The study on setting priorities of zoonotic agents for medical preparedness and allocation of research resources

• Published in: PloS one 2024-04, Vol.19 (4), p.e0299527-e0299527
• Main Authors: Wang, Kung-Ching, Chang, Chia-Lin, Wei, Sung-Hsi, Chang, Chao-Chin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biology and Life Sciences; Case-Control Studies; Development and progression; Evaluation; Health Priorities; Humans; Infection control; Lassa fever; Logistic Models; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Medicine, Experimental; People and Places; Prevention; Public health administration; Resource Allocation; Zoonoses; Zoonoses - epidemiology; Zoonoses - prevention & control; Zoonoses - transmission
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299527

The aim of this study is to develop a scoring platform to be used as a reference for both medical preparedness and research resource allocation in the prioritization of zoonoses. Using a case-control design, a comprehensive analysis of 46 zoonoses was conducted to identify factors influencing disease prioritization. This analysis provides a basis for constructing models and calculating prioritization scores for different diseases. The case group (n = 23) includes diseases that require immediate notification to health authorities within 24 hours of diagnosis. The control group (n = 23) includes diseases that do not require such immediate notification. Two different models were developed for primary disease prioritization: one model incorporated the four most commonly used prioritization criteria identified through an extensive literature review. The second model used the results of multiple logistic regression analysis to identify significant factors (with p-value less than 0.1) associated with 24-hour reporting, allowing for objective determination of disease prioritization criteria. These different modeling approaches may result in different weights and positive or negative effects of relevant factors within each model. Our study results highlight the variability of zoonotic disease information across time and geographic regions. It provides an objective platform to rank zoonoses and highlights the critical need for regular updates in the prioritization process to ensure timely preparedness. This study successfully established an objective framework for assessing the importance of zoonotic diseases. From a government perspective, it advocates applying principles that consider disease characteristics and medical resource preparedness in prioritization. The results of this study also emphasize the need for dynamic prioritization to effectively improve preparedness to prevent and control disease.