A Meta-Analysis to Estimate Prevalence of Resistance to Tetracyclines and Third Generation Cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Food Crops

Application of human and animal waste to fields and water sources and on-farm antimicrobial usage are documented contributors to the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in agricultural domains. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of resistance to tetracycline (TET) and thir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antibiotics (Basel) 2022-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1424
Main Authors: Brunn, Ariel A, Roustit, Manon, Kadri-Alabi, Zaharat, Guardabassi, Luca, Waage, Jeff
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agriculture
Analysis
Animal wastes
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial resistance
Bacteria
Bias
Cephaloridine
Cephalosporins
Crops
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Enterobacteriaceae
Estimates
Farms
Food
Food contamination & poisoning
Food crops
Food selection
food value chains
Harvest
Human wastes
Livestock
Meta-analysis
Moxalactam
Observational studies
Plant-based foods
Public health
Risk assessment
Sampling methods
Sensitivity analysis
Surveillance
Tetracycline
Tetracyclines
Value chain
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Application of human and animal waste to fields and water sources and on-farm antimicrobial usage are documented contributors to the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in agricultural domains. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of resistance to tetracycline (TET) and third generation cephalosporins (3GC) in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from food crops. TET was selected in view of its wide use in agriculture, whereas 3GC were selected because of the public health concerns of reported resistance to these critically important antibiotics in the environment. Forty-two studies from all six world regions published between 2010 and 2022 met the eligibility criteria. A random effects model estimated that 4.63% (95% CI: 2.57%, 7.18%; p-value:
ISSN:2079-6382
2079-6382
DOI:10.3390/antibiotics11101424