSaCci4pTVBxgJrgYwyufz6DQe2LVicm_xWdmO__d_nMOzZLHgGyHJwF</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creator><creator>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creator><creator>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creator><creator>Fernandes, Marcela</creator><creator>Bellot, João Carlos</creator><general>ATHA EDITORA</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-4007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-5475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-6764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</title><author>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves ; Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose ; de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe ; Fernandes, Marcela ; Bellot, João Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Fractures, bone</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>ORTHOPEDICS</topic><topic>Pseudarthrosis</topic><topic>Scaphoid bone</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellot, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta ortopedica brasileira</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nacif, Gustavo Chaves</au><au>Pedro, Fernando Moises Jose</au><au>de Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe</au><au>Fernandes, Marcela</au><au>Bellot, João Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL</atitle><jtitle>Acta ortopedica brasileira</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ortop Bras</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>290-293</pages><issn>1413-7852</issn><issn>1809-4406</issn><eissn>1809-4406</eissn><abstract>To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications.
Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36
Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016).
On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02).
We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>ATHA EDITORA</pub><pmid>30464707</pmid><doi>10.1590/1413-785220182605184659</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-4007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-5475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-6764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-479X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1413-7852 |
ispartof | Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.290-293 |
issn | 1413-7852 1809-4406 1809-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3d76951daa2f40d1b5eeed379c54f805 |
source | SciELO; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cross-sectional studies Diagnosis Fractures, bone Original ORTHOPEDICS Pseudarthrosis Scaphoid bone |
title | HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HOW%20SCAPHOID%20FRACTURES%20ARE%20TREATED%20IN%20BRAZIL&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ortopedica%20brasileira&rft.au=Nacif,%20Gustavo%20Chaves&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=290-293&rft.issn=1413-7852&rft.eissn=1809-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-785220182605184659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2137466844%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-31e50f3d31506e70b59c4dadca1b2ccf6c4a0611456bb1b1ae4d8d07e4dc58603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137466844&rft_id=info:pmid/30464707&rft_scielo_id=S1413_78522018000500290&rfr_iscdi=true |