Loading…

A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions

Septic tank systems (STSs) are widely utilised flowsheets for decentralised wastewater treatment in the UK. With a growing consensus that STSs have a sizeable detrimental impact on the environment, there is a need for rural flowsheets with improved treatment capabilities. This study examines the lif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:H2Open journal 2023-09, Vol.6 (3), p.361-372
Main Authors: Brown, Gareth C., MacAdam, Jitka, Dotro, Gabriela, Jefferson, Bruce
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703
container_end_page 372
container_issue 3
container_start_page 361
container_title H2Open journal
container_volume 6
creator Brown, Gareth C.
MacAdam, Jitka
Dotro, Gabriela
Jefferson, Bruce
description Septic tank systems (STSs) are widely utilised flowsheets for decentralised wastewater treatment in the UK. With a growing consensus that STSs have a sizeable detrimental impact on the environment, there is a need for rural flowsheets with improved treatment capabilities. This study examines the lifetime cost and carbon emissions of using an enhanced septic tank nature-based solution (EST-NBS) to improve STS compared to a package treatment system (submerged aerated filter (SAF)). The wholelife cost (WLC) of the flowsheets and Scope 2 cradle-to-grave lifetime carbon emissions (LCEs) of the flowsheets were assessed. The EST-NBS flowsheets represent a lower cost improved treatment system than SAFs at population equivalents (PEs) from 5 to 1,000. An STS averages an LCE of over 4,000 kg CO2eq PE−1, with all other considered flowsheets having lower emissions. The EST-NBS flowsheets had lower carbon emissions than SAFs. Even at low populations upgrading from an STS to an EST-NBS is a competitive abatement strategy, with costs of £260 tCO2eq−1 emissions avoided, at 1,000 PE an NBS flowsheet has an abatement cost of –£17 tCO2eq−1. This shows the potential of using NBS flowsheets in rural wastewater treatment providing both a carbon and cost incentive against traditional designs.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/h2oj.2023.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_457e48bbfdc74472a7f50625d70690f6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_457e48bbfdc74472a7f50625d70690f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_457e48bbfdc74472a7f50625d70690f6</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGqX7vMHpiaZmWRmWYqPQsGNrsPNq00dJ0OSKv57Uyvi6p5z7-Fw-RC6pWTJKOd3exYOS0ZYvSSEXaAZ45RXvKXd5T99jRYpHUhJCEGJ4DO0X-HPfRjs4J3FOqSMYTRYQ1RhxJONabI6-w-Lg8MwZBtHONmEc8DJTtlrnGF8S_iY_eCTH3e4JI7RVgqSNTiFoVzCmG7QlYMh2cXvnKPXh_uX9VO1fX7crFfbStcNy5XgNed111oDSmuragoGOiBGM-hokZq6nvWaUaI41aQt3gF3VivTN4LUc7Q595oABzlF_w7xSwbw8mcR4k5CLG8PVjatsE2nlDNaNI1gIFxLOGuNILwnjpeu6tylY0gpWvfXR4k8UZcn6vJEXRam9TeA9nfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brown, Gareth C. ; MacAdam, Jitka ; Dotro, Gabriela ; Jefferson, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gareth C. ; MacAdam, Jitka ; Dotro, Gabriela ; Jefferson, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Septic tank systems (STSs) are widely utilised flowsheets for decentralised wastewater treatment in the UK. With a growing consensus that STSs have a sizeable detrimental impact on the environment, there is a need for rural flowsheets with improved treatment capabilities. This study examines the lifetime cost and carbon emissions of using an enhanced septic tank nature-based solution (EST-NBS) to improve STS compared to a package treatment system (submerged aerated filter (SAF)). The wholelife cost (WLC) of the flowsheets and Scope 2 cradle-to-grave lifetime carbon emissions (LCEs) of the flowsheets were assessed. The EST-NBS flowsheets represent a lower cost improved treatment system than SAFs at population equivalents (PEs) from 5 to 1,000. An STS averages an LCE of over 4,000 kg CO2eq PE−1, with all other considered flowsheets having lower emissions. The EST-NBS flowsheets had lower carbon emissions than SAFs. Even at low populations upgrading from an STS to an EST-NBS is a competitive abatement strategy, with costs of £260 tCO2eq−1 emissions avoided, at 1,000 PE an NBS flowsheet has an abatement cost of –£17 tCO2eq−1. This shows the potential of using NBS flowsheets in rural wastewater treatment providing both a carbon and cost incentive against traditional designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2616-6518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2616-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/h2oj.2023.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>lca ; nature-based solutions ; septic tanks ; wlc</subject><ispartof>H2Open journal, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3), p.361-372</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2612-1241</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gareth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacAdam, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotro, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferson, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions</title><title>H2Open journal</title><description>Septic tank systems (STSs) are widely utilised flowsheets for decentralised wastewater treatment in the UK. With a growing consensus that STSs have a sizeable detrimental impact on the environment, there is a need for rural flowsheets with improved treatment capabilities. This study examines the lifetime cost and carbon emissions of using an enhanced septic tank nature-based solution (EST-NBS) to improve STS compared to a package treatment system (submerged aerated filter (SAF)). The wholelife cost (WLC) of the flowsheets and Scope 2 cradle-to-grave lifetime carbon emissions (LCEs) of the flowsheets were assessed. The EST-NBS flowsheets represent a lower cost improved treatment system than SAFs at population equivalents (PEs) from 5 to 1,000. An STS averages an LCE of over 4,000 kg CO2eq PE−1, with all other considered flowsheets having lower emissions. The EST-NBS flowsheets had lower carbon emissions than SAFs. Even at low populations upgrading from an STS to an EST-NBS is a competitive abatement strategy, with costs of £260 tCO2eq−1 emissions avoided, at 1,000 PE an NBS flowsheet has an abatement cost of –£17 tCO2eq−1. This shows the potential of using NBS flowsheets in rural wastewater treatment providing both a carbon and cost incentive against traditional designs.</description><subject>lca</subject><subject>nature-based solutions</subject><subject>septic tanks</subject><subject>wlc</subject><issn>2616-6518</issn><issn>2616-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGqX7vMHpiaZmWRmWYqPQsGNrsPNq00dJ0OSKv57Uyvi6p5z7-Fw-RC6pWTJKOd3exYOS0ZYvSSEXaAZ45RXvKXd5T99jRYpHUhJCEGJ4DO0X-HPfRjs4J3FOqSMYTRYQ1RhxJONabI6-w-Lg8MwZBtHONmEc8DJTtlrnGF8S_iY_eCTH3e4JI7RVgqSNTiFoVzCmG7QlYMh2cXvnKPXh_uX9VO1fX7crFfbStcNy5XgNed111oDSmuragoGOiBGM-hokZq6nvWaUaI41aQt3gF3VivTN4LUc7Q595oABzlF_w7xSwbw8mcR4k5CLG8PVjatsE2nlDNaNI1gIFxLOGuNILwnjpeu6tylY0gpWvfXR4k8UZcn6vJEXRam9TeA9nfs</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Brown, Gareth C.</creator><creator>MacAdam, Jitka</creator><creator>Dotro, Gabriela</creator><creator>Jefferson, Bruce</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-1241</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions</title><author>Brown, Gareth C. ; MacAdam, Jitka ; Dotro, Gabriela ; Jefferson, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>lca</topic><topic>nature-based solutions</topic><topic>septic tanks</topic><topic>wlc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gareth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacAdam, Jitka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotro, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferson, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>H2Open journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Gareth C.</au><au>MacAdam, Jitka</au><au>Dotro, Gabriela</au><au>Jefferson, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions</atitle><jtitle>H2Open journal</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>361-372</pages><issn>2616-6518</issn><eissn>2616-6518</eissn><abstract>Septic tank systems (STSs) are widely utilised flowsheets for decentralised wastewater treatment in the UK. With a growing consensus that STSs have a sizeable detrimental impact on the environment, there is a need for rural flowsheets with improved treatment capabilities. This study examines the lifetime cost and carbon emissions of using an enhanced septic tank nature-based solution (EST-NBS) to improve STS compared to a package treatment system (submerged aerated filter (SAF)). The wholelife cost (WLC) of the flowsheets and Scope 2 cradle-to-grave lifetime carbon emissions (LCEs) of the flowsheets were assessed. The EST-NBS flowsheets represent a lower cost improved treatment system than SAFs at population equivalents (PEs) from 5 to 1,000. An STS averages an LCE of over 4,000 kg CO2eq PE−1, with all other considered flowsheets having lower emissions. The EST-NBS flowsheets had lower carbon emissions than SAFs. Even at low populations upgrading from an STS to an EST-NBS is a competitive abatement strategy, with costs of £260 tCO2eq−1 emissions avoided, at 1,000 PE an NBS flowsheet has an abatement cost of –£17 tCO2eq−1. This shows the potential of using NBS flowsheets in rural wastewater treatment providing both a carbon and cost incentive against traditional designs.</abstract><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/h2oj.2023.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-1241</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2616-6518
ispartof H2Open journal, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3), p.361-372
issn 2616-6518
2616-6518
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_457e48bbfdc74472a7f50625d70690f6
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects lca
nature-based solutions
septic tanks
wlc
title A wholelife cost and carbon perspective of alternatives to septic tanks utilising nature-based solutions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A19%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20wholelife%20cost%20and%20carbon%20perspective%20of%20alternatives%20to%20septic%20tanks%20utilising%20nature-based%20solutions&rft.jtitle=H2Open%20journal&rft.au=Brown,%20Gareth%20C.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=361-372&rft.issn=2616-6518&rft.eissn=2616-6518&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/h2oj.2023.002&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_457e48bbfdc74472a7f50625d70690f6%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-76366385edabcceb31ada8a0dc2a81da8c1f929c210b61c05c1ffa6fecbd94703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true