Fate of Sulfate in the Course of Japanese Drinking Water Purification Plants −Implications for Dialysis Therapy

Sulfate is currently not regulated by Japanese water quality standards but could pose adverse health effects to dialysis patients if it remains in high concentration (more than 100 mg/L) in dialysis water and dialysis fluid prepared at healthcare facilities (HCFs). In this study, we obtained sulfate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Water and Environment Technology 2020, Vol.18(1), pp.54-61
Main Authors: Simazaki, Dai, Futami, Kousei, Ichimaru, Kodai, Kumagai, Taiki, Konuma, Susumu, Saito, Toshiaki, Akiba, Michihiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alum
Chemicals
Coagulation
Dialysis
Drinking water
Health care facilities
Health risks
healthcare facility
Hemodialysis
Levels
Medical personnel
Organic chemistry
Purification
Quality management
Quality standards
Raw water
Statistical methods
sulfate
Sulfates
Sulfuric acid
Sulphuric acid
Water analysis
Water management
Water purification
Water quality
Water quality management
Water quality standards
Water sampling
Water supply
Water treatment
water treatment chemical
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sulfate is currently not regulated by Japanese water quality standards but could pose adverse health effects to dialysis patients if it remains in high concentration (more than 100 mg/L) in dialysis water and dialysis fluid prepared at healthcare facilities (HCFs). In this study, we obtained sulfate levels in raw water and finished water at Japanese drinking water purification plants (DWPPs) from “Statistics on Water Supply (Water Quality)” in FY2012-2014, and then estimated increases in sulfate by water purification processes. Impact of water treatment chemicals containing sulfate (e.g., alum for coagulation and sulfuric acid for pH adjustment) was also evaluated by water sampling at selected three DWPPs. In FY2012-14, sulfate levels in finished water were mostly less than 50 mg/L; however, sulfate at 18 out of 1,497 DWPPs exceeded 100 mg/L. Increases in sulfate level by dosing of the water treatment chemicals were typically less than 10 mg/L, and other part of the sulfate in finished water came from raw water. These information on water quality should be shared with medical professionals conducting the dialysis therapies, and it would be worthwhile to collaborate with them in water quality management at HCFs.
ISSN:1348-2165
1348-2165
DOI:10.2965/jwet.19-079