Loading…
The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes
Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Societies (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | Societies (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Hussels, Jonathan Richter, Ralph Schmidt, Suntje |
description | Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/soc14070122 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3085021500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVtLw0AQhYMoWGqf_AMBHyU6e83mSUq9BQqK1r4uk81GU9Js3U0K_ntTW6TzcmaGw3cGJoouCdwwlsFtcIZwSIFQehKNKKQi4TJTp0f9eTQJYQVDKSklSUfRcvFl43y9QdPFrorv6xBci62xd_E0XmLTY1e7Nn61Pmys6eqtjYfxrffYxO_O1IPkbeu2B5t3xoZgw0V0VmET7OSg4-jj8WExe07mL0_5bDpPDBW0S3hlGPIsFbwwvMAqQyYqIGXBMaWESCgLkylIZSZlqbiytLSMQ5lJIqhEYOMo33NLhyu98fUa_Y92WOu_hfOfGn1Xm8ZqTgRTakACY7xiqTKEIlpghBRWGDOwrvasjXffvQ2dXrnet8P5moESQImAXeL13mW8C8Hb6j-VgN79QR_9gf0Cdsx4sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085021500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><description>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4698</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/soc14070122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Case studies ; Decision making ; dissonance ; impact ; Innovations ; Regional development ; Regional planning ; Rural areas ; Social accounting ; Social impact ; Social innovation ; Social processes ; Sociology ; Valuation ; value ; Value creation</subject><ispartof>Societies (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4680-5387 ; 0000-0002-9039-6429 ; 0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085021500/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085021500?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,25731,27321,27843,27901,27902,33588,33751,36989,38493,43709,43871,44566,73964,74155,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><title>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>dissonance</subject><subject>impact</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social accounting</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Social innovation</subject><subject>Social processes</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>value</subject><subject>Value creation</subject><issn>2075-4698</issn><issn>2075-4698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkVtLw0AQhYMoWGqf_AMBHyU6e83mSUq9BQqK1r4uk81GU9Js3U0K_ntTW6TzcmaGw3cGJoouCdwwlsFtcIZwSIFQehKNKKQi4TJTp0f9eTQJYQVDKSklSUfRcvFl43y9QdPFrorv6xBci62xd_E0XmLTY1e7Nn61Pmys6eqtjYfxrffYxO_O1IPkbeu2B5t3xoZgw0V0VmET7OSg4-jj8WExe07mL0_5bDpPDBW0S3hlGPIsFbwwvMAqQyYqIGXBMaWESCgLkylIZSZlqbiytLSMQ5lJIqhEYOMo33NLhyu98fUa_Y92WOu_hfOfGn1Xm8ZqTgRTakACY7xiqTKEIlpghBRWGDOwrvasjXffvQ2dXrnet8P5moESQImAXeL13mW8C8Hb6j-VgN79QR_9gf0Cdsx4sw</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Hussels, Jonathan</creator><creator>Richter, Ralph</creator><creator>Schmidt, Suntje</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><author>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>dissonance</topic><topic>impact</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social accounting</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Social innovation</topic><topic>Social processes</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>value</topic><topic>Value creation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussels, Jonathan</au><au>Richter, Ralph</au><au>Schmidt, Suntje</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</atitle><jtitle>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>122</spage><pages>122-</pages><issn>2075-4698</issn><eissn>2075-4698</eissn><abstract>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/soc14070122</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4698 |
ispartof | Societies (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122 |
issn | 2075-4698 2075-4698 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Assessments Case studies Decision making dissonance impact Innovations Regional development Regional planning Rural areas Social accounting Social impact Social innovation Social processes Sociology Valuation value Value creation |
title | The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A00%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Dissonance?%20A%20Valuation%20Perspective%20on%20Rural%20Social%20Innovation%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Societies%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Hussels,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=122&rft.pages=122-&rft.issn=2075-4698&rft.eissn=2075-4698&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/soc14070122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3085021500%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085021500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |