Loading…

Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making

Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. In this multi-national, cross-se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient preference and adherence 2020-01, Vol.14, p.119-131
Main Authors: Taylor, Peter C, Betteridge, Neil, Brown, T Michelle, Woolcott, John, Kivitz, Alan J, Zerbini, Cristiano, Whalley, Diane, Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe, Chen, Connie, Dahl, Palle, Ponce de Leon, Dario, Gruben, David, Fallon, Lara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-b295975e9267b39cd88638793941cd0e51a5e44f9b68a46dcad704543b2117963
cites
container_end_page 131
container_issue
container_start_page 119
container_title Patient preference and adherence
container_volume 14
creator Taylor, Peter C
Betteridge, Neil
Brown, T Michelle
Woolcott, John
Kivitz, Alan J
Zerbini, Cristiano
Whalley, Diane
Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe
Chen, Connie
Dahl, Palle
Ponce de Leon, Dario
Gruben, David
Fallon, Lara
description Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. In this multi-national, cross-sectional, qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with adult patients with RA in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Patients' strength of preference was evaluated using a 100-point allocation task (0-100; 100=strongest) across four treatment modes: oral, self-injection, clinic-injection, and infusion. Qualitative descriptive analysis methods were used to identify, characterize, and summarize patterns found in the interview data relating to reasons for these preferences. 100 patients were interviewed (female, 75.0%; mean age, 53.9 years; mean 11.6 years since diagnosis). Among the four treatment modes, oral administration was allocated the highest mean (standard deviation) preference points (47.3 [33.1]) and was ranked first choice by the greatest percentage of patients (57.0%), followed by self-injection (29.7 [27.7]; 29.0%), infusion (15.4 [24.6]; 16.0%), and clinic-injection (7.5 [14.1]; 2.0%). Overall, 56.0% of patients had a "strong" first-choice preference (ie, point allocation ≥70); most of these patients chose oral (62.5%) vs self-injection (23.2%), infusion (10.7%), or clinic-injection (3.6%). Speed and/or ease of administration were the most commonly reported reasons for patients choosing oral (52.6%) or self-injection (55.2%). The most common reasons for patients not choosing oral or self-injection were not wanting to take another pill (37.2%) and avoiding pain due to needles (46.5%), respectively. These data report factors important to patients regarding preferences for RA treatment modes. Patients may benefit from discussions with their healthcare professionals and/or patient support groups, regarding RA treatment modes, to facilitate shared decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/PPA.S220714
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43b0f3bcd13845bb99654c889ec7e055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622161184</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43b0f3bcd13845bb99654c889ec7e055</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A622161184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-b295975e9267b39cd88638793941cd0e51a5e44f9b68a46dcad704543b2117963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxQdRbK0--S4Dggiya74z8UFY6lehxcWu0LeQSe7spM5MajJT8b836651VyQPCTe_e8I9OUXxFKM5wUy-Xi4X80tCkMTsXnGMsZSzqlJX9_fOR8WjlK4RElQQ_LA4ogQRjAk9Lq5WEczYwzCWF8FBuYzQQITBQir9UH5pYerNGLwrF3Fsox99epPJWz-sy1X4YaIrL1sTwZXvwPrkwzC7MN_y7ePiQWO6BE92-0nx9cP71emn2fnnj2eni_OZFZiPs5ooriQHRYSsqbKuqgStpKKKYesQcGw4MNaoWlSGCWeNk4hxRus8gFSCnhRnW10XzLW-ib438acOxuvfhRDX2sTR2w50bkINra3DtGK8rpUSnNnsD1gJiPOs9XardTPVPTibXYmmOxA9vBl8q9fhVgtVoYrhLPByJxDD9wnSqHufLHSdGSBMSRPKMauk4Cijz_9Br8MUh2zVhhKUYknpX2pt8gB-aEJ-125E9UIQggXGFcvU_D9UXg56b8MAjc_1g4YXew0tmG5sU-imMf9fOgRfbUEbQ0o5G3dmYKQ36dM5fXqXvkw_2_fvjv0TN_oLA_nRMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2356331733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Taylor, Peter C ; Betteridge, Neil ; Brown, T Michelle ; Woolcott, John ; Kivitz, Alan J ; Zerbini, Cristiano ; Whalley, Diane ; Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe ; Chen, Connie ; Dahl, Palle ; Ponce de Leon, Dario ; Gruben, David ; Fallon, Lara</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peter C ; Betteridge, Neil ; Brown, T Michelle ; Woolcott, John ; Kivitz, Alan J ; Zerbini, Cristiano ; Whalley, Diane ; Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe ; Chen, Connie ; Dahl, Palle ; Ponce de Leon, Dario ; Gruben, David ; Fallon, Lara</creatorcontrib><description>Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. In this multi-national, cross-sectional, qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with adult patients with RA in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Patients' strength of preference was evaluated using a 100-point allocation task (0-100; 100=strongest) across four treatment modes: oral, self-injection, clinic-injection, and infusion. Qualitative descriptive analysis methods were used to identify, characterize, and summarize patterns found in the interview data relating to reasons for these preferences. 100 patients were interviewed (female, 75.0%; mean age, 53.9 years; mean 11.6 years since diagnosis). Among the four treatment modes, oral administration was allocated the highest mean (standard deviation) preference points (47.3 [33.1]) and was ranked first choice by the greatest percentage of patients (57.0%), followed by self-injection (29.7 [27.7]; 29.0%), infusion (15.4 [24.6]; 16.0%), and clinic-injection (7.5 [14.1]; 2.0%). Overall, 56.0% of patients had a "strong" first-choice preference (ie, point allocation ≥70); most of these patients chose oral (62.5%) vs self-injection (23.2%), infusion (10.7%), or clinic-injection (3.6%). Speed and/or ease of administration were the most commonly reported reasons for patients choosing oral (52.6%) or self-injection (55.2%). The most common reasons for patients not choosing oral or self-injection were not wanting to take another pill (37.2%) and avoiding pain due to needles (46.5%), respectively. These data report factors important to patients regarding preferences for RA treatment modes. Patients may benefit from discussions with their healthcare professionals and/or patient support groups, regarding RA treatment modes, to facilitate shared decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S220714</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32021123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Antiarthritic agents ; Antirheumatic agents ; Arthritis ; Baricitinib ; Care and treatment ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; drug administration ; Hypothesis testing ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Original Research ; Pain ; patient perspective ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physicians ; Preferences ; Qualitative research ; Quality of life ; Rankings ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatoid factor ; surveys ; Tofacitinib</subject><ispartof>Patient preference and adherence, 2020-01, Vol.14, p.119-131</ispartof><rights>2020 Taylor et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Taylor et al. 2020 Taylor et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-b295975e9267b39cd88638793941cd0e51a5e44f9b68a46dcad704543b2117963</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3516-5289 ; 0000-0001-7766-6167</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2356331733/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2356331733?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betteridge, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, T Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolcott, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbini, Cristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Connie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Palle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce de Leon, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruben, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallon, Lara</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making</title><title>Patient preference and adherence</title><addtitle>Patient Prefer Adherence</addtitle><description>Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. In this multi-national, cross-sectional, qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with adult patients with RA in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Patients' strength of preference was evaluated using a 100-point allocation task (0-100; 100=strongest) across four treatment modes: oral, self-injection, clinic-injection, and infusion. Qualitative descriptive analysis methods were used to identify, characterize, and summarize patterns found in the interview data relating to reasons for these preferences. 100 patients were interviewed (female, 75.0%; mean age, 53.9 years; mean 11.6 years since diagnosis). Among the four treatment modes, oral administration was allocated the highest mean (standard deviation) preference points (47.3 [33.1]) and was ranked first choice by the greatest percentage of patients (57.0%), followed by self-injection (29.7 [27.7]; 29.0%), infusion (15.4 [24.6]; 16.0%), and clinic-injection (7.5 [14.1]; 2.0%). Overall, 56.0% of patients had a "strong" first-choice preference (ie, point allocation ≥70); most of these patients chose oral (62.5%) vs self-injection (23.2%), infusion (10.7%), or clinic-injection (3.6%). Speed and/or ease of administration were the most commonly reported reasons for patients choosing oral (52.6%) or self-injection (55.2%). The most common reasons for patients not choosing oral or self-injection were not wanting to take another pill (37.2%) and avoiding pain due to needles (46.5%), respectively. These data report factors important to patients regarding preferences for RA treatment modes. Patients may benefit from discussions with their healthcare professionals and/or patient support groups, regarding RA treatment modes, to facilitate shared decision-making.</description><subject>Antiarthritic agents</subject><subject>Antirheumatic agents</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Baricitinib</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>drug administration</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>patient perspective</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Rankings</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatoid factor</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Tofacitinib</subject><issn>1177-889X</issn><issn>1177-889X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxQdRbK0--S4Dggiya74z8UFY6lehxcWu0LeQSe7spM5MajJT8b836651VyQPCTe_e8I9OUXxFKM5wUy-Xi4X80tCkMTsXnGMsZSzqlJX9_fOR8WjlK4RElQQ_LA4ogQRjAk9Lq5WEczYwzCWF8FBuYzQQITBQir9UH5pYerNGLwrF3Fsox99epPJWz-sy1X4YaIrL1sTwZXvwPrkwzC7MN_y7ePiQWO6BE92-0nx9cP71emn2fnnj2eni_OZFZiPs5ooriQHRYSsqbKuqgStpKKKYesQcGw4MNaoWlSGCWeNk4hxRus8gFSCnhRnW10XzLW-ib438acOxuvfhRDX2sTR2w50bkINra3DtGK8rpUSnNnsD1gJiPOs9XardTPVPTibXYmmOxA9vBl8q9fhVgtVoYrhLPByJxDD9wnSqHufLHSdGSBMSRPKMauk4Cijz_9Br8MUh2zVhhKUYknpX2pt8gB-aEJ-125E9UIQggXGFcvU_D9UXg56b8MAjc_1g4YXew0tmG5sU-imMf9fOgRfbUEbQ0o5G3dmYKQ36dM5fXqXvkw_2_fvjv0TN_oLA_nRMA</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Taylor, Peter C</creator><creator>Betteridge, Neil</creator><creator>Brown, T Michelle</creator><creator>Woolcott, John</creator><creator>Kivitz, Alan J</creator><creator>Zerbini, Cristiano</creator><creator>Whalley, Diane</creator><creator>Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe</creator><creator>Chen, Connie</creator><creator>Dahl, Palle</creator><creator>Ponce de Leon, Dario</creator><creator>Gruben, David</creator><creator>Fallon, Lara</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Dove</general><general>Dove Medical Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5289</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-6167</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making</title><author>Taylor, Peter C ; Betteridge, Neil ; Brown, T Michelle ; Woolcott, John ; Kivitz, Alan J ; Zerbini, Cristiano ; Whalley, Diane ; Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe ; Chen, Connie ; Dahl, Palle ; Ponce de Leon, Dario ; Gruben, David ; Fallon, Lara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-b295975e9267b39cd88638793941cd0e51a5e44f9b68a46dcad704543b2117963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antiarthritic agents</topic><topic>Antirheumatic agents</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Baricitinib</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>drug administration</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>patient perspective</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Rankings</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatoid factor</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Tofacitinib</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betteridge, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, T Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolcott, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbini, Cristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalley, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Connie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Palle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce de Leon, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruben, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallon, Lara</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Peter C</au><au>Betteridge, Neil</au><au>Brown, T Michelle</au><au>Woolcott, John</au><au>Kivitz, Alan J</au><au>Zerbini, Cristiano</au><au>Whalley, Diane</au><au>Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe</au><au>Chen, Connie</au><au>Dahl, Palle</au><au>Ponce de Leon, Dario</au><au>Gruben, David</au><au>Fallon, Lara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle><addtitle>Patient Prefer Adherence</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>119</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>119-131</pages><issn>1177-889X</issn><eissn>1177-889X</eissn><abstract>Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. In this multi-national, cross-sectional, qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with adult patients with RA in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Patients' strength of preference was evaluated using a 100-point allocation task (0-100; 100=strongest) across four treatment modes: oral, self-injection, clinic-injection, and infusion. Qualitative descriptive analysis methods were used to identify, characterize, and summarize patterns found in the interview data relating to reasons for these preferences. 100 patients were interviewed (female, 75.0%; mean age, 53.9 years; mean 11.6 years since diagnosis). Among the four treatment modes, oral administration was allocated the highest mean (standard deviation) preference points (47.3 [33.1]) and was ranked first choice by the greatest percentage of patients (57.0%), followed by self-injection (29.7 [27.7]; 29.0%), infusion (15.4 [24.6]; 16.0%), and clinic-injection (7.5 [14.1]; 2.0%). Overall, 56.0% of patients had a "strong" first-choice preference (ie, point allocation ≥70); most of these patients chose oral (62.5%) vs self-injection (23.2%), infusion (10.7%), or clinic-injection (3.6%). Speed and/or ease of administration were the most commonly reported reasons for patients choosing oral (52.6%) or self-injection (55.2%). The most common reasons for patients not choosing oral or self-injection were not wanting to take another pill (37.2%) and avoiding pain due to needles (46.5%), respectively. These data report factors important to patients regarding preferences for RA treatment modes. Patients may benefit from discussions with their healthcare professionals and/or patient support groups, regarding RA treatment modes, to facilitate shared decision-making.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub><pmid>32021123</pmid><doi>10.2147/PPA.S220714</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5289</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-6167</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1177-889X
ispartof Patient preference and adherence, 2020-01, Vol.14, p.119-131
issn 1177-889X
1177-889X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43b0f3bcd13845bb99654c889ec7e055
source PubMed (Medline); Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Antiarthritic agents
Antirheumatic agents
Arthritis
Baricitinib
Care and treatment
Clinical decision making
Decision making
drug administration
Hypothesis testing
Interviews
Medical personnel
Medical research
Original Research
Pain
patient perspective
Patients
Pharmaceutical industry
Physicians
Preferences
Qualitative research
Quality of life
Rankings
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid factor
surveys
Tofacitinib
title Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20Mode%20Preferences%20in%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis:%20Moving%20Toward%20Shared%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Patient%20preference%20and%20adherence&rft.au=Taylor,%20Peter%20C&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=119-131&rft.issn=1177-889X&rft.eissn=1177-889X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/PPA.S220714&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA622161184%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c615t-b295975e9267b39cd88638793941cd0e51a5e44f9b68a46dcad704543b2117963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2356331733&rft_id=info:pmid/32021123&rft_galeid=A622161184&rfr_iscdi=true