Loading…
Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain
This study aimed to provide an overview of the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance in commercial pig farms in Great Britain. We collected on-farm data about the level of biosecurity and animal performance in 40 fattening pig farms and 28 breeding pig farms between...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in veterinary science 2018-03, Vol.5, p.41-41 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3 |
container_end_page | 41 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Frontiers in veterinary science |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Pandolfi, Fanny Edwards, Sandra A Maes, Dominiek Kyriazakis, Ilias |
description | This study aimed to provide an overview of the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance in commercial pig farms in Great Britain. We collected on-farm data about the level of biosecurity and animal performance in 40 fattening pig farms and 28 breeding pig farms between 2015 and 2016. We identified interconnections between these data, slaughterhouse health indicators, and welfare indicator records in fattening pig farms. After achieving the connections between databases, a secondary data analysis was performed to assess the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and hierarchical clustering. Although we could connect the different data sources the final sample size was limited, suggesting room for improvement in database connection to conduct secondary data analyses. The farm biosecurity scores ranged from 40 to 90 out of 100, with internal biosecurity scores being lower than external biosecurity scores. Our analysis suggested several interconnections between health, welfare, and performance. The initial correlation analysis showed that the prevalence of lameness and severe tail lesions was associated with the prevalence of enzootic pneumonia-like lesions and pyaemia, and the prevalence of severe body marks was associated with several disease indicators, including peritonitis and milk spots (
> 0.3;
0.3;
0.3;
|
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fvets.2018.00041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3f45bfaa80544d6bbbabd13812dc3153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3f45bfaa80544d6bbbabd13812dc3153</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2016532712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkktv1DAUhSMEolXpnhXyksXM4PiROBukdkrbkSpRCRBL68a5nnGV2MV2WvXX8FfJPKjala-uz_muH6coPpZ0wblqvtgHzGnBaKkWlFJRvimOGWvqeVlXzdsX9VFxmtLdJCmlqLmi74sj1siKcqmOi7_L4D2a7PyaXDhrMaLP5AIykB9hjAYTyYGcpYRpqjZIVj5jNAdT8Im0mB8RPTl3IaEZo8tPM3KN0OfNjPzG3kLEGQHfkVuMNsQBvEHiPFmGYZhQDnpy69bkEuKQtv2riJDJ-QQC5z8U7yz0CU8P60nx6_Lbz-X1_Ob71Wp5djM3omJ5DlQwampVi9Z2okRlbF3Rrm7rhipgFNV0YWVqY9umkcAtcFEpKSUDbhQz_KRY7bldgDt9H90A8UkHcHrXCHGtIWZnetTcCtlaAEWlEF3Vti20XclVyTrDS8kn1tc9635sB-zM9KIR-lfQ1zvebfQ6PGiphKzEFvD5AIjhz4gp68Elg30PHsOY9PTnleSsLtkkpXupiSGliPZ5TEn1NiZ6F5OtReldTCbLp5fHezb8DwX_B58svHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2016532712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Pandolfi, Fanny ; Edwards, Sandra A ; Maes, Dominiek ; Kyriazakis, Ilias</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandolfi, Fanny ; Edwards, Sandra A ; Maes, Dominiek ; Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to provide an overview of the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance in commercial pig farms in Great Britain. We collected on-farm data about the level of biosecurity and animal performance in 40 fattening pig farms and 28 breeding pig farms between 2015 and 2016. We identified interconnections between these data, slaughterhouse health indicators, and welfare indicator records in fattening pig farms. After achieving the connections between databases, a secondary data analysis was performed to assess the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and hierarchical clustering. Although we could connect the different data sources the final sample size was limited, suggesting room for improvement in database connection to conduct secondary data analyses. The farm biosecurity scores ranged from 40 to 90 out of 100, with internal biosecurity scores being lower than external biosecurity scores. Our analysis suggested several interconnections between health, welfare, and performance. The initial correlation analysis showed that the prevalence of lameness and severe tail lesions was associated with the prevalence of enzootic pneumonia-like lesions and pyaemia, and the prevalence of severe body marks was associated with several disease indicators, including peritonitis and milk spots (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Higher average daily weight gain (ADG) was associated with lower prevalence of pleurisy (
> 0.3;
< 0.05), but no connection was identified between mortality and health indicators. A subsequent cluster analysis enabled identification of patterns which considered concurrently indicators of health, welfare, and performance. Farms from cluster 1 had lower biosecurity scores, lower ADG, and higher prevalence of several disease and welfare indicators. Farms from cluster 2 had higher biosecurity scores than cluster 1, but a higher prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization and lameness which confirmed the correlation between biosecurity and the prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Farms from cluster 3 had higher biosecurity, higher ADG, and lower prevalence for some disease and welfare indicators. The study suggests a smaller impact of biosecurity on issues such as mortality, prevalence of lameness, and pig requiring hospitalization. The correlations and the identified clusters suggested the importance of animal welfare for the pig industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2297-1769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29560358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>biosecurity ; health ; lameness ; pig ; production performance ; Veterinary Science</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018-03, Vol.5, p.41-41</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Pandolfi, Edwards, Maes and Kyriazakis. 2018 Pandolfi, Edwards, Maes and Kyriazakis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845643/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5845643/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandolfi, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sandra A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><title>Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain</title><title>Frontiers in veterinary science</title><addtitle>Front Vet Sci</addtitle><description>This study aimed to provide an overview of the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance in commercial pig farms in Great Britain. We collected on-farm data about the level of biosecurity and animal performance in 40 fattening pig farms and 28 breeding pig farms between 2015 and 2016. We identified interconnections between these data, slaughterhouse health indicators, and welfare indicator records in fattening pig farms. After achieving the connections between databases, a secondary data analysis was performed to assess the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and hierarchical clustering. Although we could connect the different data sources the final sample size was limited, suggesting room for improvement in database connection to conduct secondary data analyses. The farm biosecurity scores ranged from 40 to 90 out of 100, with internal biosecurity scores being lower than external biosecurity scores. Our analysis suggested several interconnections between health, welfare, and performance. The initial correlation analysis showed that the prevalence of lameness and severe tail lesions was associated with the prevalence of enzootic pneumonia-like lesions and pyaemia, and the prevalence of severe body marks was associated with several disease indicators, including peritonitis and milk spots (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Higher average daily weight gain (ADG) was associated with lower prevalence of pleurisy (
> 0.3;
< 0.05), but no connection was identified between mortality and health indicators. A subsequent cluster analysis enabled identification of patterns which considered concurrently indicators of health, welfare, and performance. Farms from cluster 1 had lower biosecurity scores, lower ADG, and higher prevalence of several disease and welfare indicators. Farms from cluster 2 had higher biosecurity scores than cluster 1, but a higher prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization and lameness which confirmed the correlation between biosecurity and the prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Farms from cluster 3 had higher biosecurity, higher ADG, and lower prevalence for some disease and welfare indicators. The study suggests a smaller impact of biosecurity on issues such as mortality, prevalence of lameness, and pig requiring hospitalization. The correlations and the identified clusters suggested the importance of animal welfare for the pig industry.</description><subject>biosecurity</subject><subject>health</subject><subject>lameness</subject><subject>pig</subject><subject>production performance</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><issn>2297-1769</issn><issn>2297-1769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkktv1DAUhSMEolXpnhXyksXM4PiROBukdkrbkSpRCRBL68a5nnGV2MV2WvXX8FfJPKjala-uz_muH6coPpZ0wblqvtgHzGnBaKkWlFJRvimOGWvqeVlXzdsX9VFxmtLdJCmlqLmi74sj1siKcqmOi7_L4D2a7PyaXDhrMaLP5AIykB9hjAYTyYGcpYRpqjZIVj5jNAdT8Im0mB8RPTl3IaEZo8tPM3KN0OfNjPzG3kLEGQHfkVuMNsQBvEHiPFmGYZhQDnpy69bkEuKQtv2riJDJ-QQC5z8U7yz0CU8P60nx6_Lbz-X1_Ob71Wp5djM3omJ5DlQwampVi9Z2okRlbF3Rrm7rhipgFNV0YWVqY9umkcAtcFEpKSUDbhQz_KRY7bldgDt9H90A8UkHcHrXCHGtIWZnetTcCtlaAEWlEF3Vti20XclVyTrDS8kn1tc9635sB-zM9KIR-lfQ1zvebfQ6PGiphKzEFvD5AIjhz4gp68Elg30PHsOY9PTnleSsLtkkpXupiSGliPZ5TEn1NiZ6F5OtReldTCbLp5fHezb8DwX_B58svHg</recordid><startdate>20180306</startdate><enddate>20180306</enddate><creator>Pandolfi, Fanny</creator><creator>Edwards, Sandra A</creator><creator>Maes, Dominiek</creator><creator>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180306</creationdate><title>Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain</title><author>Pandolfi, Fanny ; Edwards, Sandra A ; Maes, Dominiek ; Kyriazakis, Ilias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>biosecurity</topic><topic>health</topic><topic>lameness</topic><topic>pig</topic><topic>production performance</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandolfi, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sandra A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Dominiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandolfi, Fanny</au><au>Edwards, Sandra A</au><au>Maes, Dominiek</au><au>Kyriazakis, Ilias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in veterinary science</jtitle><addtitle>Front Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2018-03-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>41</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>41-41</pages><issn>2297-1769</issn><eissn>2297-1769</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to provide an overview of the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance in commercial pig farms in Great Britain. We collected on-farm data about the level of biosecurity and animal performance in 40 fattening pig farms and 28 breeding pig farms between 2015 and 2016. We identified interconnections between these data, slaughterhouse health indicators, and welfare indicator records in fattening pig farms. After achieving the connections between databases, a secondary data analysis was performed to assess the interconnections between biosecurity, health, welfare, and performance using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and hierarchical clustering. Although we could connect the different data sources the final sample size was limited, suggesting room for improvement in database connection to conduct secondary data analyses. The farm biosecurity scores ranged from 40 to 90 out of 100, with internal biosecurity scores being lower than external biosecurity scores. Our analysis suggested several interconnections between health, welfare, and performance. The initial correlation analysis showed that the prevalence of lameness and severe tail lesions was associated with the prevalence of enzootic pneumonia-like lesions and pyaemia, and the prevalence of severe body marks was associated with several disease indicators, including peritonitis and milk spots (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Higher average daily weight gain (ADG) was associated with lower prevalence of pleurisy (
> 0.3;
< 0.05), but no connection was identified between mortality and health indicators. A subsequent cluster analysis enabled identification of patterns which considered concurrently indicators of health, welfare, and performance. Farms from cluster 1 had lower biosecurity scores, lower ADG, and higher prevalence of several disease and welfare indicators. Farms from cluster 2 had higher biosecurity scores than cluster 1, but a higher prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization and lameness which confirmed the correlation between biosecurity and the prevalence of pigs requiring hospitalization (
> 0.3;
< 0.05). Farms from cluster 3 had higher biosecurity, higher ADG, and lower prevalence for some disease and welfare indicators. The study suggests a smaller impact of biosecurity on issues such as mortality, prevalence of lameness, and pig requiring hospitalization. The correlations and the identified clusters suggested the importance of animal welfare for the pig industry.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>29560358</pmid><doi>10.3389/fvets.2018.00041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2297-1769 |
ispartof | Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018-03, Vol.5, p.41-41 |
issn | 2297-1769 2297-1769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3f45bfaa80544d6bbbabd13812dc3153 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | biosecurity health lameness pig production performance Veterinary Science |
title | Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Connecting%20Different%20Data%20Sources%20to%20Assess%20the%20Interconnections%20between%20Biosecurity,%20Health,%20Welfare,%20and%20Performance%20in%20Commercial%20Pig%20Farms%20in%20Great%20Britain&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20veterinary%20science&rft.au=Pandolfi,%20Fanny&rft.date=2018-03-06&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=41-41&rft.issn=2297-1769&rft.eissn=2297-1769&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fvets.2018.00041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2016532712%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0420c7874bfd41e8cf760d7b7908a20e85608c7cfb995a3fa34685552a3c82c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2016532712&rft_id=info:pmid/29560358&rfr_iscdi=true |