Loading…
Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations
The aim of this study was to develop a scale to investigate the ways of coping with interpersonal situations considered difficult in the Brazilian university context. The items were based on the results of a study previously obtained in a focus group with university students. The first steps of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psicologia, reflexão e crítica reflexão e crítica, 2018-09, Vol.31 (1), p.24-24, Article 24 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853 |
container_end_page | 24 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Psicologia, reflexão e crítica |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Soares, Adriana Benevides Mourão, Luciana Maia, Fátima Almeida Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri Monteiro, Marcia Cristina de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza |
description | The aim of this study was to develop a scale to investigate the ways of coping with interpersonal situations considered difficult in the Brazilian university context. The items were based on the results of a study previously obtained in a focus group with university students. The first steps of the study were the analysis of judges and the investigation of the semantic validity. After these steps, a total of 1366 (female = 74.9%) students from public and private institutions participated in the study. The study followed the steps design of the items, development of the first version of the instrument, and initial tests of validity (content validity and internal consistency). The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated the maintenance of 26 items, distributed in four factors: focus on emotion (
α
= 0.73), focus on social support (
α
= 0.81), focus on religious coping (
α
= 0.83), and focus on the problem (
α
= 0.70). The final scale solution was considered satisfactory for the proposed instrument, with consistency for the application in other studies and investigations that evaluate the coping strategies of students in situations considered difficult in the university. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s41155-018-0103-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_437824072d994ccc864a88642afd077e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_79722018000103108</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_437824072d994ccc864a88642afd077e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2670517692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk2LFDEQbURxx9Uf4EUCXrz0mqQ7XxdBBj8WFjy495CupGcz9CRjkp5l_71pZxxdwUMSqHrvVb1KNc1rgq8Ikfx97glhrMVE1oO7lj5pVoQL2QrCuqfNqgZpK5SgF82LnLcYU9GJ7nlz0VFMOSFq1ezXMeSSZig-BmSCRQczeevLA3IHb10Ah-KIDMpgJofGmBDEvQ8bdO_LHbJ-HD3MU0E5gjcTMmCs23lAPhSX9i7lGGo4-zKbpUR-2TwbzZTdq9N72dx-_nS7_trefPtyvf540wInfWktZSNWohsJo72SrpdjLwgxxrKByUEKbrAEwQgMrhsGQ5VjALgClQTJusvm-ihro9nqffI7kx50NF7_CsS00SYVD5PTfSck7bGgVqkeACTvjawXNaPFQriqdXXUyuDdFPU2zqmayvr7MmC9DJjWP8B4-QSCZSV8OBL287BzFlwoyUyPunicCf5Ob-JBc8V5FasC704CKf6YXS565zO4aTLBxTlr2jGKGSVCVejbf6Dn9igXmBHB1SJIjihIMefkxnMzBOtll_Rxl3T1oRcbeuG8-dvFmfF7eSqAnuZSU2Hj0p_S_1f9CTeb0wA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670517692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><source>SciELO Brazil</source><creator>Soares, Adriana Benevides ; Mourão, Luciana ; Maia, Fátima Almeida ; Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri ; Monteiro, Marcia Cristina ; de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta ; Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Adriana Benevides ; Mourão, Luciana ; Maia, Fátima Almeida ; Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri ; Monteiro, Marcia Cristina ; de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta ; Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to develop a scale to investigate the ways of coping with interpersonal situations considered difficult in the Brazilian university context. The items were based on the results of a study previously obtained in a focus group with university students. The first steps of the study were the analysis of judges and the investigation of the semantic validity. After these steps, a total of 1366 (female = 74.9%) students from public and private institutions participated in the study. The study followed the steps design of the items, development of the first version of the instrument, and initial tests of validity (content validity and internal consistency). The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated the maintenance of 26 items, distributed in four factors: focus on emotion (
α
= 0.73), focus on social support (
α
= 0.81), focus on religious coping (
α
= 0.83), and focus on the problem (
α
= 0.70). The final scale solution was considered satisfactory for the proposed instrument, with consistency for the application in other studies and investigations that evaluate the coping strategies of students in situations considered difficult in the university.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-7972</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-7153</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s41155-018-0103-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32026119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological Psychology ; Coping ; Developmental Psychology ; Factor analysis ; Health Psychology ; PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ; Psychological assessment ; Psychological evaluation ; Psychological Methods/Evaluation ; Psychology ; Psychology Research ; Psychometrics ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Psicologia, reflexão e crítica, 2018-09, Vol.31 (1), p.24-24, Article 24</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3455-2690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670517692/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670517692?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,24129,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026119$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Adriana Benevides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Luciana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Fátima Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Marcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</creatorcontrib><title>Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations</title><title>Psicologia, reflexão e crítica</title><addtitle>Psicol. Refl. Crít</addtitle><addtitle>Psicol Reflex Crit</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to develop a scale to investigate the ways of coping with interpersonal situations considered difficult in the Brazilian university context. The items were based on the results of a study previously obtained in a focus group with university students. The first steps of the study were the analysis of judges and the investigation of the semantic validity. After these steps, a total of 1366 (female = 74.9%) students from public and private institutions participated in the study. The study followed the steps design of the items, development of the first version of the instrument, and initial tests of validity (content validity and internal consistency). The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated the maintenance of 26 items, distributed in four factors: focus on emotion (
α
= 0.73), focus on social support (
α
= 0.81), focus on religious coping (
α
= 0.83), and focus on the problem (
α
= 0.70). The final scale solution was considered satisfactory for the proposed instrument, with consistency for the application in other studies and investigations that evaluate the coping strategies of students in situations considered difficult in the university.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological Psychology</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Developmental Psychology</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Psychological evaluation</subject><subject>Psychological Methods/Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0102-7972</issn><issn>1678-7153</issn><issn>1678-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk2LFDEQbURxx9Uf4EUCXrz0mqQ7XxdBBj8WFjy495CupGcz9CRjkp5l_71pZxxdwUMSqHrvVb1KNc1rgq8Ikfx97glhrMVE1oO7lj5pVoQL2QrCuqfNqgZpK5SgF82LnLcYU9GJ7nlz0VFMOSFq1ezXMeSSZig-BmSCRQczeevLA3IHb10Ah-KIDMpgJofGmBDEvQ8bdO_LHbJ-HD3MU0E5gjcTMmCs23lAPhSX9i7lGGo4-zKbpUR-2TwbzZTdq9N72dx-_nS7_trefPtyvf540wInfWktZSNWohsJo72SrpdjLwgxxrKByUEKbrAEwQgMrhsGQ5VjALgClQTJusvm-ihro9nqffI7kx50NF7_CsS00SYVD5PTfSck7bGgVqkeACTvjawXNaPFQriqdXXUyuDdFPU2zqmayvr7MmC9DJjWP8B4-QSCZSV8OBL287BzFlwoyUyPunicCf5Ob-JBc8V5FasC704CKf6YXS565zO4aTLBxTlr2jGKGSVCVejbf6Dn9igXmBHB1SJIjihIMefkxnMzBOtll_Rxl3T1oRcbeuG8-dvFmfF7eSqAnuZSU2Hj0p_S_1f9CTeb0wA</recordid><startdate>20180903</startdate><enddate>20180903</enddate><creator>Soares, Adriana Benevides</creator><creator>Mourão, Luciana</creator><creator>Maia, Fátima Almeida</creator><creator>Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri</creator><creator>Monteiro, Marcia Cristina</creator><creator>de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-2690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180903</creationdate><title>Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations</title><author>Soares, Adriana Benevides ; Mourão, Luciana ; Maia, Fátima Almeida ; Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri ; Monteiro, Marcia Cristina ; de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta ; Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological Psychology</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Developmental Psychology</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Psychological evaluation</topic><topic>Psychological Methods/Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Adriana Benevides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Luciana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Fátima Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Marcia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Psicologia, reflexão e crítica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Adriana Benevides</au><au>Mourão, Luciana</au><au>Maia, Fátima Almeida</au><au>Medeiros, Humberto Claudio Passeri</au><au>Monteiro, Marcia Cristina</au><au>de Souza Nogueira Barros, Roberta</au><au>Rodrigues, Pedro Vítor Souza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations</atitle><jtitle>Psicologia, reflexão e crítica</jtitle><stitle>Psicol. Refl. Crít</stitle><addtitle>Psicol Reflex Crit</addtitle><date>2018-09-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>24-24</pages><artnum>24</artnum><issn>0102-7972</issn><issn>1678-7153</issn><eissn>1678-7153</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to develop a scale to investigate the ways of coping with interpersonal situations considered difficult in the Brazilian university context. The items were based on the results of a study previously obtained in a focus group with university students. The first steps of the study were the analysis of judges and the investigation of the semantic validity. After these steps, a total of 1366 (female = 74.9%) students from public and private institutions participated in the study. The study followed the steps design of the items, development of the first version of the instrument, and initial tests of validity (content validity and internal consistency). The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated the maintenance of 26 items, distributed in four factors: focus on emotion (
α
= 0.73), focus on social support (
α
= 0.81), focus on religious coping (
α
= 0.83), and focus on the problem (
α
= 0.70). The final scale solution was considered satisfactory for the proposed instrument, with consistency for the application in other studies and investigations that evaluate the coping strategies of students in situations considered difficult in the university.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32026119</pmid><doi>10.1186/s41155-018-0103-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-2690</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0102-7972 |
ispartof | Psicologia, reflexão e crítica, 2018-09, Vol.31 (1), p.24-24, Article 24 |
issn | 0102-7972 1678-7153 1678-7153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_437824072d994ccc864a88642afd077e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (Open access); SciELO Brazil |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological Psychology Coping Developmental Psychology Factor analysis Health Psychology PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological assessment Psychological evaluation Psychological Methods/Evaluation Psychology Psychology Research Psychometrics Validity |
title | Construction and validity evidence of a scale for coping with difficult social academic interpersonal situations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20and%20validity%20evidence%20of%20a%20scale%20for%20coping%20with%20difficult%20social%20academic%20interpersonal%20situations&rft.jtitle=Psicologia,%20reflexa%CC%83o%20e%20cri%CC%81tica&rft.au=Soares,%20Adriana%20Benevides&rft.date=2018-09-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=24-24&rft.artnum=24&rft.issn=0102-7972&rft.eissn=1678-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s41155-018-0103-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2670517692%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-d25f0973f152498e48f4711aad5b58b876a08c751cbe3bba29e5cc08e498c853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670517692&rft_id=info:pmid/32026119&rft_scielo_id=S0102_79722018000103108&rfr_iscdi=true |