Loading…

The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2020-10, Vol.5 (4)
Main Authors: Refaie, Ramsay, Shahid, Zuhaib, Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas, Siddique, Malik S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Foot & ankle orthopaedics
container_volume 5
creator Refaie, Ramsay
Shahid, Zuhaib
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Siddique, Malik S.
description Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. Results: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. Conclusion: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2473011420S00399
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_451ae421313c4c5baf468ab67630d21a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2473011420S00399</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_451ae421313c4c5baf468ab67630d21a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2476106015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8d23d09fd51e08c70f14a8ff3ce63f2a46f794e427a0c2a4cb7c18189b1ed10b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhU1pICHJPUdBL-3B7YwtW_alsCybNhDowm7OYixLtre25Up2IP--2m5ImkJPkp7e-4bhRdENwmdEIb4kXKSAyBPYAaRl-S66OErxUXv_1_08uvb-AAAosrIsioto2reaPXjNrGG7bmx6HW9bO9sx3gyd950d2doO0zLrmu3tYBtHU_vEPu62m_X-EzPWsTkQNo_ULzQf7QG0pW40S89W489es5WbW2ennvzcaX8VnRnqvb5-Pi-jh9vNfv09vv_x7W69uo9VIqCMizpJayhNnaGGQgkwyKkwJlU6T01CPDei5JongkCFp6qEwgKLskJdI1TpZXR34taWDnJy3UDuSVrq5B_BukaSmzvVa8kzpEDCFFPFVVaR4XlBVS7yFOoEKbC-nljTUg26VnqcHfVvoG9_xq6VjX2URV7mnGMAfHgGOPtr0X6WB7u4MewvQzc5Qg6YBRecXMpZ7502LxMQ5LFn-W_PIRKfIp4a_Qr9r_83ZNantg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476106015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Refaie, Ramsay ; Shahid, Zuhaib ; Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas ; Siddique, Malik S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Refaie, Ramsay ; Shahid, Zuhaib ; Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas ; Siddique, Malik S.</creatorcontrib><description>Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. Results: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. Conclusion: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2473011420S00399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ankle ; Joint surgery ; Pain ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics, 2020-10, Vol.5 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 American Orthopaedic Foot &amp; Ankle Society, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696441/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2476106015?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Refaie, Ramsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahid, Zuhaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddique, Malik S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</title><description>Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. Results: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. Conclusion: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties.</description><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2473-0114</issn><issn>2473-0114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhU1pICHJPUdBL-3B7YwtW_alsCybNhDowm7OYixLtre25Up2IP--2m5ImkJPkp7e-4bhRdENwmdEIb4kXKSAyBPYAaRl-S66OErxUXv_1_08uvb-AAAosrIsioto2reaPXjNrGG7bmx6HW9bO9sx3gyd950d2doO0zLrmu3tYBtHU_vEPu62m_X-EzPWsTkQNo_ULzQf7QG0pW40S89W489es5WbW2ennvzcaX8VnRnqvb5-Pi-jh9vNfv09vv_x7W69uo9VIqCMizpJayhNnaGGQgkwyKkwJlU6T01CPDei5JongkCFp6qEwgKLskJdI1TpZXR34taWDnJy3UDuSVrq5B_BukaSmzvVa8kzpEDCFFPFVVaR4XlBVS7yFOoEKbC-nljTUg26VnqcHfVvoG9_xq6VjX2URV7mnGMAfHgGOPtr0X6WB7u4MewvQzc5Qg6YBRecXMpZ7502LxMQ5LFn-W_PIRKfIp4a_Qr9r_83ZNantg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Refaie, Ramsay</creator><creator>Shahid, Zuhaib</creator><creator>Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas</creator><creator>Siddique, Malik S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties</title><author>Refaie, Ramsay ; Shahid, Zuhaib ; Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas ; Siddique, Malik S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8d23d09fd51e08c70f14a8ff3ce63f2a46f794e427a0c2a4cb7c18189b1ed10b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Refaie, Ramsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahid, Zuhaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddique, Malik S.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Refaie, Ramsay</au><au>Shahid, Zuhaib</au><au>Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas</au><au>Siddique, Malik S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle orthopaedics</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2473-0114</issn><eissn>2473-0114</eissn><abstract>Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. Results: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. Conclusion: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2473011420S00399</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2473-0114
ispartof Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2020-10, Vol.5 (4)
issn 2473-0114
2473-0114
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_451ae421313c4c5baf468ab67630d21a
source Open Access: PubMed Central; SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Ankle
Joint surgery
Pain
Patients
title The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A10%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Single-Photon-Emission%20Computed%20Tomography%20(SPECT)%20for%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Painful%20Ankle%20Arthroplasties&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Refaie,%20Ramsay&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2473-0114&rft.eissn=2473-0114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2473011420S00399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2476106015%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8d23d09fd51e08c70f14a8ff3ce63f2a46f794e427a0c2a4cb7c18189b1ed10b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476106015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2473011420S00399&rfr_iscdi=true