Loading…

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke Research and Treatment 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344
Main Authors: Takeuchi, Naoyuki, Izumi, Shin-Ichi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13
container_end_page 344
container_issue 2012
container_start_page 335
container_title Stroke Research and Treatment
container_volume 2012
creator Takeuchi, Naoyuki
Izumi, Shin-Ichi
description Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2012/584727
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A317781105</galeid><airiti_id>P20150731001_201212_201706150055_201706150055_335_344</airiti_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A317781105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotXSE2dQJCSEQNv6I4kTDkilolBpC4ivAxfLa493vSR2sZOt-u-ZNKXqSkgkip3MPH498bxZ9piSQ0rL8ogRyo7KuhBM3Mv2GSnYnJCyuj--N2ReU1LuZQcpbQhenDWcFA-zPcZJSWhT72c_Pwbv_FYlt4X8bVTO51971w2t6l3wuQ0xPw89jl9Ahy3Eq1zZHiJCMfyC1_k56LXyLnUpV97kp0M_RMh_OLhMj7IHVrUJDm7mWfb99N23kw_zxaf3ZyfHi7kSXPRzVjGx1IaCXjbGUi6KipbcECoqa4ulVY2uS1hCWQHwCppKgFXMCqKZwTjls-xs0jVBbeRFdJ2KVzIoJ68DIa6kir3TLciCa2rAkKqwosBNl6quKcWDMdxWgNvOsjeT1sWw7MBo8H1U7Y7obsa7tVyFreRFxWnDUeDFjUAMvwdIvexc0tC2ykMYkqSkKWvKqWCIPpvQlcLSnLcBFfWIy2MExFjZWNHhPyi8DXROBw_WYXxnwfM7C9ag2n6dQjuM_Uy74KsJ1DGkFMHe_iYlcjSXHM0lJ3Mh_fTuydyyf62EwMsJWDtv1KX7j9qTCQZEsJ-3cFEz0VSYX0x55aLrndyEIXo0kfyMKiURHJtGrxVREydB0DRo_HL3g3N8ioL_AVp180g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095813172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creator><contributor>Altamura, Claudia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi ; Altamura, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-8105</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2042-0056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-0056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2012/584727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23050198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Brain stimulation ; Care and treatment ; Health aspects ; Movement disorders ; Neural networks ; Physiological aspects ; Review ; Stroke (Disease)</subject><ispartof>Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Naoyuki Takeuchi and Shin-Ichi Izumi.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 N. Takeuchi and S.-I. Izumi. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463193/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Altamura, Claudia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><title>Stroke Research and Treatment</title><addtitle>Stroke Res Treat</addtitle><description>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</description><subject>Brain stimulation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stroke (Disease)</subject><issn>2090-8105</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotXSE2dQJCSEQNv6I4kTDkilolBpC4ivAxfLa493vSR2sZOt-u-ZNKXqSkgkip3MPH498bxZ9piSQ0rL8ogRyo7KuhBM3Mv2GSnYnJCyuj--N2ReU1LuZQcpbQhenDWcFA-zPcZJSWhT72c_Pwbv_FYlt4X8bVTO51971w2t6l3wuQ0xPw89jl9Ahy3Eq1zZHiJCMfyC1_k56LXyLnUpV97kp0M_RMh_OLhMj7IHVrUJDm7mWfb99N23kw_zxaf3ZyfHi7kSXPRzVjGx1IaCXjbGUi6KipbcECoqa4ulVY2uS1hCWQHwCppKgFXMCqKZwTjls-xs0jVBbeRFdJ2KVzIoJ68DIa6kir3TLciCa2rAkKqwosBNl6quKcWDMdxWgNvOsjeT1sWw7MBo8H1U7Y7obsa7tVyFreRFxWnDUeDFjUAMvwdIvexc0tC2ykMYkqSkKWvKqWCIPpvQlcLSnLcBFfWIy2MExFjZWNHhPyi8DXROBw_WYXxnwfM7C9ag2n6dQjuM_Uy74KsJ1DGkFMHe_iYlcjSXHM0lJ3Mh_fTuydyyf62EwMsJWDtv1KX7j9qTCQZEsJ-3cFEz0VSYX0x55aLrndyEIXo0kfyMKiURHJtGrxVREydB0DRo_HL3g3N8ioL_AVp180g</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creator><creator>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><author>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Brain stimulation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stroke (Disease)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Stroke Research and Treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</au><au>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</au><au>Altamura, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</atitle><jtitle>Stroke Research and Treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke Res Treat</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>335-344</pages><issn>2090-8105</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><eissn>2042-0056</eissn><abstract>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>23050198</pmid><doi>10.1155/2012/584727</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-8105
ispartof Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
2042-0056
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15
source Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Brain stimulation
Care and treatment
Health aspects
Movement disorders
Neural networks
Physiological aspects
Review
Stroke (Disease)
title Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noninvasive%20Brain%20Stimulation%20for%20Motor%20Recovery%20after%20Stroke:%20Mechanisms%20and%20Future%20Views&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20Research%20and%20Treatment&rft.au=Takeuchi,%20Naoyuki&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=335-344&rft.issn=2090-8105&rft.eissn=2042-0056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2012/584727&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA317781105%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095813172&rft_id=info:pmid/23050198&rft_galeid=A317781105&rft_airiti_id=P20150731001_201212_201706150055_201706150055_335_344&rfr_iscdi=true