Loading…

Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation

Abstract Background Patients with long-term complications associated with subglandular breast augmentation are being seen in increasing numbers in the Southern California community. Late deformities include a characteristic “slide-down” deformity as well as capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum 2021-06, Vol.3 (2), p.ojab009-ojab009
Main Authors: Hauch, Adam T, Francis, Cameron S, Artz, Jourdain D, Chasan, Paul E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43
container_end_page ojab009
container_issue 2
container_start_page ojab009
container_title Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum
container_volume 3
creator Hauch, Adam T
Francis, Cameron S
Artz, Jourdain D
Chasan, Paul E
description Abstract Background Patients with long-term complications associated with subglandular breast augmentation are being seen in increasing numbers in the Southern California community. Late deformities include a characteristic “slide-down” deformity as well as capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and nipple-areola complex enlargement. Repositioning the implant to a subpectoral pocket is a recognized revisionary technique to treat this problem; however, technical details of how this is accomplished are lacking in the literature. Objectives To review our technique for treating long-term complications associated with subglandular implants using subpectoral repositioning with partial capsule preservation and mastopexy, without the need for an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or mesh. Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing subpectoral repositioning over the course of 6 years was performed. Patient data and long-term outcomes were assessed. A technique is presented utilizing a partial capsulectomy that preserves a portion of the capsule as an ADM/mesh equivalent, ensuring adequate implant coverage and preventing window shading of the pectoralis major muscle. Results Twenty-four patients with subglandular implants and slide-down deformity as well as other associated complications including capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and enlarged areolas underwent revision surgery with a subpectoral site change. Often, patients presented many years after their initial augmentation (mean 18 years, range 4-38 years). The average patient follow-up was 3.1 years (range 1.0-6.8 years). Two patients required minor revisions with local anesthetic, while another 2 revisions required general anesthesia. Conclusions Long-term deformities associated with subglandular breast augmentation can reliably be corrected by subpectoral repositioning, mastopexy, and utilization of residual breast capsule in the place of an ADM or mesh. Level of Evidence: 4
doi_str_mv 10.1093/asjof/ojab009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_449d53dec82a45f18418d38cafec8ec5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/asjof/ojab009</oup_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_449d53dec82a45f18418d38cafec8ec5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548402218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEolXpki3ykk2ob5k4LJDKiMJII1HBIJbWiXOS8SiJg-1U4iF453oulHbFykfHn__f55Jlrxl9x2glriDsXHvldlBTWj3LzvlCsFyWVfn8UXyWXYawo5TygnGmqpfZmZA8hVKcZ3--z_WEJjoPPVkNUw9jJN9wcsFG60Y7duSnjVtyCz7ahCxhCnOP5NZjQH8He-g92XhMUWLjFsnajV2-QT-QpUuC1hygQFxLklmXHJq5B08-pkchkuu5G3CMB-hV9qKFPuDl6bzIftx82iy_5Ouvn1fL63VupBIxr-uCtwthVIEUuKBUQMsk1FXTKgFCFRzromKGl4oKA7yUjMqCSlwIqIWR4iJbHXUbBzs9eTuA_60dWH1ION_pfb2mRy1l1RSiQaM4yKJlSjLVCGWgTSk0RdL6cNSa5nrAxqRaUi-fiD69Ge1Wd-5OKy5pKWkSeHsS8O7XjCHqwQaDfWoUujloXkglKU-jS2h-RI13IXhsH2wY1fuN0IeN0KeNSPybx397oP_O_5-3m6f_aN0DrbfFGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548402218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Hauch, Adam T ; Francis, Cameron S ; Artz, Jourdain D ; Chasan, Paul E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauch, Adam T ; Francis, Cameron S ; Artz, Jourdain D ; Chasan, Paul E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Patients with long-term complications associated with subglandular breast augmentation are being seen in increasing numbers in the Southern California community. Late deformities include a characteristic “slide-down” deformity as well as capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and nipple-areola complex enlargement. Repositioning the implant to a subpectoral pocket is a recognized revisionary technique to treat this problem; however, technical details of how this is accomplished are lacking in the literature. Objectives To review our technique for treating long-term complications associated with subglandular implants using subpectoral repositioning with partial capsule preservation and mastopexy, without the need for an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or mesh. Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing subpectoral repositioning over the course of 6 years was performed. Patient data and long-term outcomes were assessed. A technique is presented utilizing a partial capsulectomy that preserves a portion of the capsule as an ADM/mesh equivalent, ensuring adequate implant coverage and preventing window shading of the pectoralis major muscle. Results Twenty-four patients with subglandular implants and slide-down deformity as well as other associated complications including capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and enlarged areolas underwent revision surgery with a subpectoral site change. Often, patients presented many years after their initial augmentation (mean 18 years, range 4-38 years). The average patient follow-up was 3.1 years (range 1.0-6.8 years). Two patients required minor revisions with local anesthetic, while another 2 revisions required general anesthesia. Conclusions Long-term deformities associated with subglandular breast augmentation can reliably be corrected by subpectoral repositioning, mastopexy, and utilization of residual breast capsule in the place of an ADM or mesh. Level of Evidence: 4</description><identifier>ISSN: 2631-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2631-4797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojab009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34212143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Breast Surgery</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2021-06, Vol.3 (2), p.ojab009-ojab009</ispartof><rights>2021 The Aesthetic Society. 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Aesthetic Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3529-1069</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240740/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8240740/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauch, Adam T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Cameron S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artz, Jourdain D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chasan, Paul E</creatorcontrib><title>Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation</title><title>Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum</title><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J Open Forum</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Patients with long-term complications associated with subglandular breast augmentation are being seen in increasing numbers in the Southern California community. Late deformities include a characteristic “slide-down” deformity as well as capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and nipple-areola complex enlargement. Repositioning the implant to a subpectoral pocket is a recognized revisionary technique to treat this problem; however, technical details of how this is accomplished are lacking in the literature. Objectives To review our technique for treating long-term complications associated with subglandular implants using subpectoral repositioning with partial capsule preservation and mastopexy, without the need for an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or mesh. Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing subpectoral repositioning over the course of 6 years was performed. Patient data and long-term outcomes were assessed. A technique is presented utilizing a partial capsulectomy that preserves a portion of the capsule as an ADM/mesh equivalent, ensuring adequate implant coverage and preventing window shading of the pectoralis major muscle. Results Twenty-four patients with subglandular implants and slide-down deformity as well as other associated complications including capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and enlarged areolas underwent revision surgery with a subpectoral site change. Often, patients presented many years after their initial augmentation (mean 18 years, range 4-38 years). The average patient follow-up was 3.1 years (range 1.0-6.8 years). Two patients required minor revisions with local anesthetic, while another 2 revisions required general anesthesia. Conclusions Long-term deformities associated with subglandular breast augmentation can reliably be corrected by subpectoral repositioning, mastopexy, and utilization of residual breast capsule in the place of an ADM or mesh. Level of Evidence: 4</description><subject>Breast Surgery</subject><issn>2631-4797</issn><issn>2631-4797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEolXpki3ykk2ob5k4LJDKiMJII1HBIJbWiXOS8SiJg-1U4iF453oulHbFykfHn__f55Jlrxl9x2glriDsXHvldlBTWj3LzvlCsFyWVfn8UXyWXYawo5TygnGmqpfZmZA8hVKcZ3--z_WEJjoPPVkNUw9jJN9wcsFG60Y7duSnjVtyCz7ahCxhCnOP5NZjQH8He-g92XhMUWLjFsnajV2-QT-QpUuC1hygQFxLklmXHJq5B08-pkchkuu5G3CMB-hV9qKFPuDl6bzIftx82iy_5Ouvn1fL63VupBIxr-uCtwthVIEUuKBUQMsk1FXTKgFCFRzromKGl4oKA7yUjMqCSlwIqIWR4iJbHXUbBzs9eTuA_60dWH1ION_pfb2mRy1l1RSiQaM4yKJlSjLVCGWgTSk0RdL6cNSa5nrAxqRaUi-fiD69Ge1Wd-5OKy5pKWkSeHsS8O7XjCHqwQaDfWoUujloXkglKU-jS2h-RI13IXhsH2wY1fuN0IeN0KeNSPybx397oP_O_5-3m6f_aN0DrbfFGQ</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Hauch, Adam T</creator><creator>Francis, Cameron S</creator><creator>Artz, Jourdain D</creator><creator>Chasan, Paul E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-1069</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation</title><author>Hauch, Adam T ; Francis, Cameron S ; Artz, Jourdain D ; Chasan, Paul E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Breast Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauch, Adam T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Cameron S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artz, Jourdain D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chasan, Paul E</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauch, Adam T</au><au>Francis, Cameron S</au><au>Artz, Jourdain D</au><au>Chasan, Paul E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J Open Forum</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>ojab009</spage><epage>ojab009</epage><pages>ojab009-ojab009</pages><issn>2631-4797</issn><eissn>2631-4797</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Patients with long-term complications associated with subglandular breast augmentation are being seen in increasing numbers in the Southern California community. Late deformities include a characteristic “slide-down” deformity as well as capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and nipple-areola complex enlargement. Repositioning the implant to a subpectoral pocket is a recognized revisionary technique to treat this problem; however, technical details of how this is accomplished are lacking in the literature. Objectives To review our technique for treating long-term complications associated with subglandular implants using subpectoral repositioning with partial capsule preservation and mastopexy, without the need for an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or mesh. Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing subpectoral repositioning over the course of 6 years was performed. Patient data and long-term outcomes were assessed. A technique is presented utilizing a partial capsulectomy that preserves a portion of the capsule as an ADM/mesh equivalent, ensuring adequate implant coverage and preventing window shading of the pectoralis major muscle. Results Twenty-four patients with subglandular implants and slide-down deformity as well as other associated complications including capsular contracture, implant wrinkling, and enlarged areolas underwent revision surgery with a subpectoral site change. Often, patients presented many years after their initial augmentation (mean 18 years, range 4-38 years). The average patient follow-up was 3.1 years (range 1.0-6.8 years). Two patients required minor revisions with local anesthetic, while another 2 revisions required general anesthesia. Conclusions Long-term deformities associated with subglandular breast augmentation can reliably be corrected by subpectoral repositioning, mastopexy, and utilization of residual breast capsule in the place of an ADM or mesh. Level of Evidence: 4</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34212143</pmid><doi>10.1093/asjof/ojab009</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-1069</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2631-4797
ispartof Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2021-06, Vol.3 (2), p.ojab009-ojab009
issn 2631-4797
2631-4797
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_449d53dec82a45f18418d38cafec8ec5
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Breast Surgery
title Subpectoral Implant Repositioning With Partial Capsule Preservation: Treating the Long-Term Complications of Subglandular Breast Augmentation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subpectoral%20Implant%20Repositioning%20With%20Partial%20Capsule%20Preservation:%20Treating%20the%20Long-Term%20Complications%20of%20Subglandular%20Breast%20Augmentation&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20surgery%20journal.%20Open%20forum&rft.au=Hauch,%20Adam%20T&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=ojab009&rft.epage=ojab009&rft.pages=ojab009-ojab009&rft.issn=2631-4797&rft.eissn=2631-4797&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/asjof/ojab009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2548402218%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bb52f63c85e0a23003af14ab9df83a3852eb591c27803ca274104504e63ab3c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548402218&rft_id=info:pmid/34212143&rft_oup_id=10.1093/asjof/ojab009&rfr_iscdi=true