Loading…
Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from vio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3 |
container_end_page | 1415 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1415 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Sindermann, Cornelia Kuss, Daria J. Throuvala, Melina A. Griffiths, Mark D. Montag, Christian |
description | In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2431808208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs--SZTdOgGHMzKaV6_QnUqxESqsu0R242EQYpjBjyQ_Tdy22o6phA7qc-x0d6VTVe0av6rrtru2Q9-srTjm9okyw5lV1zuZzMWNUtq__e59Vlzk_0XJE0VL-tjqruZzTmvHz6s_jJk7ekF9IHmBPbEzkfkrkMWoHnqzQOLheYc4Y1pjIYhi80zC6GPIn8pDQu60LkPbkBkYgMZBxg2ShNQ4jBI0kWgKBLPyIKZS1HZIxHjXLKSUM44GxA-ddWJ8Qn6fsQvEjq2jQv6veWPAZL5_vi-rn1y8_lt9nd_ffbpeLu5kWdTfOjDBCyk5bY0tE3fZNzZloUAtuGfZzA9D2srWit7yn0BvTMcslMsRu3tRYX1S3J66J8KSG5LYlk4rg1HEQ01pBGp32qAQVZUnIznRcyAZBNgKwh2LIrURaWB9PrGHqt2h0SZnAv4C-_Aluo9Zxp2QtWduwAvjwDEjx94R5VFuXNXoPAeOUFRc1a2nLaVuk9CTVKeac0P6zYVQdSqKOJVGHkqhjSeq_7tiyFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431808208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32760312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>big five ; data business model ; payment model ; personality ; Psychology ; social media ; surveillance capitalism</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sindermann, Kuss, Throuvala, Griffiths and Montag. 2020 Sindermann, Kuss, Throuvala, Griffiths and Montag</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuss, Daria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Throuvala, Melina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</description><subject>big five</subject><subject>data business model</subject><subject>payment model</subject><subject>personality</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>social media</subject><subject>surveillance capitalism</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVks1uGyEUhUdVqyZKs--SZTdOgGHMzKaV6_QnUqxESqsu0R242EQYpjBjyQ_Tdy22o6phA7qc-x0d6VTVe0av6rrtru2Q9-srTjm9okyw5lV1zuZzMWNUtq__e59Vlzk_0XJE0VL-tjqruZzTmvHz6s_jJk7ekF9IHmBPbEzkfkrkMWoHnqzQOLheYc4Y1pjIYhi80zC6GPIn8pDQu60LkPbkBkYgMZBxg2ShNQ4jBI0kWgKBLPyIKZS1HZIxHjXLKSUM44GxA-ddWJ8Qn6fsQvEjq2jQv6veWPAZL5_vi-rn1y8_lt9nd_ffbpeLu5kWdTfOjDBCyk5bY0tE3fZNzZloUAtuGfZzA9D2srWit7yn0BvTMcslMsRu3tRYX1S3J66J8KSG5LYlk4rg1HEQ01pBGp32qAQVZUnIznRcyAZBNgKwh2LIrURaWB9PrGHqt2h0SZnAv4C-_Aluo9Zxp2QtWduwAvjwDEjx94R5VFuXNXoPAeOUFRc1a2nLaVuk9CTVKeac0P6zYVQdSqKOJVGHkqhjSeq_7tiyFg</recordid><startdate>20200714</startdate><enddate>20200714</enddate><creator>Sindermann, Cornelia</creator><creator>Kuss, Daria J.</creator><creator>Throuvala, Melina A.</creator><creator>Griffiths, Mark D.</creator><creator>Montag, Christian</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200714</creationdate><title>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</title><author>Sindermann, Cornelia ; Kuss, Daria J. ; Throuvala, Melina A. ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Montag, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>big five</topic><topic>data business model</topic><topic>payment model</topic><topic>personality</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>social media</topic><topic>surveillance capitalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sindermann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuss, Daria J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Throuvala, Melina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sindermann, Cornelia</au><au>Kuss, Daria J.</au><au>Throuvala, Melina A.</au><au>Griffiths, Mark D.</au><au>Montag, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2020-07-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>1415</spage><epage>1415</epage><pages>1415-1415</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32760312</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1415-1415 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_404e96479d92475ea754aeba2142f7e0 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | big five data business model payment model personality Psychology social media surveillance capitalism |
title | Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20We%20Pay%20for%20Our%20Social%20Media/Messenger%20Applications?%20Preliminary%20Data%20on%20the%20Acceptance%20of%20an%20Alternative%20to%20the%20Current%20Prevailing%20Data%20Business%20Model&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Sindermann,%20Cornelia&rft.date=2020-07-14&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1415&rft.epage=1415&rft.pages=1415-1415&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2431808208%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-d4d4779cfdf402c8b532145ec42f1eb6daa8b78f4bf2b0abdd91f27e1ee9653e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431808208&rft_id=info:pmid/32760312&rfr_iscdi=true |