Optical Sensing of Molecular Oxygen (O2) via Metal Oxide Photoluminescence: A Comparative Study of TiO2, SnO2 and ZnO

A comparative study is presented on the photoluminescence (PL) response toward molecular oxygen (O2) in tin dioxide (SnO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. The findings show that both PL enhancement and PL quenching can be observed on different materials, arguably dependi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemosensors 2021-07, Vol.9 (7), p.163
Main Authors: Fioravanti, Ambra, Marani, Pietro, Morandi, Sara, Giordano, Laura, Maddalena, Pasqualino, Carotta, Maria Cristina, Lettieri, Stefano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anatase
Comparative studies
Emission
Gravity
Localization
Luminescence
Metal oxides
Nanoparticles
optical sensors
Oxygen
oxygen sensors
Photocatalysis
Photoluminescence
Photons
Rutile
Semiconductors
Sensitivity
Sensors
Spatial discrimination
Tin
Tin dioxide
Titanium dioxide
Zinc oxide
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A comparative study is presented on the photoluminescence (PL) response toward molecular oxygen (O2) in tin dioxide (SnO2), zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. The findings show that both PL enhancement and PL quenching can be observed on different materials, arguably depending on the spatial localization of the defects responsible for the PL emission in each different oxide. No significant results are evidenced for SnO2 nanoparticles. ZnO with red/orange emission shown an O2-induced PL enhancement, suggesting that the radiative emission involves holes trapped in surface vacancy oxygen centers. While the ZnO results are scientifically interesting, its performances are inferior to the ones shown by TiO2, which exhibits the most interesting response in terms of sensitivity and versatility of the response. In particular, O2 concentrations in the range of few percent and in the range of a few tenths of a part per million are both detectable through the same mixed-phase TiO2 sample, whose rutile phase gives a reversible and fast response to larger (0.4–2%) O2 concentration while its anatase phase is usable for detection in the 25–75 ppm range. The data for rutile TiO2 suggest that its surfaces host deeply trapped electrons at large densities, allowing good sensitivities and, more notably, a relatively unsaturated response at large concentrations. Future work is expected to improve the understanding and modeling of the photophysical framework that lies behind the observations.
ISSN:2227-9040
2227-9040
DOI:10.3390/chemosensors9070163