Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of Maxillary Protraction Using Tooth- and Miniscrew-Anchored Devices in Patients with Class III Malocclusion with Maxillary Deficiency: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study

• Published in: Applied sciences 2023-09, Vol.13 (18), p.10530
• Main Authors: Baik, Jong-Chan, Choi, Youn-Kyung, Jeon, Hyeran Helen, Kim, Sung-Hun, Kim, Seong-Sik, Park, Soo-Byung, Kim, Yong-Il
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; anchor; angle Class III; Care and treatment; Malocclusion; malocclusions; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Orthodontics; pediatric patients; Stainless steel; Teeth; traction appliance; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app131810530

Introduction: This retrospective study aimed to determine skeletal and dental changes after a growth spurt and shortly after treatment using a facemask in skeletal Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency. Methods: We retrospectively studied 50 patients (25 patients per group) with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent facemask treatment with tooth-anchored (T-A, mean age 7.92) and miniscrew-anchored (M-A, mean age 9.84) intraoral appliances. In both groups, the facemask applied a traction force of 350–400 g to each side, such that the traction was directed 30° forward and downward. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained from all patients before (T1), immediately after (T2), and at an average of 37.11 months after maxillary protraction (T3). A total of 13 cephalometric measurements were analyzed to determine the skeletal and dental changes. A paired t-test was used to verify the effects before, after, and during follow-up periods in each group. Results: An anteroposterior relationship, the values of SNA and ANB, evident in both groups at T2, was significantly improved in the M-A group (p < 0.05). However, the values of ANB and MP–SN, which indicate the relapse of anteroposterior and vertical relation of maxilla and mandible, were significantly higher in the T-A group compared with the M-A group during follow-up period. The maxillary first molars were significantly more extruded and maxillary incisors were more protruded in the T-A group than the M-A group, and this persisted at T3 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction increased the skeletal improvement of anteroposterior relationship and reduced the dental and skeletal relapses compared with tooth-anchored maxillary protraction in growing patients with a hyperdivergent patterns and skeletal Class III malocclusion.