An Experimental Comparative Study of Large-Sized Direct Solar Fryers for Injera Baking Applications

• Published in: Energies (Basel) 2024-10, Vol.17 (19), p.4949
• Main Authors: Hailu, Mesele Hayelom, Kahsay, Mulu Bayray, Tesfay, Asfafaw Haileslassie, Nydal, Ole Jørgen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alternative energy sources; Aluminum; Biomass; Design; direct solar frying; Energy consumption; Energy storage; Flexibility; Food; Heat conductivity; Indoor air quality; injera baking; large-sized solar fryers; Radiation; Solar energy; solar fryers; solar frying; Thermal energy
• ISSN: 1996-1073; 1996-1073
• DOI: 10.3390/en17194949

This research experimentally demonstrates the practicability of using large-sized direct solar frying as an alternative technology for the predominantly biomass-based injera baking method. The system was designed and developed with fryers 40, 50, and 55 cm in diameter and two operational options: continuous mode and alternating mode. Extensive experimental testing was conducted on each prototype to demonstrate solar frying and determine the relative performance. The findings indicate that the 2 kW heating capacity of the 40 cm-sized solar fryer model conducted baking processes at a relatively lower system temperature in both application modes compared to the larger-sized fryers. As a result, this system maintained a consistent average fryer temperature distribution and shorter initial heating time, without the requirement of a reheating process during the subsequent baking cycles. The experimental testing also demonstrated that alternating-mode applications were more practical for the 40 cm-sized fryers than for the larger ones. Overall, direct solar frying is more efficient and convenient for the 40 cm-sized solar fryers. In contrast, the larger-sized systems required a larger fryer thermal storage capacity coupled with larger-size solar concentrators to maintain equivalent stable operational conditions, conversely leading to a lack of application simplicity and higher system costs.