Integrated approach to pain management for a patient with multiple bone metastases of uterine cervical cancer

• Published in: Journal of international medical research 2018-05, Vol.46 (5), p.2023-2030
• Main Authors: Qin, De-An, Song, Jie-Fu, Song, Li-Ping, Feng, Gui-Sheng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy; Bone Neoplasms - secondary; Bone Neoplasms - surgery; Case Reports; Cervical cancer; Epirubicin - therapeutic use; Female; Humans; Integrated approach; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Metastasis; Middle Aged; Pain Management; Postoperative Care; Radiation therapy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
• ISSN: 0300-0605; 1473-2300
• DOI: 10.1177/0300060518763709

Background Pain management for multiple bone metastases is complex and often requires multidisciplinary treatment. We herein describe patient-centered multidisciplinary pain management for metastatic cancer. Case presentation: A 61-year-old woman with multiple bone metastases of uterine cervical cancer developed intractable low back pain. After external beam radiotherapy failed, we performed lumbar spinal intralesional curettage, pedicle screw fixation, and nerve decompression. However, the neuralgia persisted. We then percutaneously injected epirubicin into the intervertebral foramina under computed tomography guidance for L5 dorsal root ganglion destruction. Osteoplasty was performed under C-arm X-ray guidance; however, the sacrum was mistaken for the ilium, and treatment was ineffective. We administered zoledronic acid and strontium-89. The last resort was outpatient implantation of an epidural bupivacaine-morphine infusion system. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain evaluation. Lumbar spinal intralesional curettage and fixation, epirubicin-induced ganglion destruction, and administration of zoledronic acid and strontium-89 decreased her VAS pain score from 7–8 to 3–4. Radiotherapy and nerve decompression and release were ineffective, as was osteoplasty because of the location error. The epidural infusion system decreased the VAS score from 7–8 to 2–3 and was highly efficient. Conclusions Multidisciplinary integrated treatment for metastatic cancer can be effective.