Loading…
Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial
Open gingival embrasures form complex aesthetic and functional problems. This clinical trial assessed the bioclear matrix using injection molding technique against conventional celluloid matrix technique in management of black triangle. A total of 26 participants were randomly divided into two group...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC oral health 2023-06, Vol.23 (1), p.402-402, Article 402 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Open gingival embrasures form complex aesthetic and functional problems. This clinical trial assessed the bioclear matrix using injection molding technique against conventional celluloid matrix technique in management of black triangle.
A total of 26 participants were randomly divided into two groups (13 participants each) according to the technique used. In group (A) celluloid conventional matrix method was used, while in group (B) bioclear matrix with injection molding technique was used. The different outcomes (Esthetic evaluation, marginal integrity and patient satisfaction) were evaluated following the FDI criteria by two blinded examiners. The evaluation was done at (T0) (immediate after restoration); (T6) after 6 months; and (T12) after 12 months. Statistical analysis was done as categorical and ordinal data were presented as frequency and percentage values. Categorical data were compared using fisher's exact test. Intergroup comparisons for ordinal data were analyzed utilizing the Mann-Whitney U test, while intragroup comparisons were analyzed using Friedman's test followed by the Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 within all tests.
Regarding radiographic marginal integrity and marginal adaptation, the bioclear matrix group revealed superior results when compared to celluloid matrix group with a significant difference between both groups at all intervals (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-6831 1472-6831 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12903-023-03102-y |