Loading…

Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies

For decades, GNSS code measurements were much noisier than phase ones, limiting their applicability to ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. Ultra-wideband AltBOC signals changed the situation. This study revisits the Galileo E5 and BeiDou B2 AltBOC signals and their potential applicatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (19), p.6472
Main Authors: Chen, Chuanfu, Pavlov, Ilya, Padokhin, Artem, Yasyukevich, Yury, Demyanov, Vladislav, Danilchuk, Ekaterina, Vesnin, Artem
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe75c2c2bcd53751016d0277aa9f56d22aab16717d531982eee693d21cbb5fb03
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 6472
container_title Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 24
creator Chen, Chuanfu
Pavlov, Ilya
Padokhin, Artem
Yasyukevich, Yury
Demyanov, Vladislav
Danilchuk, Ekaterina
Vesnin, Artem
description For decades, GNSS code measurements were much noisier than phase ones, limiting their applicability to ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. Ultra-wideband AltBOC signals changed the situation. This study revisits the Galileo E5 and BeiDou B2 AltBOC signals and their potential applications in TEC estimation. We found that TEC noises are comparable for the single-frequency AltBOC phase-code combination and those of the dual-frequency legacy BPSK/QPSK phase combination, while single-frequency BPSK/QPSK TEC noises are much higher. A two-week high-rate measurement campaign at the ACRG receiver revealed a mean 100 sec TEC RMS (used as the noise proxy) of 0.26 TECU, 0.15 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the BeiDou B2(a+b) AltBOC signal and satellite elevations 0-30°, 30-60°, and 60-90°, correspondingly, and 0.22 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the legacy B1/B3 dual-frequency phase combination. The Galileo E5(a+b) AltBOC signal corresponding values were 0.25 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU; for the legacy signals' phase combination, the values were 0.19 TECU, 0.13 TECU, and 0.08 TECU. The AltBOC (for both BeiDou and Galileo) SNR exceeds those of BPSK/QPSK by 7.5 dB-Hz in undisturbed conditions. Radio frequency interference (the 28 August 2022 and 9 May 2024 Solar Radio Burst events in our study) decreased the AltBOC SNR 5 dB-Hz more against QPSK SNR, but, due to the higher initial SNR, the threshold for the loss of the lock was never broken. Today, we have enough BeiDou and Galileo satellites that transmit AltBOC signals for a reliable single-frequency estimation. This study provides new insights and evidence for using Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC signals in high-precision ionospheric monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/s24196472
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_44de4e415136479e883fc5aee857b174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A813764339</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_44de4e415136479e883fc5aee857b174</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A813764339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe75c2c2bcd53751016d0277aa9f56d22aab16717d531982eee693d21cbb5fb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1vGyEQhlHVqvloD_0D1Uq9pAenDLDLcqocN0ktRUqlumfEwqyNtV5c2I3Uf182Tq2k4gBi3nmGGV5CPgC95FzRL4kJUJWQ7BU5BcHErGaMvn52PiFnKW0pZZzz-i054UpQVQI7Jatb0_kOQ2F6V1yh_xbGYt4NV_eL4qdf96ZLj5HVBn0sfmBMe7SDf8BUtCEWy9CHtN9g9LZYXeeUYXQe0zvyps2Z-P5pPye_bq5Xi--zu_vb5WJ-N7NcqWHWoiwts6yxruSyBAqVo0xKY1RbVo4xYxqoJMgcBlUzRKwUdwxs05RtQ_k5WR64Lpit3ke_M_GPDsbrx4sQ19rEwdsOtRAOBQoogedBKaxr3trSINalbECKzPp6YO3HZofOYj9E072Avoz0fqPX4UEDZB6nkAkXT4QYfo-YBr3zyWLXmR7DmDQHkFRWwKZin_6TbsMYp2lPqqpSTPEJeHlQrU3uwPdtyIVtXg533oYe2_xzel4Dl5XIRsgJnw8JNoaUIrbH5wPVk1P00SlZ-_F5v0flP2vwvzjStiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116692931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Chen, Chuanfu ; Pavlov, Ilya ; Padokhin, Artem ; Yasyukevich, Yury ; Demyanov, Vladislav ; Danilchuk, Ekaterina ; Vesnin, Artem</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanfu ; Pavlov, Ilya ; Padokhin, Artem ; Yasyukevich, Yury ; Demyanov, Vladislav ; Danilchuk, Ekaterina ; Vesnin, Artem</creatorcontrib><description>For decades, GNSS code measurements were much noisier than phase ones, limiting their applicability to ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. Ultra-wideband AltBOC signals changed the situation. This study revisits the Galileo E5 and BeiDou B2 AltBOC signals and their potential applications in TEC estimation. We found that TEC noises are comparable for the single-frequency AltBOC phase-code combination and those of the dual-frequency legacy BPSK/QPSK phase combination, while single-frequency BPSK/QPSK TEC noises are much higher. A two-week high-rate measurement campaign at the ACRG receiver revealed a mean 100 sec TEC RMS (used as the noise proxy) of 0.26 TECU, 0.15 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the BeiDou B2(a+b) AltBOC signal and satellite elevations 0-30°, 30-60°, and 60-90°, correspondingly, and 0.22 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the legacy B1/B3 dual-frequency phase combination. The Galileo E5(a+b) AltBOC signal corresponding values were 0.25 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU; for the legacy signals' phase combination, the values were 0.19 TECU, 0.13 TECU, and 0.08 TECU. The AltBOC (for both BeiDou and Galileo) SNR exceeds those of BPSK/QPSK by 7.5 dB-Hz in undisturbed conditions. Radio frequency interference (the 28 August 2022 and 9 May 2024 Solar Radio Burst events in our study) decreased the AltBOC SNR 5 dB-Hz more against QPSK SNR, but, due to the higher initial SNR, the threshold for the loss of the lock was never broken. Today, we have enough BeiDou and Galileo satellites that transmit AltBOC signals for a reliable single-frequency estimation. This study provides new insights and evidence for using Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC signals in high-precision ionospheric monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s24196472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39409512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; AltBOC ; Artificial satellites ; BeiDou ; BPSK ; Communication ; Galileo ; Ionosphere ; Noise ; QPSK ; Radio communications ; Receivers &amp; amplifiers ; Satellites ; Spectrum allocation ; TEC</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (19), p.6472</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe75c2c2bcd53751016d0277aa9f56d22aab16717d531982eee693d21cbb5fb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3098-224X ; 0000-0003-2893-9522 ; 0000-0002-0190-2140 ; 0009-0002-3330-8880 ; 0000-0001-8907-2710 ; 0000-0002-9896-5841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3116692931/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3116692931?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39409512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padokhin, Artem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasyukevich, Yury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demyanov, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danilchuk, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesnin, Artem</creatorcontrib><title>Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>For decades, GNSS code measurements were much noisier than phase ones, limiting their applicability to ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. Ultra-wideband AltBOC signals changed the situation. This study revisits the Galileo E5 and BeiDou B2 AltBOC signals and their potential applications in TEC estimation. We found that TEC noises are comparable for the single-frequency AltBOC phase-code combination and those of the dual-frequency legacy BPSK/QPSK phase combination, while single-frequency BPSK/QPSK TEC noises are much higher. A two-week high-rate measurement campaign at the ACRG receiver revealed a mean 100 sec TEC RMS (used as the noise proxy) of 0.26 TECU, 0.15 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the BeiDou B2(a+b) AltBOC signal and satellite elevations 0-30°, 30-60°, and 60-90°, correspondingly, and 0.22 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the legacy B1/B3 dual-frequency phase combination. The Galileo E5(a+b) AltBOC signal corresponding values were 0.25 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU; for the legacy signals' phase combination, the values were 0.19 TECU, 0.13 TECU, and 0.08 TECU. The AltBOC (for both BeiDou and Galileo) SNR exceeds those of BPSK/QPSK by 7.5 dB-Hz in undisturbed conditions. Radio frequency interference (the 28 August 2022 and 9 May 2024 Solar Radio Burst events in our study) decreased the AltBOC SNR 5 dB-Hz more against QPSK SNR, but, due to the higher initial SNR, the threshold for the loss of the lock was never broken. Today, we have enough BeiDou and Galileo satellites that transmit AltBOC signals for a reliable single-frequency estimation. This study provides new insights and evidence for using Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC signals in high-precision ionospheric monitoring.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>AltBOC</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>BeiDou</subject><subject>BPSK</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Galileo</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>QPSK</subject><subject>Radio communications</subject><subject>Receivers &amp; amplifiers</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spectrum allocation</subject><subject>TEC</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1vGyEQhlHVqvloD_0D1Uq9pAenDLDLcqocN0ktRUqlumfEwqyNtV5c2I3Uf182Tq2k4gBi3nmGGV5CPgC95FzRL4kJUJWQ7BU5BcHErGaMvn52PiFnKW0pZZzz-i054UpQVQI7Jatb0_kOQ2F6V1yh_xbGYt4NV_eL4qdf96ZLj5HVBn0sfmBMe7SDf8BUtCEWy9CHtN9g9LZYXeeUYXQe0zvyps2Z-P5pPye_bq5Xi--zu_vb5WJ-N7NcqWHWoiwts6yxruSyBAqVo0xKY1RbVo4xYxqoJMgcBlUzRKwUdwxs05RtQ_k5WR64Lpit3ke_M_GPDsbrx4sQ19rEwdsOtRAOBQoogedBKaxr3trSINalbECKzPp6YO3HZofOYj9E072Avoz0fqPX4UEDZB6nkAkXT4QYfo-YBr3zyWLXmR7DmDQHkFRWwKZin_6TbsMYp2lPqqpSTPEJeHlQrU3uwPdtyIVtXg533oYe2_xzel4Dl5XIRsgJnw8JNoaUIrbH5wPVk1P00SlZ-_F5v0flP2vwvzjStiQ</recordid><startdate>20241008</startdate><enddate>20241008</enddate><creator>Chen, Chuanfu</creator><creator>Pavlov, Ilya</creator><creator>Padokhin, Artem</creator><creator>Yasyukevich, Yury</creator><creator>Demyanov, Vladislav</creator><creator>Danilchuk, Ekaterina</creator><creator>Vesnin, Artem</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-224X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-9522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-2140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3330-8880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-2710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-5841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241008</creationdate><title>Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies</title><author>Chen, Chuanfu ; Pavlov, Ilya ; Padokhin, Artem ; Yasyukevich, Yury ; Demyanov, Vladislav ; Danilchuk, Ekaterina ; Vesnin, Artem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe75c2c2bcd53751016d0277aa9f56d22aab16717d531982eee693d21cbb5fb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>AltBOC</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>BeiDou</topic><topic>BPSK</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Galileo</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>QPSK</topic><topic>Radio communications</topic><topic>Receivers &amp; amplifiers</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spectrum allocation</topic><topic>TEC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chuanfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padokhin, Artem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasyukevich, Yury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demyanov, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danilchuk, Ekaterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesnin, Artem</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Chuanfu</au><au>Pavlov, Ilya</au><au>Padokhin, Artem</au><au>Yasyukevich, Yury</au><au>Demyanov, Vladislav</au><au>Danilchuk, Ekaterina</au><au>Vesnin, Artem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-10-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>6472</spage><pages>6472-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>For decades, GNSS code measurements were much noisier than phase ones, limiting their applicability to ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies. Ultra-wideband AltBOC signals changed the situation. This study revisits the Galileo E5 and BeiDou B2 AltBOC signals and their potential applications in TEC estimation. We found that TEC noises are comparable for the single-frequency AltBOC phase-code combination and those of the dual-frequency legacy BPSK/QPSK phase combination, while single-frequency BPSK/QPSK TEC noises are much higher. A two-week high-rate measurement campaign at the ACRG receiver revealed a mean 100 sec TEC RMS (used as the noise proxy) of 0.26 TECU, 0.15 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the BeiDou B2(a+b) AltBOC signal and satellite elevations 0-30°, 30-60°, and 60-90°, correspondingly, and 0.22 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU for the legacy B1/B3 dual-frequency phase combination. The Galileo E5(a+b) AltBOC signal corresponding values were 0.25 TECU, 0.14 TECU, and 0.09 TECU; for the legacy signals' phase combination, the values were 0.19 TECU, 0.13 TECU, and 0.08 TECU. The AltBOC (for both BeiDou and Galileo) SNR exceeds those of BPSK/QPSK by 7.5 dB-Hz in undisturbed conditions. Radio frequency interference (the 28 August 2022 and 9 May 2024 Solar Radio Burst events in our study) decreased the AltBOC SNR 5 dB-Hz more against QPSK SNR, but, due to the higher initial SNR, the threshold for the loss of the lock was never broken. Today, we have enough BeiDou and Galileo satellites that transmit AltBOC signals for a reliable single-frequency estimation. This study provides new insights and evidence for using Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC signals in high-precision ionospheric monitoring.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39409512</pmid><doi>10.3390/s24196472</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-224X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-9522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-2140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3330-8880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-2710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-5841</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-8220
ispartof Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-10, Vol.24 (19), p.6472
issn 1424-8220
1424-8220
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_44de4e415136479e883fc5aee857b174
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Accuracy
AltBOC
Artificial satellites
BeiDou
BPSK
Communication
Galileo
Ionosphere
Noise
QPSK
Radio communications
Receivers & amplifiers
Satellites
Spectrum allocation
TEC
title Galileo and BeiDou AltBOC Signals and Their Perspectives for Ionospheric TEC Studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A59%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Galileo%20and%20BeiDou%20AltBOC%20Signals%20and%20Their%20Perspectives%20for%20Ionospheric%20TEC%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Chen,%20Chuanfu&rft.date=2024-10-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=6472&rft.pages=6472-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s24196472&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA813764339%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-fe75c2c2bcd53751016d0277aa9f56d22aab16717d531982eee693d21cbb5fb03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116692931&rft_id=info:pmid/39409512&rft_galeid=A813764339&rfr_iscdi=true