Loading…
Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation
Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set. We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conduct...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of urology 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 195 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Indian journal of urology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Singh, Abhishek Jai, Shrikant Ganpule, Arvind Vijayakumar, Mohankumar Sabnis, Ravindra Desai, Mahesh |
description | Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set.
We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation.
Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5.
Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group.
Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A545408705</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A545408705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1v0zAYxiMEYmVw5IoiceGwFH8lsS9I08SgaBIc2NlynNed29QuTtJq_z1vaVcoqmzJH_n5ee0nT5a9pWQqKOEf_WKczr7da1FpKp9lE6qULLhk4nk2IaomBS0Vvche9f2CEEElq15mF5wQLihTk2x-ayxc5TaGAcJwlZvQ7hb9kEY75BvT-dYPj3l0uclD3ECX2wdvlxDyVWxx5WLKO7M2KfY2rr3NxwQDJJwk8Kt1Z8JgBh_D6-yFM10Pbw7jZXZ_-_nnzdfi7vuX2c31XWGrUtmiYUZaSSSVZHf5UoGpuePOApVOGtLIklZQNkYQVgrFjaO8MbYsnbCGVoJfZrO9bhvNQq-TX5n0qKPx-s9GTHNt0uBtB1pwaBpXAwOnBFYzSrVOtkwy5aBuGGp92mutx2YFrUWDkulORE-_BP-g53GjK3RXMIoCHw4CKf4aoR_0yvcWOnQF4thrRmpBOWNVhej7_9BFHFNAq5CqBK2qmrG_1NzgA3xwEevanai-LkUpiETPkCrOUHMIgJeMAZzH7RN-eobH1sLK27MHDgUs_vY-gTt6QonepVJjKvUxlci_-9fII_0UQwR-7IFt7DA9_bIbt5A0sssQt-dVsSu9S68-hFdjdvVTdvlvTjP67A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2064166722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set.
We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation.
Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5.
Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group.
Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3824</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30034129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Chickens ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Dissection ; Esophagus ; Laboratories ; Laparoscopy ; Original ; Simulation ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Teaching ; Training ; Urologic surgery ; Urology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of urology, 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jul/Sep 2018</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2064166722/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2064166722?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27456,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jai, Shrikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganpule, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabnis, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><title>Indian journal of urology</title><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><description>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set.
We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation.
Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5.
Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group.
Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</description><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Urologic surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0970-1591</issn><issn>1998-3824</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1v0zAYxiMEYmVw5IoiceGwFH8lsS9I08SgaBIc2NlynNed29QuTtJq_z1vaVcoqmzJH_n5ee0nT5a9pWQqKOEf_WKczr7da1FpKp9lE6qULLhk4nk2IaomBS0Vvche9f2CEEElq15mF5wQLihTk2x-ayxc5TaGAcJwlZvQ7hb9kEY75BvT-dYPj3l0uclD3ECX2wdvlxDyVWxx5WLKO7M2KfY2rr3NxwQDJJwk8Kt1Z8JgBh_D6-yFM10Pbw7jZXZ_-_nnzdfi7vuX2c31XWGrUtmiYUZaSSSVZHf5UoGpuePOApVOGtLIklZQNkYQVgrFjaO8MbYsnbCGVoJfZrO9bhvNQq-TX5n0qKPx-s9GTHNt0uBtB1pwaBpXAwOnBFYzSrVOtkwy5aBuGGp92mutx2YFrUWDkulORE-_BP-g53GjK3RXMIoCHw4CKf4aoR_0yvcWOnQF4thrRmpBOWNVhej7_9BFHFNAq5CqBK2qmrG_1NzgA3xwEevanai-LkUpiETPkCrOUHMIgJeMAZzH7RN-eobH1sLK27MHDgUs_vY-gTt6QonepVJjKvUxlci_-9fII_0UQwR-7IFt7DA9_bIbt5A0sssQt-dVsSu9S68-hFdjdvVTdvlvTjP67A</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Singh, Abhishek</creator><creator>Jai, Shrikant</creator><creator>Ganpule, Arvind</creator><creator>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creator><creator>Sabnis, Ravindra</creator><creator>Desai, Mahesh</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</title><author>Singh, Abhishek ; Jai, Shrikant ; Ganpule, Arvind ; Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ; Sabnis, Ravindra ; Desai, Mahesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Urologic surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jai, Shrikant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganpule, Arvind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabnis, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Abhishek</au><au>Jai, Shrikant</au><au>Ganpule, Arvind</au><au>Vijayakumar, Mohankumar</au><au>Sabnis, Ravindra</au><au>Desai, Mahesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Urol</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>189-195</pages><issn>0970-1591</issn><eissn>1998-3824</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology is essential, as these surgeries require a different skill set.
We validated a chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation.
Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study was conducted from August 2016 till February 2017. Thirty novice surgeons and 20 trained laparoscopic surgeons were included in the study. The relevant chicken anatomy and surgical steps were described to all the surgeons. The surgeons were asked to fill an eight-point questionnaire after finishing the procedure and score it on a scale of 1-5. The trainee's performance was also recorded by an investigator on a proforma. The investigator recorded dissection time, suturing time, quality of dissection, quality of suturing, and integrity of anastomosis on a scale of 1-5.
Results: All the participants in the study gave a mean score of 3 or more to all the questions asked, except for one question pertaining to tissue feel. Both the groups rated the usefulness of the model very highly with a mean score of 4.20 and 4.15, respectively. Difference in the time taken for dissection and suturing along with the quality of suturing was statistically significant in favor of the expert group.
Conclusions: The chicken model for laparoscopic left modified Lich Gregoir type of ureteric reimplantation is a useful, effective, cognitive training tool. This model has a face, content, and construct validity to be used as a teaching and learning tool in laparoscopic urology.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>30034129</pmid><doi>10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-1591 |
ispartof | Indian journal of urology, 2018-07, Vol.34 (3), p.189-195 |
issn | 0970-1591 1998-3824 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_43ebbf7e2ef94097a99df8d2829fe7b2 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central (PMC) |
subjects | Chickens Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Dissection Esophagus Laboratories Laparoscopy Original Simulation Surgery Systematic review Teaching Training Urologic surgery Urology Validity |
title | Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Face,%20content,%20and%20construct%20validity%20of%20a%20novel%20chicken%20model%20for%20laparoscopic%20ureteric%20reimplantation&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Singh,%20Abhishek&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=189-195&rft.issn=0970-1591&rft.eissn=1998-3824&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/iju.IJU_46_18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA545408705%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c659c-b2a8c808180097059ea73f3fce18f8a0b8516e5ba4025493af13bac55f4ca1643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2064166722&rft_id=info:pmid/30034129&rft_galeid=A545408705&rfr_iscdi=true |