Clinical Effect Analysis of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Background: There is much controversy about the utility of open and laparoscopic surgery procedures for cervical cancer following the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial. The main objective of this study was to determine the utility of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2024-06, Vol.51 (6), p.129
Main Authors: Xue, Hong, Chen, Meng, Li, Shuqin, Zhou, Yongchun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
abdominal radical hysterectomy
early-stage cervical cancer
laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
pelvic autonomic nerve
survival outcomes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: There is much controversy about the utility of open and laparoscopic surgery procedures for cervical cancer following the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial. The main objective of this study was to determine the utility of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) in improvement of postoperative bladder and rectal function and clinical outcomes of patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and tumor diameters 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is beneficial for patients with common types of early-stage cervical cancer and small tumors. The procedure effectively improves bladder and rectal function after surgery and promotes rapid recovery with no adverse effects on survival outcomes.
ISSN:0390-6663
2709-0094
DOI:10.31083/j.ceog5106129