Assessing the quality of cardiac rehabilitation programs by measuring adherence to the Australian quality indicators

• Published in: BMC health services research 2022-02, Vol.22 (1), p.267-267, Article 267
• Main Authors: Astley, C M, Beleigoli, A, Tavella, R, Hendriks, J, Gallagher, C, Tirimacco, R, Wilson, G, Barry, T, Clark, R A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accreditation; Acute coronary syndromes; Australia; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Care and treatment; Coronary Disease; Coronary heart disease; Heart diseases; Humans; Medical care; Quality improvement; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Quality management; Quality of Life
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07667-2

Every year, over 65,000 Australians experience an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and around one-third occur in people with prior coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) aims to prevent a repeat ACS by supporting patients' return to an active and fulfilling lifestyle. CR programs are efficacious, but audits of clinical practice show variability of program delivery, which may compromise patient outcomes. Core components, quality indicators and accreditation of programs have been introduced internationally to increase program standardisation. With Australian quality indicators (QIs) for cardiac rehabilitation recently introduced, we aimed to conduct a survey in one state of Australia to assess the extent to which programs adhere to the measurement of QIs comparing country, metropolitan, telephone and face to face programs. A cross- sectional survey design with face validity testing was used to formulate questions to evaluate cardiac rehabilitation program and personnel characteristics and QI adherence. Between October 2020- December 2021, 23 cardiac rehabilitation programs across country and metropolitan areas were invited to participate. Quality improvement was defined as adherence to the Australian Quality Indicators, and we developed an objective score to calculate program performance categorised by quartiles. Significance of CR completion and time to enrolment between program type (telephone versus face to face) and location (country versus metropolitan were compared using Pearson's Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. Among the 23 CR programs, 15 were country and 8 metropolitan-based and 22 were face to face and 1 telephone-based. Median wait time from discharge was 27.0 days, (interquartile range 19.3-46.0) across all programs and country completions of enrolled were 76.9% versus metropolitan 56.5%, p