Loading…

Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model

In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from vio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415
Main Authors: Sindermann, Cornelia, Kuss, Daria J., Throuvala, Melina A., Griffiths, Mark D., Montag, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3
container_end_page 1415
container_issue
container_start_page 1415
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 11
creator Sindermann, Cornelia
Kuss, Daria J.
Throuvala, Melina A.
Griffiths, Mark D.
Montag, Christian
description In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2431808208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs--SZTdOgGHMzKaV6_QnUqxESqsu0R242EQYpjBjyQ_Tdy22o6phA7qc-x0d6VTVe0av6rrtru2Q9-srTjm9okyw5lV1zuZzMWNUtq__e59Vlzk_0XJE0VL-tjqruZzTmvHz6s_jJk7ekF9IHmBPbEzkfkrkMWoHnqzQOLheYc4Y1pjIYhi80zC6GPIn8pDQu60LkPbkBkYgMZBxg2ShNQ4jBI0kWgKBLPyIKZS1HZIxHjXLKSUM44GxA-ddWJ8Qn6fsQvEjq2jQv6veWPAZL5_vi-rn1y8_lt9nd_ffbpeLu5kWdTfOjDBCyk5bY0tE3fZNzZloUAtuGfZzA9D2srWit7yn0BvTMcslMsRu3tRYX1S3J66J8KSG5LYlk4rg1HEQ01pBGp32qAQVZUnIznRcyAZBNgKwh2LIrURaWB9PrGHqt2h0SZnAv4C-_Aluo9Zxp2QtWduwAvjwDEjx94R5VFuXNXoPAeOUFRc1a2nLaVuk9CTVKeac0P6zYVQdSqKOJVGHkqhjSeq_7tiyFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431808208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32760312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>big five ; data business model ; payment model ; personality ; Psychology ; social media ; surveillance capitalism</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sindermann, Kuss, Throuvala, Griffiths and Montag. 2020 Sindermann, Kuss, Throuvala, Griffiths and Montag</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuss, Daria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Throuvala, Melina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</description><subject>big five</subject><subject>data business model</subject><subject>payment model</subject><subject>personality</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>social media</subject><subject>surveillance capitalism</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs--SZTdOgGHMzKaV6_QnUqxESqsu0R242EQYpjBjyQ_Tdy22o6phA7qc-x0d6VTVe0av6rrtru2Q9-srTjm9okyw5lV1zuZzMWNUtq__e59Vlzk_0XJE0VL-tjqruZzTmvHz6s_jJk7ekF9IHmBPbEzkfkrkMWoHnqzQOLheYc4Y1pjIYhi80zC6GPIn8pDQu60LkPbkBkYgMZBxg2ShNQ4jBI0kWgKBLPyIKZS1HZIxHjXLKSUM44GxA-ddWJ8Qn6fsQvEjq2jQv6veWPAZL5_vi-rn1y8_lt9nd_ffbpeLu5kWdTfOjDBCyk5bY0tE3fZNzZloUAtuGfZzA9D2srWit7yn0BvTMcslMsRu3tRYX1S3J66J8KSG5LYlk4rg1HEQ01pBGp32qAQVZUnIznRcyAZBNgKwh2LIrURaWB9PrGHqt2h0SZnAv4C-_Aluo9Zxp2QtWduwAvjwDEjx94R5VFuXNXoPAeOUFRc1a2nLaVuk9CTVKeac0P6zYVQdSqKOJVGHkqhjSeq_7tiyFg</recordid><startdate>20200714</startdate><enddate>20200714</enddate><creator>Sindermann, Cornelia</creator><creator>Kuss, Daria J.</creator><creator>Throuvala, Melina A.</creator><creator>Griffiths, Mark D.</creator><creator>Montag, Christian</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200714</creationdate><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><author>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>big five</topic><topic>data business model</topic><topic>payment model</topic><topic>personality</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>social media</topic><topic>surveillance capitalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuss, Daria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Throuvala, Melina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sindermann, Cornelia</au><au>Kuss, Daria J.</au><au>Throuvala, Melina A.</au><au>Griffiths, Mark D.</au><au>Montag, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2020-07-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>1415</spage><epage>1415</epage><pages>1415-1415</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32760312</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects big five
data business model
payment model
personality
Psychology
social media
surveillance capitalism
title Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20We%20Pay%20for%20Our%20Social%20Media/Messenger%20Applications?%20Preliminary%20Data%20on%20the%20Acceptance%20of%20an%20Alternative%20to%20the%20Current%20Prevailing%20Data%20Business%20Model&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Sindermann,%20Cornelia&rft.date=2020-07-14&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1415&rft.epage=1415&rft.pages=1415-1415&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2431808208%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431808208&rft_id=info:pmid/32760312&rfr_iscdi=true