Loading…
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Stroke Research and Treatment 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13 |
container_end_page | 344 |
container_issue | 2012 |
container_start_page | 335 |
container_title | Stroke Research and Treatment |
container_volume | 2012 |
creator | Takeuchi, Naoyuki Izumi, Shin-Ichi |
description | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2012/584727 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A317781105</galeid><airiti_id>P20150731001_201212_201706150055_201706150055_335_344</airiti_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A317781105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotXSE2dQJCSEQNv6I4kTDkilolBpC4ivAxfLa493vSR2sZOt-u-ZNKXqSkgkip3MPH498bxZ9piSQ0rL8ogRyo7KuhBM3Mv2GSnYnJCyuj--N2ReU1LuZQcpbQhenDWcFA-zPcZJSWhT72c_Pwbv_FYlt4X8bVTO51971w2t6l3wuQ0xPw89jl9Ahy3Eq1zZHiJCMfyC1_k56LXyLnUpV97kp0M_RMh_OLhMj7IHVrUJDm7mWfb99N23kw_zxaf3ZyfHi7kSXPRzVjGx1IaCXjbGUi6KipbcECoqa4ulVY2uS1hCWQHwCppKgFXMCqKZwTjls-xs0jVBbeRFdJ2KVzIoJ68DIa6kir3TLciCa2rAkKqwosBNl6quKcWDMdxWgNvOsjeT1sWw7MBo8H1U7Y7obsa7tVyFreRFxWnDUeDFjUAMvwdIvexc0tC2ykMYkqSkKWvKqWCIPpvQlcLSnLcBFfWIy2MExFjZWNHhPyi8DXROBw_WYXxnwfM7C9ag2n6dQjuM_Uy74KsJ1DGkFMHe_iYlcjSXHM0lJ3Mh_fTuydyyf62EwMsJWDtv1KX7j9qTCQZEsJ-3cFEz0VSYX0x55aLrndyEIXo0kfyMKiURHJtGrxVREydB0DRo_HL3g3N8ioL_AVp180g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1095813172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creator><contributor>Altamura, Claudia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi ; Altamura, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-8105</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2042-0056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-0056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2012/584727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23050198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Brain stimulation ; Care and treatment ; Health aspects ; Movement disorders ; Neural networks ; Physiological aspects ; Review ; Stroke (Disease)</subject><ispartof>Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Naoyuki Takeuchi and Shin-Ichi Izumi.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 N. Takeuchi and S.-I. Izumi. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463193/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463193/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Altamura, Claudia</contributor><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><title>Stroke Research and Treatment</title><addtitle>Stroke Res Treat</addtitle><description>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</description><subject>Brain stimulation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stroke (Disease)</subject><issn>2090-8105</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotXSE2dQJCSEQNv6I4kTDkilolBpC4ivAxfLa493vSR2sZOt-u-ZNKXqSkgkip3MPH498bxZ9piSQ0rL8ogRyo7KuhBM3Mv2GSnYnJCyuj--N2ReU1LuZQcpbQhenDWcFA-zPcZJSWhT72c_Pwbv_FYlt4X8bVTO51971w2t6l3wuQ0xPw89jl9Ahy3Eq1zZHiJCMfyC1_k56LXyLnUpV97kp0M_RMh_OLhMj7IHVrUJDm7mWfb99N23kw_zxaf3ZyfHi7kSXPRzVjGx1IaCXjbGUi6KipbcECoqa4ulVY2uS1hCWQHwCppKgFXMCqKZwTjls-xs0jVBbeRFdJ2KVzIoJ68DIa6kir3TLciCa2rAkKqwosBNl6quKcWDMdxWgNvOsjeT1sWw7MBo8H1U7Y7obsa7tVyFreRFxWnDUeDFjUAMvwdIvexc0tC2ykMYkqSkKWvKqWCIPpvQlcLSnLcBFfWIy2MExFjZWNHhPyi8DXROBw_WYXxnwfM7C9ag2n6dQjuM_Uy74KsJ1DGkFMHe_iYlcjSXHM0lJ3Mh_fTuydyyf62EwMsJWDtv1KX7j9qTCQZEsJ-3cFEz0VSYX0x55aLrndyEIXo0kfyMKiURHJtGrxVREydB0DRo_HL3g3N8ioL_AVp180g</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creator><creator>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</title><author>Takeuchi, Naoyuki ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Brain stimulation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stroke (Disease)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Stroke Research and Treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeuchi, Naoyuki</au><au>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</au><au>Altamura, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views</atitle><jtitle>Stroke Research and Treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke Res Treat</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2012</volume><issue>2012</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>335-344</pages><issn>2090-8105</issn><issn>2042-0056</issn><eissn>2042-0056</eissn><abstract>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques that can alter excitability of the human cortex. Considering the interhemispheric competition occurring after stroke, improvement in motor deficits can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Many reports have shown that NIBS application improves motor function in stroke patients by using their physiological peculiarity. For continuous motor improvement, it is important to impart additional motor training while NIBS modulates the neural network between both hemispheres and remodels the disturbed network in the affected hemisphere. NIBS can be an adjuvant therapy for developed neurorehabilitation strategies for stroke patients. Moreover, recent studies have reported that bilateral NIBS can more effectively facilitate neural plasticity and induce motor recovery after stroke. However, the best NIBS pattern has not been established, and clinicians should select the type of NIBS by considering the NIBS mechanism. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms and future views of NIBS therapy and propose rehabilitation approaches for appropriate cortical reorganization.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>23050198</pmid><doi>10.1155/2012/584727</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-2808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-8105 |
ispartof | Stroke Research and Treatment, 2012-01, Vol.2012 (2012), p.335-344 |
issn | 2090-8105 2042-0056 2042-0056 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43c1ded064f74bcdba8811003d3f6e15 |
source | Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Brain stimulation Care and treatment Health aspects Movement disorders Neural networks Physiological aspects Review Stroke (Disease) |
title | Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Future Views |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noninvasive%20Brain%20Stimulation%20for%20Motor%20Recovery%20after%20Stroke:%20Mechanisms%20and%20Future%20Views&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20Research%20and%20Treatment&rft.au=Takeuchi,%20Naoyuki&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=2012&rft.issue=2012&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=335-344&rft.issn=2090-8105&rft.eissn=2042-0056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2012/584727&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA317781105%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a737t-2627bcd1ecb9df13746153d0176ff4bfa9c85ebe56ee36e967efa2f70c2d5eb13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1095813172&rft_id=info:pmid/23050198&rft_galeid=A317781105&rft_airiti_id=P20150731001_201212_201706150055_201706150055_335_344&rfr_iscdi=true |