Loading…

The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes

Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Societies (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122
Main Authors: Hussels, Jonathan, Richter, Ralph, Schmidt, Suntje
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 122
container_title Societies (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 14
creator Hussels, Jonathan
Richter, Ralph
Schmidt, Suntje
description Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/soc14070122
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3085021500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVtLw0AQhYMoWGqf_AMBHyU6e83mSUq9BQqK1r4uk81GU9Js3U0K_ntTW6TzcmaGw3cGJoouCdwwlsFtcIZwSIFQehKNKKQi4TJTp0f9eTQJYQVDKSklSUfRcvFl43y9QdPFrorv6xBci62xd_E0XmLTY1e7Nn61Pmys6eqtjYfxrffYxO_O1IPkbeu2B5t3xoZgw0V0VmET7OSg4-jj8WExe07mL0_5bDpPDBW0S3hlGPIsFbwwvMAqQyYqIGXBMaWESCgLkylIZSZlqbiytLSMQ5lJIqhEYOMo33NLhyu98fUa_Y92WOu_hfOfGn1Xm8ZqTgRTakACY7xiqTKEIlpghBRWGDOwrvasjXffvQ2dXrnet8P5moESQImAXeL13mW8C8Hb6j-VgN79QR_9gf0Cdsx4sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085021500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><description>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4698</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/soc14070122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Case studies ; Decision making ; dissonance ; impact ; Innovations ; Regional development ; Regional planning ; Rural areas ; Social accounting ; Social impact ; Social innovation ; Social processes ; Sociology ; Valuation ; value ; Value creation</subject><ispartof>Societies (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4680-5387 ; 0000-0002-9039-6429 ; 0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085021500/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3085021500?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,25731,27321,27843,27901,27902,33588,33751,36989,38493,43709,43871,44566,73964,74155,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><title>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>dissonance</subject><subject>impact</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social accounting</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Social innovation</subject><subject>Social processes</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>value</subject><subject>Value creation</subject><issn>2075-4698</issn><issn>2075-4698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkVtLw0AQhYMoWGqf_AMBHyU6e83mSUq9BQqK1r4uk81GU9Js3U0K_ntTW6TzcmaGw3cGJoouCdwwlsFtcIZwSIFQehKNKKQi4TJTp0f9eTQJYQVDKSklSUfRcvFl43y9QdPFrorv6xBci62xd_E0XmLTY1e7Nn61Pmys6eqtjYfxrffYxO_O1IPkbeu2B5t3xoZgw0V0VmET7OSg4-jj8WExe07mL0_5bDpPDBW0S3hlGPIsFbwwvMAqQyYqIGXBMaWESCgLkylIZSZlqbiytLSMQ5lJIqhEYOMo33NLhyu98fUa_Y92WOu_hfOfGn1Xm8ZqTgRTakACY7xiqTKEIlpghBRWGDOwrvasjXffvQ2dXrnet8P5moESQImAXeL13mW8C8Hb6j-VgN79QR_9gf0Cdsx4sw</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Hussels, Jonathan</creator><creator>Richter, Ralph</creator><creator>Schmidt, Suntje</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</title><author>Hussels, Jonathan ; Richter, Ralph ; Schmidt, Suntje</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>dissonance</topic><topic>impact</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social accounting</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Social innovation</topic><topic>Social processes</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>value</topic><topic>Value creation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussels, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Suntje</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussels, Jonathan</au><au>Richter, Ralph</au><au>Schmidt, Suntje</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes</atitle><jtitle>Societies (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>122</spage><pages>122-</pages><issn>2075-4698</issn><eissn>2075-4698</eissn><abstract>Social innovation (SI) has been credited with fostering novel solutions to the socio-economic challenges many rural areas face. The quest for a substantiated understanding of its potential for regional development has spawned a rich literature on SI impact assessments. Yet, having been instrumental, these assessments harbour several ambiguities as they seek to unveil objective impacts in a results-oriented manner. First, SI processes take diverse directionalities, questioning the idea of them being ‘straightforward facts’ and giving leeway to a more constructivist understanding. Second, a results-oriented perspective tends to obscure social processes that initially contribute to the emergence of impacts. In response to such concerns, we suggest a valuation perspective that explores how SI impacts are constructed iteratively throughout the innovation process. To do so, we operationalise the notion of dissonance as a critical factor embedded in innovative activities in three instances: impulses, turning points, and lock-ins. This perspective allows us to study how value is experienced, assigned, and strategically attracted while shedding light on how SI processes and their impacts are co-constructed in valuation processes. The article uses empirical vignettes from selected case studies with SI initiatives in Northern Germany.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/soc14070122</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5387</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4520-5834</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4698
ispartof Societies (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-07, Vol.14 (7), p.122
issn 2075-4698
2075-4698
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_41538860d0334f378c12aae0311be5cc
source Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Assessments
Case studies
Decision making
dissonance
impact
Innovations
Regional development
Regional planning
Rural areas
Social accounting
Social impact
Social innovation
Social processes
Sociology
Valuation
value
Value creation
title The Impact of Dissonance? A Valuation Perspective on Rural Social Innovation Processes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A00%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Dissonance?%20A%20Valuation%20Perspective%20on%20Rural%20Social%20Innovation%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Societies%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Hussels,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=122&rft.pages=122-&rft.issn=2075-4698&rft.eissn=2075-4698&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/soc14070122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3085021500%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-4fc3a49754bc4baf9a35f01db4a721160dbc98076966d848e2de340d961526a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085021500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true