Loading…
The life cycle of Transparent: Envisioning queer space, time and business practice
The queerness of the series Transparent (2014–2019), both textually and extratextually, offers a paradigm for understanding just how flexible and revolutionary digital TV can be. Queerness becomes a mechanism freeing both the television text and the business practices supporting it. The result is a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alphaville 2019-01 (16), p.80-96 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The queerness of the series Transparent (2014–2019), both textually and extratextually,
offers a paradigm for understanding just how flexible and revolutionary digital TV can be.
Queerness becomes a mechanism freeing both the television text and the business practices
supporting it. The result is a radically reformed life cycle for both the television text and the
attendant commercial structures. Launched in 2014 from Amazon Studios, Jill Soloway’s
Transparent suggests that narrative ruptures in the life cycle are as significant as the technological
or business shifts. Unlike the traditional US broadcast/cable model, the economics of the show
merely reflect Amazon Prime’s desire to be both a means of delivery and an original content
provider. In this way, original series add value to the company and hopefully the stock price.
Business practice, methods and revenue are reformed, allowing for television “product” that need
not adhere to the traditional models of commercial television. Narratively, the radical way through
which Soloway connects the two disparate stories in Season Two requires viewers to set aside
their expectations on cause and effect in television storytelling. Time, space, and causation are
also altered within Soloway’s text. Certainly, there are specific links in terms of the characters’
lineage, but the creators of Transparent also seemingly want us to consider “life cycle” in a much
different and queerer way than is usual for television programming. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2009-4078 2009-4078 |
DOI: | 10.33178/alpha.16.06 |