Loading…

Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation

Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of urology 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195
Main Authors: Singh, Abhishek, Jai, Shrikant, Ganpule, Arvind, Vijayakumar, Mohankumar, Sabnis, Ravindra, Desai, Mahesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643
cites
container_end_page 195
container_issue 3
container_start_page 189
container_title Indian journal of urology
container_volume 34
creator Singh, Abhishek
Jai, Shrikant
Ganpule, Arvind
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar
Sabnis, Ravindra
Desai, Mahesh
description Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5. Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group. Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A545408705</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A545408705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1v0zAYxiMEYmVw5IoiceGwFH8lsS9I08SgaBIc2NlynNed29QuTtJq_z1vaVcoqmzJH_n5ee0nT5a9pWQqKOEf_WKczr7da1FpKp9lE6qULLhk4nk2IaomBS0Vvche9f2CEEElq15mF5wQLihTk2x-ayxc5TaGAcJwlZvQ7hb9kEY75BvT-dYPj3l0uclD3ECX2wdvlxDyVWxx5WLKO7M2KfY2rr3NxwQDJJwk8Kt1Z8JgBh_D6-yFM10Pbw7jZXZ_-_nnzdfi7vuX2c31XWGrUtmiYUZaSSSVZHf5UoGpuePOApVOGtLIklZQNkYQVgrFjaO8MbYsnbCGVoJfZrO9bhvNQq-TX5n0qKPx-s9GTHNt0uBtB1pwaBpXAwOnBFYzSrVOtkwy5aBuGGp92mutx2YFrUWDkulORE-_BP-g53GjK3RXMIoCHw4CKf4aoR_0yvcWOnQF4thrRmpBOWNVhej7_9BFHFNAq5CqBK2qmrG_1NzgA3xwEevanai-LkUpiETPkCrOUHMIgJeMAZzH7RN-eobH1sLK27MHDgUs_vY-gTt6QonepVJjKvUxlci_-9fII_0UQwR-7IFt7DA9_bIbt5A0sssQt-dVsSu9S68-hFdjdvVTdvlvTjP67A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2064166722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5. Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group. Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30034129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Chickens ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Dissection ; Esophagus ; Laboratories ; Laparoscopy ; Original ; Simulation ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Teaching ; Training ; Urologic surgery ; Urology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of urology, 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd. Jul/Sep 2018</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2064166722/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2064166722?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27456,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jai, Shrikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganpule, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabnis, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><title>Indian journal of urology</title><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><description>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5. Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group. Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</description><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Urologic surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0970-1591</issn><issn>1998-3824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1v0zAYxiMEYmVw5IoiceGwFH8lsS9I08SgaBIc2NlynNed29QuTtJq_z1vaVcoqmzJH_n5ee0nT5a9pWQqKOEf_WKczr7da1FpKp9lE6qULLhk4nk2IaomBS0Vvche9f2CEEElq15mF5wQLihTk2x-ayxc5TaGAcJwlZvQ7hb9kEY75BvT-dYPj3l0uclD3ECX2wdvlxDyVWxx5WLKO7M2KfY2rr3NxwQDJJwk8Kt1Z8JgBh_D6-yFM10Pbw7jZXZ_-_nnzdfi7vuX2c31XWGrUtmiYUZaSSSVZHf5UoGpuePOApVOGtLIklZQNkYQVgrFjaO8MbYsnbCGVoJfZrO9bhvNQq-TX5n0qKPx-s9GTHNt0uBtB1pwaBpXAwOnBFYzSrVOtkwy5aBuGGp92mutx2YFrUWDkulORE-_BP-g53GjK3RXMIoCHw4CKf4aoR_0yvcWOnQF4thrRmpBOWNVhej7_9BFHFNAq5CqBK2qmrG_1NzgA3xwEevanai-LkUpiETPkCrOUHMIgJeMAZzH7RN-eobH1sLK27MHDgUs_vY-gTt6QonepVJjKvUxlci_-9fII_0UQwR-7IFt7DA9_bIbt5A0sssQt-dVsSu9S68-hFdjdvVTdvlvTjP67A</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Singh, Abhishek</creator><creator>Jai, Shrikant</creator><creator>Ganpule, Arvind</creator><creator>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creator><creator>Sabnis, Ravindra</creator><creator>Desai, Mahesh</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><author>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Urologic surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jai, Shrikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganpule, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabnis, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Abhishek</au><au>Jai, Shrikant</au><au>Ganpule, Arvind</au><au>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</au><au>Sabnis, Ravindra</au><au>Desai, Mahesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>189-195</pages><issn>0970-1591</issn><eissn>1998-3824</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5. Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group. Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>30034129</pmid><doi>10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0970-1591
ispartof Indian journal of urology, 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central (PMC)
subjects Chickens
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Dissection
Esophagus
Laboratories
Laparoscopy
Original
Simulation
Surgery
Systematic review
Teaching
Training
Urologic surgery
Urology
Validity
title Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Face,%20content,%20and%20construct%20validity%20of%20a%20novel%20chicken%20model%20for%20laparoscopic%20ureteric%20reimplantation&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Singh,%20Abhishek&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=189-195&rft.issn=0970-1591&rft.eissn=1998-3824&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA545408705%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2064166722&rft_id=info:pmid/30034129&rft_galeid=A545408705&rfr_iscdi=true