Loading…
Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)
Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Blood cancer journal (New York) 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.27-8, Article 27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Blood cancer journal (New York) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Dispenzieri, Angela Krishnan, Amrita Arendt, Bonnie Blackwell, Beth Wallace, Paul K. Dasari, Surendra Vogl, Dan T. Efebera, Yvonne Fei, Mingwei Geller, Nancy Giralt, Sergio Hahn, Theresa Howard, Alan Kohlhagen, Mindy Landau, Heather Hari, Parameswaran Pasquini, Marcelo C. Qazilbash, Muzaffar H. McCarthy, Philip Shah, Nina Vesole, David H. Stadtmauer, Edward Murray, David |
description | Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41408-022-00624-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4550e3b5162c4ca0a41f3e9c97b698cb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4550e3b5162c4ca0a41f3e9c97b698cb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2627131203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CALHEph6Xjv7t7QQoRgUhJi5Rwtrxeb-Jod73YDqIPwvviJKW0HPDFHs9vPs9YX5a9xvAeAy2vA8MMyhwIyQEEYbl4lp0TYCzntOTPH53PsssQdpAWF7jC1cvsjHLMOBT4PPu1VCHkM_sT1SZG49HoTWN1DKh1Hn2drZAaGnS7QnGrBhRiipRvUG_i1jUBqd4NG9Tvu2jHzqD-znSuV2hU0ZohiYzKR6vtIU6cG5KMQav1ZDm_maDorerQ1cflGk3XNwgKIOgaisX63avsRau6YC7v94vs2-zTevolX9x-nk8ni1xzBjEXgohSt5RyCrWgdVFCVdU1FtAUApjRpm4IBqUpMaXCjda8BYWLqsEgGlHQi2x-0m2c2snR2175O-mUlccL5zfyOEBnJOMcDK05FkQzrUAx3FJT6aqoRVXqOml9OGmN-7o3jU7ze9U9EX2aGexWbtwPWZYU8-rQzNW9gHff9yZE2dugTdepwbh9kESQkgImjCX07T_ozu39kL7qQBWYYgI0UeREae9C8KZ9aAaDPJhInkwkk4nk0URSpKI3j8d4KPljmQTQExBSatgY__ft_8j-Bgn1z9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627131203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Dispenzieri, Angela ; Krishnan, Amrita ; Arendt, Bonnie ; Blackwell, Beth ; Wallace, Paul K. ; Dasari, Surendra ; Vogl, Dan T. ; Efebera, Yvonne ; Fei, Mingwei ; Geller, Nancy ; Giralt, Sergio ; Hahn, Theresa ; Howard, Alan ; Kohlhagen, Mindy ; Landau, Heather ; Hari, Parameswaran ; Pasquini, Marcelo C. ; Qazilbash, Muzaffar H. ; McCarthy, Philip ; Shah, Nina ; Vesole, David H. ; Stadtmauer, Edward ; Murray, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Dispenzieri, Angela ; Krishnan, Amrita ; Arendt, Bonnie ; Blackwell, Beth ; Wallace, Paul K. ; Dasari, Surendra ; Vogl, Dan T. ; Efebera, Yvonne ; Fei, Mingwei ; Geller, Nancy ; Giralt, Sergio ; Hahn, Theresa ; Howard, Alan ; Kohlhagen, Mindy ; Landau, Heather ; Hari, Parameswaran ; Pasquini, Marcelo C. ; Qazilbash, Muzaffar H. ; McCarthy, Philip ; Shah, Nina ; Vesole, David H. ; Stadtmauer, Edward ; Murray, David</creatorcontrib><description>Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-5385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00624-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35145071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>13/31 ; 631/67/1990/804 ; 692/699/1541/1990/804 ; 82/58 ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Bone marrow ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; Clinical trials ; Cytogenetics ; Diterpenes ; Enrollments ; Flow cytometry ; Flow Cytometry - methods ; Hematology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Laboratories ; Mass spectrometry ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - drug therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Progression-Free Survival ; Scientific imaging ; Software ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Blood cancer journal (New York), 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.27-8, Article 27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4163-8823 ; 0000-0003-2876-2886 ; 0000-0001-8780-9512 ; 0000-0003-1944-5053 ; 0000-0002-8800-297X ; 0000-0003-1720-335X ; 0000-0002-2935-2566 ; 0000-0002-3152-1189 ; 0000-0002-3835-8855</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627131203/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627131203?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dispenzieri, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendt, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasari, Surendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Dan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efebera, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Mingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giralt, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhagen, Mindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hari, Parameswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquini, Marcelo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesole, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadtmauer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, David</creatorcontrib><title>Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)</title><title>Blood cancer journal (New York)</title><addtitle>Blood Cancer J</addtitle><addtitle>Blood Cancer J</addtitle><description>Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.</description><subject>13/31</subject><subject>631/67/1990/804</subject><subject>692/699/1541/1990/804</subject><subject>82/58</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cytogenetics</subject><subject>Diterpenes</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry - methods</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Progression-Free Survival</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2044-5385</issn><issn>2044-5385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9uEzEQxlcIRKvSF-CALHEph6Xjv7t7QQoRgUhJi5Rwtrxeb-Jod73YDqIPwvviJKW0HPDFHs9vPs9YX5a9xvAeAy2vA8MMyhwIyQEEYbl4lp0TYCzntOTPH53PsssQdpAWF7jC1cvsjHLMOBT4PPu1VCHkM_sT1SZG49HoTWN1DKh1Hn2drZAaGnS7QnGrBhRiipRvUG_i1jUBqd4NG9Tvu2jHzqD-znSuV2hU0ZohiYzKR6vtIU6cG5KMQav1ZDm_maDorerQ1cflGk3XNwgKIOgaisX63avsRau6YC7v94vs2-zTevolX9x-nk8ni1xzBjEXgohSt5RyCrWgdVFCVdU1FtAUApjRpm4IBqUpMaXCjda8BYWLqsEgGlHQi2x-0m2c2snR2175O-mUlccL5zfyOEBnJOMcDK05FkQzrUAx3FJT6aqoRVXqOml9OGmN-7o3jU7ze9U9EX2aGexWbtwPWZYU8-rQzNW9gHff9yZE2dugTdepwbh9kESQkgImjCX07T_ozu39kL7qQBWYYgI0UeREae9C8KZ9aAaDPJhInkwkk4nk0URSpKI3j8d4KPljmQTQExBSatgY__ft_8j-Bgn1z9w</recordid><startdate>20220210</startdate><enddate>20220210</enddate><creator>Dispenzieri, Angela</creator><creator>Krishnan, Amrita</creator><creator>Arendt, Bonnie</creator><creator>Blackwell, Beth</creator><creator>Wallace, Paul K.</creator><creator>Dasari, Surendra</creator><creator>Vogl, Dan T.</creator><creator>Efebera, Yvonne</creator><creator>Fei, Mingwei</creator><creator>Geller, Nancy</creator><creator>Giralt, Sergio</creator><creator>Hahn, Theresa</creator><creator>Howard, Alan</creator><creator>Kohlhagen, Mindy</creator><creator>Landau, Heather</creator><creator>Hari, Parameswaran</creator><creator>Pasquini, Marcelo C.</creator><creator>Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Philip</creator><creator>Shah, Nina</creator><creator>Vesole, David H.</creator><creator>Stadtmauer, Edward</creator><creator>Murray, David</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4163-8823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-2886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-9512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-5053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-297X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-335X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-2566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-1189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-8855</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220210</creationdate><title>Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)</title><author>Dispenzieri, Angela ; Krishnan, Amrita ; Arendt, Bonnie ; Blackwell, Beth ; Wallace, Paul K. ; Dasari, Surendra ; Vogl, Dan T. ; Efebera, Yvonne ; Fei, Mingwei ; Geller, Nancy ; Giralt, Sergio ; Hahn, Theresa ; Howard, Alan ; Kohlhagen, Mindy ; Landau, Heather ; Hari, Parameswaran ; Pasquini, Marcelo C. ; Qazilbash, Muzaffar H. ; McCarthy, Philip ; Shah, Nina ; Vesole, David H. ; Stadtmauer, Edward ; Murray, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>13/31</topic><topic>631/67/1990/804</topic><topic>692/699/1541/1990/804</topic><topic>82/58</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cytogenetics</topic><topic>Diterpenes</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry - methods</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Progression-Free Survival</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dispenzieri, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendt, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasari, Surendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Dan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efebera, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fei, Mingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giralt, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlhagen, Mindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hari, Parameswaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquini, Marcelo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesole, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadtmauer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, David</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Blood cancer journal (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dispenzieri, Angela</au><au>Krishnan, Amrita</au><au>Arendt, Bonnie</au><au>Blackwell, Beth</au><au>Wallace, Paul K.</au><au>Dasari, Surendra</au><au>Vogl, Dan T.</au><au>Efebera, Yvonne</au><au>Fei, Mingwei</au><au>Geller, Nancy</au><au>Giralt, Sergio</au><au>Hahn, Theresa</au><au>Howard, Alan</au><au>Kohlhagen, Mindy</au><au>Landau, Heather</au><au>Hari, Parameswaran</au><au>Pasquini, Marcelo C.</au><au>Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.</au><au>McCarthy, Philip</au><au>Shah, Nina</au><au>Vesole, David H.</au><au>Stadtmauer, Edward</au><au>Murray, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)</atitle><jtitle>Blood cancer journal (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Blood Cancer J</stitle><addtitle>Blood Cancer J</addtitle><date>2022-02-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>27-8</pages><artnum>27</artnum><issn>2044-5385</issn><eissn>2044-5385</eissn><abstract>Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35145071</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41408-022-00624-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4163-8823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-2886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-9512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-5053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-297X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-335X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-2566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-1189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-8855</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-5385 |
ispartof | Blood cancer journal (New York), 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.27-8, Article 27 |
issn | 2044-5385 2044-5385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4550e3b5162c4ca0a41f3e9c97b698cb |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 13/31 631/67/1990/804 692/699/1541/1990/804 82/58 Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Bone marrow Cancer Cancer Research Clinical trials Cytogenetics Diterpenes Enrollments Flow cytometry Flow Cytometry - methods Hematology Humans Hypotheses Laboratories Mass spectrometry Multiple myeloma Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis Multiple Myeloma - drug therapy Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis Oncology Patients Prognosis Progression-Free Survival Scientific imaging Software Treatment Outcome |
title | Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mass-Fix%20better%20predicts%20for%20PFS%20and%20OS%20than%20standard%20methods%20among%20multiple%20myeloma%20patients%20participating%20on%20the%20STAMINA%20trial%20(BMT%20CTN%200702%20/07LT)&rft.jtitle=Blood%20cancer%20journal%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Dispenzieri,%20Angela&rft.date=2022-02-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=27-8&rft.artnum=27&rft.issn=2044-5385&rft.eissn=2044-5385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41408-022-00624-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2627131203%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-66268cf33530b63b78099bb160d7604ecebd210ac32e8a1dcc5f0a179d106d673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627131203&rft_id=info:pmid/35145071&rfr_iscdi=true |