Loading…

Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding

Continuing with previous research by our group in an ESF system, four types of enrichment treatments were assessed in gestating sows housed in Free Access Stalls: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals (Basel) 2022-07, Vol.12 (14), p.1768
Main Authors: Roy, Cyril, Kyeiwaa, Victoria, Mancera, Karen F., Seddon, Yolande M., Connor, Laurie M., Brown, Jennifer A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a0a2ad106998156b430f4f931952f637a09b061cdb1c5897dba36fabbc6e44d73
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1768
container_title Animals (Basel)
container_volume 12
creator Roy, Cyril
Kyeiwaa, Victoria
Mancera, Karen F.
Seddon, Yolande M.
Connor, Laurie M.
Brown, Jennifer A.
description Continuing with previous research by our group in an ESF system, four types of enrichment treatments were assessed in gestating sows housed in Free Access Stalls: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments with an acoustic cue; and (4) Control: no enrichment. Treatments had a 12 day-duration. Four groups (28 ± 2 sows) were studied from weeks 6 to 14 of gestation. Groups received all treatments in random order. Three dominant and 3 subordinates per pen were selected using a feed competition test. Digital photos were collected at 10 min intervals for 8 h on days 1, 8, 10 and 12 to record interactions with enrichment. Skin lesions were assessed on days 1 and 12, and salivary cortisol was assessed in weeks 6, 10 and 14 of gestation. More enrichment use was observed in Rotate and Stimulus treatments compared to Constant, and more sows contacted enrichment when straw was provided in the Rotate and Stimulus treatments. There was no difference in the amount of enrichment use by dominants and subordinates, no cortisol concentration elevation in subordinate sows nor any difference in lesion scores. In conclusion, social status had little impact and feeding system is important to reduce stress and aggression.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ani12141768
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_42f61b4df2d443af9554e318bb269e3e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_42f61b4df2d443af9554e318bb269e3e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2693862608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a0a2ad106998156b430f4f931952f637a09b061cdb1c5897dba36fabbc6e44d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1uEzEQgFcIRKvSEy9giQsSBPy_aw5IbZVApUpUSnu2bO84cbSxg70p6o0Lb8AT8iQ4TYVSfLE9_ubzaDRN85rgD4wp_NHEQCjhpJXds-aY4lZOqCTi-cH5qDktZYXragUjgrxsjpjoOsYIP25-Tb0HNxaUPJrGHNxyDXFEN_cbeI-uM5R6M2NIEZnYo3lywQxoXkPbmhIPU24LPDDnsDR3IeWdcZ5-lD8_f1-bPCL6Cc0yADpzDkrZOYYBzQD6EBevmhfeDAVOH_eT5nY2vbn4Orn69uXy4uxq4jjB48RgQ01PsFSqI0JazrDnXjGiBPWStQYriyVxvSVOdKrtrWHSG2udBM77lp00l3tvn8xKb3JYm3yvkwn6IZDyQtdSgxtA82oklvee9pwz45UQHBjprKVSAYPq-rx3bbZ2Db2rPchmeCJ9-hLDUi_Sna71EsVZFbx9FOT0fQtl1OtQHAyDiZC2Rdd_BFVMUFzRN_-hq7TNsbZqR7FOUom7Sr3bUy6nUjL4f8UQrHfTog-mhf0FjFuxKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2693862608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Roy, Cyril ; Kyeiwaa, Victoria ; Mancera, Karen F. ; Seddon, Yolande M. ; Connor, Laurie M. ; Brown, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roy, Cyril ; Kyeiwaa, Victoria ; Mancera, Karen F. ; Seddon, Yolande M. ; Connor, Laurie M. ; Brown, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Continuing with previous research by our group in an ESF system, four types of enrichment treatments were assessed in gestating sows housed in Free Access Stalls: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments with an acoustic cue; and (4) Control: no enrichment. Treatments had a 12 day-duration. Four groups (28 ± 2 sows) were studied from weeks 6 to 14 of gestation. Groups received all treatments in random order. Three dominant and 3 subordinates per pen were selected using a feed competition test. Digital photos were collected at 10 min intervals for 8 h on days 1, 8, 10 and 12 to record interactions with enrichment. Skin lesions were assessed on days 1 and 12, and salivary cortisol was assessed in weeks 6, 10 and 14 of gestation. More enrichment use was observed in Rotate and Stimulus treatments compared to Constant, and more sows contacted enrichment when straw was provided in the Rotate and Stimulus treatments. There was no difference in the amount of enrichment use by dominants and subordinates, no cortisol concentration elevation in subordinate sows nor any difference in lesion scores. In conclusion, social status had little impact and feeding system is important to reduce stress and aggression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ani12141768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35883314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Aggressive behavior ; Chains ; Codes of Practice ; Enrichment ; environmental enrichment ; Feeds ; Flooring ; Gestation ; habituation ; Hogs ; Lesions ; Pork ; Risk management ; Rope ; Rotation ; Skin diseases ; Skin lesions ; Social interactions ; social status ; sows ; Straw ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Animals (Basel), 2022-07, Vol.12 (14), p.1768</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a0a2ad106998156b430f4f931952f637a09b061cdb1c5897dba36fabbc6e44d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8888-3570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2693862608/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2693862608?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roy, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyeiwaa, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancera, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddon, Yolande M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Laurie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding</title><title>Animals (Basel)</title><description>Continuing with previous research by our group in an ESF system, four types of enrichment treatments were assessed in gestating sows housed in Free Access Stalls: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments with an acoustic cue; and (4) Control: no enrichment. Treatments had a 12 day-duration. Four groups (28 ± 2 sows) were studied from weeks 6 to 14 of gestation. Groups received all treatments in random order. Three dominant and 3 subordinates per pen were selected using a feed competition test. Digital photos were collected at 10 min intervals for 8 h on days 1, 8, 10 and 12 to record interactions with enrichment. Skin lesions were assessed on days 1 and 12, and salivary cortisol was assessed in weeks 6, 10 and 14 of gestation. More enrichment use was observed in Rotate and Stimulus treatments compared to Constant, and more sows contacted enrichment when straw was provided in the Rotate and Stimulus treatments. There was no difference in the amount of enrichment use by dominants and subordinates, no cortisol concentration elevation in subordinate sows nor any difference in lesion scores. In conclusion, social status had little impact and feeding system is important to reduce stress and aggression.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Aggressive behavior</subject><subject>Chains</subject><subject>Codes of Practice</subject><subject>Enrichment</subject><subject>environmental enrichment</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>habituation</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Rope</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Skin lesions</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>social status</subject><subject>sows</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>2076-2615</issn><issn>2076-2615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1uEzEQgFcIRKvSEy9giQsSBPy_aw5IbZVApUpUSnu2bO84cbSxg70p6o0Lb8AT8iQ4TYVSfLE9_ubzaDRN85rgD4wp_NHEQCjhpJXds-aY4lZOqCTi-cH5qDktZYXragUjgrxsjpjoOsYIP25-Tb0HNxaUPJrGHNxyDXFEN_cbeI-uM5R6M2NIEZnYo3lywQxoXkPbmhIPU24LPDDnsDR3IeWdcZ5-lD8_f1-bPCL6Cc0yADpzDkrZOYYBzQD6EBevmhfeDAVOH_eT5nY2vbn4Orn69uXy4uxq4jjB48RgQ01PsFSqI0JazrDnXjGiBPWStQYriyVxvSVOdKrtrWHSG2udBM77lp00l3tvn8xKb3JYm3yvkwn6IZDyQtdSgxtA82oklvee9pwz45UQHBjprKVSAYPq-rx3bbZ2Db2rPchmeCJ9-hLDUi_Sna71EsVZFbx9FOT0fQtl1OtQHAyDiZC2Rdd_BFVMUFzRN_-hq7TNsbZqR7FOUom7Sr3bUy6nUjL4f8UQrHfTog-mhf0FjFuxKQ</recordid><startdate>20220710</startdate><enddate>20220710</enddate><creator>Roy, Cyril</creator><creator>Kyeiwaa, Victoria</creator><creator>Mancera, Karen F.</creator><creator>Seddon, Yolande M.</creator><creator>Connor, Laurie M.</creator><creator>Brown, Jennifer A.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-3570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220710</creationdate><title>Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding</title><author>Roy, Cyril ; Kyeiwaa, Victoria ; Mancera, Karen F. ; Seddon, Yolande M. ; Connor, Laurie M. ; Brown, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a0a2ad106998156b430f4f931952f637a09b061cdb1c5897dba36fabbc6e44d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Aggressive behavior</topic><topic>Chains</topic><topic>Codes of Practice</topic><topic>Enrichment</topic><topic>environmental enrichment</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>habituation</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Rope</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Skin lesions</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>social status</topic><topic>sows</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roy, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyeiwaa, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancera, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seddon, Yolande M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Laurie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roy, Cyril</au><au>Kyeiwaa, Victoria</au><au>Mancera, Karen F.</au><au>Seddon, Yolande M.</au><au>Connor, Laurie M.</au><au>Brown, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding</atitle><jtitle>Animals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-07-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1768</spage><pages>1768-</pages><issn>2076-2615</issn><eissn>2076-2615</eissn><abstract>Continuing with previous research by our group in an ESF system, four types of enrichment treatments were assessed in gestating sows housed in Free Access Stalls: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments with an acoustic cue; and (4) Control: no enrichment. Treatments had a 12 day-duration. Four groups (28 ± 2 sows) were studied from weeks 6 to 14 of gestation. Groups received all treatments in random order. Three dominant and 3 subordinates per pen were selected using a feed competition test. Digital photos were collected at 10 min intervals for 8 h on days 1, 8, 10 and 12 to record interactions with enrichment. Skin lesions were assessed on days 1 and 12, and salivary cortisol was assessed in weeks 6, 10 and 14 of gestation. More enrichment use was observed in Rotate and Stimulus treatments compared to Constant, and more sows contacted enrichment when straw was provided in the Rotate and Stimulus treatments. There was no difference in the amount of enrichment use by dominants and subordinates, no cortisol concentration elevation in subordinate sows nor any difference in lesion scores. In conclusion, social status had little impact and feeding system is important to reduce stress and aggression.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35883314</pmid><doi>10.3390/ani12141768</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-3570</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-2615
ispartof Animals (Basel), 2022-07, Vol.12 (14), p.1768
issn 2076-2615
2076-2615
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_42f61b4df2d443af9554e318bb269e3e
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Aggression
Aggressive behavior
Chains
Codes of Practice
Enrichment
environmental enrichment
Feeds
Flooring
Gestation
habituation
Hogs
Lesions
Pork
Risk management
Rope
Rotation
Skin diseases
Skin lesions
Social interactions
social status
sows
Straw
Swine
title Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behavior of Sows—Part 2: Free Access Stall Feeding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Enrichment%20Type,%20Presentation%20and%20Social%20Status%20on%20Enrichment%20Use%20and%20Behavior%20of%20Sows%E2%80%94Part%202:%20Free%20Access%20Stall%20Feeding&rft.jtitle=Animals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Roy,%20Cyril&rft.date=2022-07-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1768&rft.pages=1768-&rft.issn=2076-2615&rft.eissn=2076-2615&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ani12141768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2693862608%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-a0a2ad106998156b430f4f931952f637a09b061cdb1c5897dba36fabbc6e44d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2693862608&rft_id=info:pmid/35883314&rfr_iscdi=true