Self-censorship of regime support in authoritarian states: Evidence from list experiments in China

The study of popular support for authoritarian regimes has long relied on the assumption that respondents provide truthful answers to surveys. However, when measuring regime support in closed political systems there is a distinct risk that individuals are less than forthright due to fear that their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research & politics 2019-07, Vol.6 (3)
Main Authors: Robinson, Darrel, Tannenberg, Marcus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authoritarianism
Bias
Censorship
China
Experiments
Government & Law
list experiment
Political Science
Political support
Political systems
political trust
Public opinion
quality
Respondents
response bias
self-censorship
Statsvetenskap
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study of popular support for authoritarian regimes has long relied on the assumption that respondents provide truthful answers to surveys. However, when measuring regime support in closed political systems there is a distinct risk that individuals are less than forthright due to fear that their opinions may be made known to the public or the authorities. In order to test this assumption, we conducted a novel web-based survey in China in which we included four list experiments of commonly used items in the comparative literature on regime support. We find systematic bias for all four measures; substantially more individuals state that they support the regime with direct questioning than when presented with our indirect list experiments. The level of self-censorship, which ranges from 24.5 to 26.5 percentage points, is considerably higher than previously thought. Self-censorship is further most prevalent among the wealthy, urban, female and younger respondents.
ISSN:2053-1680
2053-1680
DOI:10.1177/2053168019856449